Sac st president v the um Pandas....

The place for news, information and discussion of athletics at "other" schools.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

Post Reply
User avatar
PapaG
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 9132
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:44 am
Location: The Magic City, MT

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....

Post by PapaG » Fri Oct 24, 2025 10:50 pm

Not sure if Sac State has a set passing offense. Run game was working.


Seattle to Billings to Missoula to Bozeman to Portland to Billings

What a ride

User avatar
PapaG
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 9132
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:44 am
Location: The Magic City, MT

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....

Post by PapaG » Fri Oct 24, 2025 10:51 pm

They’re just some stringy dudes running around on offense.


Seattle to Billings to Missoula to Bozeman to Portland to Billings

What a ride

OldGriz
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2023 2:22 pm

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....

Post by OldGriz » Fri Oct 24, 2025 11:06 pm

Sac State hung 49 points on Mercyhurst (compared to 17 for the Cats) and came into this game with a winning record.



Cataholic
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7472
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2014 10:09 pm

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....

Post by Cataholic » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:00 am

OldGriz wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 11:06 pm
Sac State hung 49 points on Mercyhurst (compared to 17 for the Cats) and came into this game with a winning record.
Sac State managed to score a total of 3 points against South Dakota State. They scored 35 against you tonight, and arguably should have had close to 50.



kwcat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3291
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:34 am

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....

Post by kwcat » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:16 am

Whatever sucks State sucks. I’m surprised Missoula let them within three scores. They are a subpar. Bottom league Big Sky school.

I don’t pull from Missoula often, but they should’ve beat them worse than they did.



tetoncat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4088
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Montana

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....

Post by tetoncat » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:40 am

OldGriz wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 11:06 pm
Sac State hung 49 points on Mercyhurst (compared to 17 for the Cats) and came into this game with a winning record.
Awesome Cats gave up zero, rotated players after first series, especially on oline and RB, ran vanilla game plan and were never in danger of losing. Did you watch the game?. Cats used it to improve and get players experience, looks like Sac used it to make themselves feel dominate.


Sports is not bigger than life

nanacat
Member # Retired
Posts: 2392
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 2:14 pm

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....

Post by nanacat » Sat Oct 25, 2025 7:56 am

OldGriz wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 11:06 pm
Sac State hung 49 points on Mercyhurst (compared to 17 for the Cats) and came into this game with a winning record.
You gotta come up with some new material old man. Seriously.



User avatar
ClowderUp
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 308
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2024 12:29 pm

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....

Post by ClowderUp » Sat Oct 25, 2025 8:22 am

Everyone. PlayerRep is a basic troll. Unoriginal and purposely ignorant just to elicit responses. No idea why he's here. He's hated day in and day out on the other site, and that should be plenty for him. But here we are.



User avatar
Hawks86
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 10784
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:27 pm
Location: MT

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....

Post by Hawks86 » Sat Oct 25, 2025 10:25 am

“The guy’s kind of a clown, right?”


"I'm a Bobcat forever its in my soul..."

User avatar
RickRund
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 8315
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:08 pm
Location: Post Falls ID

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....

Post by RickRund » Sat Oct 25, 2025 10:33 am

The gris look like they can score but their “d” does not look like they are able to keep a mediocre offense from putting up points. What happens when they go against a hot offense?

They have given up 103 to Sac, Idaho and Idaho St. By my math that is 34 per game. We only gave up 14 to ISU.

On Massey, the Gris stayed put at #5, Sagarin has them at #93. Be interesting to see if there is any movement after the weekend. Also on Massey, Sac dropped 3 spots.


msubobcats@outlook.com
Audiatur et altura pars: Let both sides be fairly heard.
Audi alteram partem: listen to the other side.

Cataholic
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7472
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2014 10:09 pm

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....

Post by Cataholic » Sat Oct 25, 2025 11:37 am

ClowderUp wrote:
Sat Oct 25, 2025 8:22 am
Everyone. PlayerRep is a basic troll. Unoriginal and purposely ignorant just to elicit responses. No idea why he's here. He's hated day in and day out on the other site, and that should be plenty for him. But here we are.
Let him troll. It just makes him look like a moron. And even more poetic with PlayerRep is that he is not anonymous as everyone knows who he is real life. What an idiot.



OldGriz
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2023 2:22 pm

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....

Post by OldGriz » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:28 pm

Cataholic wrote:
Sat Oct 25, 2025 11:37 am
ClowderUp wrote:
Sat Oct 25, 2025 8:22 am
Everyone. PlayerRep is a basic troll. Unoriginal and purposely ignorant just to elicit responses. No idea why he's here. He's hated day in and day out on the other site, and that should be plenty for him. But here we are.
Let him troll. It just makes him look like a moron. And even more poetic with PlayerRep is that he is not anonymous as everyone knows who he is real life. What an idiot.
What’d I say wrong?



User avatar
Hawks86
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 10784
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:27 pm
Location: MT

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....

Post by Hawks86 » Sat Oct 25, 2025 1:00 pm

There is a little-known codicil in the Bobcat Nation constitution that gives the mods unlimited power to preserve order of the board by ridding posters for the simple reason of being extremely annoying.


"I'm a Bobcat forever its in my soul..."

Cataholic
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7472
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2014 10:09 pm

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....

Post by Cataholic » Sat Oct 25, 2025 2:32 pm

OldGriz wrote:
Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:28 pm
Cataholic wrote:
Sat Oct 25, 2025 11:37 am
ClowderUp wrote:
Sat Oct 25, 2025 8:22 am
Everyone. PlayerRep is a basic troll. Unoriginal and purposely ignorant just to elicit responses. No idea why he's here. He's hated day in and day out on the other site, and that should be plenty for him. But here we are.
Let him troll. It just makes him look like a moron. And even more poetic with PlayerRep is that he is not anonymous as everyone knows who he is real life. What an idiot.
What’d I say wrong?
Your FTC comments are just moronic. The Mercyhurst comment is dumb. The political comments are not welcome. If you think your schtick is cute, it really isn’t. You look dumb. And trolling a rival’s fan board is quite frankly not what one would expect from a “high powered” attorney. I could prepare a resume’ of your best stuff for you show to your clients. I would say that your self perceived level of sophistication would be looked at as childish and strange behavior.



OldGriz
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2023 2:22 pm

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas...”

Post by OldGriz » Sat Oct 25, 2025 4:10 pm

Cataholic wrote:
Sat Oct 25, 2025 2:32 pm
OldGriz wrote:
Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:28 pm
Cataholic wrote:
Sat Oct 25, 2025 11:37 am
ClowderUp wrote:
Sat Oct 25, 2025 8:22 am
Everyone. PlayerRep is a basic troll. Unoriginal and purposely ignorant just to elicit responses. No idea why he's here. He's hated day in and day out on the other site, and that should be plenty for him. But here we are.
Let him troll. It just makes him look like a moron. And even more poetic with PlayerRep is that he is not anonymous as everyone knows who he is real life. What an idiot.
What’d I say wrong?
Your FTC comments are just moronic. The Mercyhurst comment is dumb. The political comments are not welcome. If you think your schtick is cute, it really isn’t. You look dumb. And trolling a rival’s fan board is quite frankly not what one would expect from a “high powered” attorney. I could prepare a resume’ of your best stuff for you show to your clients. I would say that your self perceived level of sophistication would be looked at as childish and strange behavior.
In order:
There’s never been a Griz home game where any “FTC” chant was “ringing out loud” except for Cat-Griz games, but there’s no way you could know that. Sac State did tag Mercyhurst for 49 points — why not just acknowledge it? I did not initiate any political talk, but two Cat fans did, and all I did was agree with them. I am not an attorney. You are sensitive.



User avatar
Bobcat4Ever
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4016
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:26 pm
Location: Bozeman --> Nevada

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....

Post by Bobcat4Ever » Sat Oct 25, 2025 4:40 pm

nutman wrote:
Thu Oct 23, 2025 12:45 pm
I wish Mike Kramer was the coach responding. I believe he would challenge their young president to “show some alacrity”!
I’d pay for an interview by Colter with Jeff Choate.



Cataholic
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7472
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2014 10:09 pm

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas...”

Post by Cataholic » Sat Oct 25, 2025 11:32 pm

OldGriz wrote:
Sat Oct 25, 2025 4:10 pm
Cataholic wrote:
Sat Oct 25, 2025 2:32 pm
OldGriz wrote:
Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:28 pm
Cataholic wrote:
Sat Oct 25, 2025 11:37 am
ClowderUp wrote:
Sat Oct 25, 2025 8:22 am
Everyone. PlayerRep is a basic troll. Unoriginal and purposely ignorant just to elicit responses. No idea why he's here. He's hated day in and day out on the other site, and that should be plenty for him. But here we are.
Let him troll. It just makes him look like a moron. And even more poetic with PlayerRep is that he is not anonymous as everyone knows who he is real life. What an idiot.
What’d I say wrong?
Your FTC comments are just moronic. The Mercyhurst comment is dumb. The political comments are not welcome. If you think your schtick is cute, it really isn’t. You look dumb. And trolling a rival’s fan board is quite frankly not what one would expect from a “high powered” attorney. I could prepare a resume’ of your best stuff for you show to your clients. I would say that your self perceived level of sophistication would be looked at as childish and strange behavior.
In order:
There’s never been a Griz home game where any “FTC” chant was “ringing out loud” except for Cat-Griz games, but there’s no way you could know that. Sac State did tag Mercyhurst for 49 points — why not just acknowledge it? I did not initiate any political talk, but two Cat fans did, and all I did was agree with them. I am not an attorney. You are sensitive.
You denying that you are PlayerRep?

Your FTC position is idiotic. But I am sure you have eyes all over the stadium. The lady specific told me that the Cat-Gris game was the next weekend and the fans started to cheer FTC. I am guessing at the end of the Weber game. Not so hard to visualize.

And yep, Sac State scored 49 on Mercyhurst. Sac State also only managed 3 against South Dakota State. Cats scored 24 against SDSU. Can you acknowledge that?

Lastly, after Colter said the president of the university shouldn’t act like a child, YOU RESPONDED THAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE US SHOULDN’T EITHER. You inserted politics into the discussion. Can you acknowledge that?

Once again, you are doing a great job representing the smallest D1 school in the state. Maybe you guys can show growth in enrollment by including high school seniors in dual credit classes. Oh wait, you are already doing that! :lol:



hokeyfine
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1304
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:18 am

Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....

Post by hokeyfine » Sun Oct 26, 2025 1:48 pm

Hawks86 wrote:
Sat Oct 25, 2025 1:00 pm
There is a little-known codicil in the Bobcat Nation constitution that gives the mods unlimited power to preserve order of the board by ridding posters for the simple reason of being extremely annoying.
Double secret probation? 🤣



Post Reply