Cats vs. UT-Martin 2nd round predictions
Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
-
- Member # Retired
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 4:13 pm
Re: Cats vs. UT-Martin 2nd round predictions
We will get to see how our 2s and 3s do against their 1s starting sometime mid to late 3rd quarter.
Can't make up my mind as to which is better - 55-21 or 48-14, but 34-11 will do.
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 21016
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 6:16 am
- Location: An endless run of moguls
Re: Cats vs. UT-Martin 2nd round predictions
Tough one to predict without knowing the status of Humphrey and Davis. I think Adam Jones, Coon and White could be effective. If neither play, I expect White to get a lot of PT and if not him then Latin-Henley. I would expect MSU to be prepped to pass the ball if Humphrey and Davis are out and those two are good receivers as is Adam Jones.
I believe the weekly presser is going on as I write this, so we should know soon on those two. I think it could be a big game for the defense and special teams. I don't see MSU cracking 40 without H and D, but if the defense and STs make some plays that could get the score up there. Probably in the 30s. Offense will have to have a clean game with low penalties and turnovers.
Lots of back and forth on the UTM run defense, but like MSU being scoffed at for playing a weak schedule, I'm going to give UTM the benefit of the doubt and assume the run D is for real.
With H or D: MSU 42, UTM 13
Without H and D: MSU 31, UTM 13
I believe the weekly presser is going on as I write this, so we should know soon on those two. I think it could be a big game for the defense and special teams. I don't see MSU cracking 40 without H and D, but if the defense and STs make some plays that could get the score up there. Probably in the 30s. Offense will have to have a clean game with low penalties and turnovers.
Lots of back and forth on the UTM run defense, but like MSU being scoffed at for playing a weak schedule, I'm going to give UTM the benefit of the doubt and assume the run D is for real.
With H or D: MSU 42, UTM 13
Without H and D: MSU 31, UTM 13
MSU - 16 team National Champions (most recent 2024); 57 individual National Champions (most recent 2023).
toM StUber
toM StUber
-
- 1st Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1669
- Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 1:13 am
Re: Cats vs. UT-Martin 2nd round predictions
Why the heck does everyone think it's going to be a blowout? We are down to the final 16 in the national playoffs.
I give UT Martin more respect. Cats 31, Skyhawks 21
P.S. by the way we have had a 1-0 mentality all season and I know the players and coaches are sticking to that. No way any of us should look ahead, but if we DO get by UT Martin, I think it's weird that we have the possibility of playing rematches with Idaho and UC Davis in the next two playoff games. I will also be very curious to see how the gris do against SD State. But we gotta take care of business Saturday in Bobcat Stadium. One game at a time. I really hope we have a capacity crowd. Weather is supposed to be ideal.
I give UT Martin more respect. Cats 31, Skyhawks 21
P.S. by the way we have had a 1-0 mentality all season and I know the players and coaches are sticking to that. No way any of us should look ahead, but if we DO get by UT Martin, I think it's weird that we have the possibility of playing rematches with Idaho and UC Davis in the next two playoff games. I will also be very curious to see how the gris do against SD State. But we gotta take care of business Saturday in Bobcat Stadium. One game at a time. I really hope we have a capacity crowd. Weather is supposed to be ideal.
Last edited by aucat on Mon Dec 02, 2024 11:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
- wbtfg
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 14299
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:52 pm
Re: Cats vs. UT-Martin 2nd round predictions
Martin’s strength is their defense. I think they have 6 guys who made 1st team all conf on defense. Additionally, their defensive strength is stopping the run. We should know in the first series or two how we stack up.
Last edited by wbtfg on Mon Dec 02, 2024 11:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Monte eats corn the long way.
- catatac
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9709
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:37 pm
Re: Cats vs. UT-Martin 2nd round predictions
Probably because everyone was worried about when the Cats FINALLY had to play good teams, what was going to happen, then Idaho came along - blowout. UC Davis, blowout. (Not final score but for anyone watching, that was pretty much a blowout until several flukey meltdowns late),then the Griz, blowout.aucat wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:52 amWhy the heck does everyone think it's going to be a blowout? We are down to the final 16 in the national playoffs.
I give UT Martin more respect. Cats 31, Skyhawks 21
P.S. by the way we have had a 1-0 mentality all season and I know the players and coaches are sticking to that. No way any of us should look ahead, but if we DO get by UT Martin, I think it's weird that we have the possibility of playing rematches with Idaho and UC Davis in the next two playoff games. I will also be very curious to see how the gris do against SD State. But we gotta take care of business Saturday in Bobcat Stadium. One game at a time. I really hope we have a capacity crowd. Weather is supposed to be ideal.
We'll see how it goes, but it's going to be a huge uphill battle for them having to come into Bobcat Stadium and make this a game.
Great time to be a BOBCAT!
- cat22[2010]
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:52 am
Re: Cats vs. UT-Martin 2nd round predictions
While I hope we see the backups come the 4th quarter, I agree with you 100% Should not overlook a team and gotta keep that 1-0 mentality!aucat wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:52 amWhy the heck does everyone think it's going to be a blowout? We are down to the final 16 in the national playoffs.
I give UT Martin more respect. Cats 31, Skyhawks 21
P.S. by the way we have had a 1-0 mentality all season and I know the players and coaches are sticking to that. No way any of us should look ahead, but if we DO get by UT Martin, I think it's weird that we have the possibility of playing rematches with Idaho and UC Davis in the next two playoff games. I will also be very curious to see how the gris do against SD State. But we gotta take care of business Saturday in Bobcat Stadium. One game at a time. I really hope we have a capacity crowd. Weather is supposed to be ideal.

- LTown Cat
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 5641
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:26 pm
- Location: Lewistown, MT
- RickRund
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8078
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:08 pm
- Location: Post Falls ID
Re: Cats vs. UT-Martin 2nd round predictions
MSU BOBCATS.......... 43
The Birds.................... 17
Hopefully a chance to rest some 1's.
Massey has the CATS 37-20...
The Birds.................... 17
Hopefully a chance to rest some 1's.
Massey has the CATS 37-20...
msubobcats@outlook.com
Audiatur et altura pars: Let both sides be fairly heard.
Audi alteram partem: listen to the other side.
Audiatur et altura pars: Let both sides be fairly heard.
Audi alteram partem: listen to the other side.
-
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2023 11:05 am
Re: Cats vs. UT-Martin 2nd round predictions
Because this is the best Cats team since at least 1984, outmatch UT Martin at every position, and are playing at home.
Cat fan living in the Bitterroot
Alumni - 2001
Alumni - 2001
- RockyBearCat
- Honorable Mention All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 9:19 pm
-
- 2nd Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:46 pm
-
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3291
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 4:43 pm
Re: Cats vs. UT-Martin 2nd round predictions
Bobcats 37
Skyhawks 13
And when it's all done sky HAWK TUAH on that thing!
Skyhawks 13
And when it's all done sky HAWK TUAH on that thing!
If you're looking for someone with a little authority, I'm your man. I have as little as anyone!
- Bobcat4Ever
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3961
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:26 pm
- Location: Bozeman --> Nevada
Re: Cats vs. UT-Martin 2nd round predictions
Good points. I would give T-Mart less points if H and D play, because the Skyhawks will have poorer field position and less time with the ball. Maybe 42-10 and 31-14.TomCat88 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:48 amTough one to predict without knowing the status of Humphrey and Davis. I think Adam Jones, Coon and White could be effective. If neither play, I expect White to get a lot of PT and if not him then Latin-Henley. I would expect MSU to be prepped to pass the ball if Humphrey and Davis are out and those two are good receivers as is Adam Jones.
I believe the weekly presser is going on as I write this, so we should know soon on those two. I think it could be a big game for the defense and special teams. I don't see MSU cracking 40 without H and D, but if the defense and STs make some plays that could get the score up there. Probably in the 30s. Offense will have to have a clean game with low penalties and turnovers.
Lots of back and forth on the UTM run defense, but like MSU being scoffed at for playing a weak schedule, I'm going to give UTM the benefit of the doubt and assume the run D is for real.
With H or D: MSU 42, UTM 13
Without H and D: MSU 31, UTM 13
-
- Member # Retired
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 10:27 pm
Re: Cats vs. UT-Martin 2nd round predictions
Tom you're going to think I'm crazy, and maybe I am. But watching this line block the inside and outside zone all year, and now having even all the younger backs with some experience running in the system, i almost think it's irrelevant who the feature back is. I think we are a hugely formidable rushing attack with Jones, coon, white, and ULH with Tommy being the key cog. Not to say that Davis and scottre aren't the best backs we have, because they are. But this zone thing is like the late 90s early 2000s broncos IMO. Just plug the next guy in and keep gashing. Think Terrell Davis and then no drop off to Mike Anderson.TomCat88 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:48 amTough one to predict without knowing the status of Humphrey and Davis. I think Adam Jones, Coon and White could be effective. If neither play, I expect White to get a lot of PT and if not him then Latin-Henley. I would expect MSU to be prepped to pass the ball if Humphrey and Davis are out and those two are good receivers as is Adam Jones.
I believe the weekly presser is going on as I write this, so we should know soon on those two. I think it could be a big game for the defense and special teams. I don't see MSU cracking 40 without H and D, but if the defense and STs make some plays that could get the score up there. Probably in the 30s. Offense will have to have a clean game with low penalties and turnovers.
Lots of back and forth on the UTM run defense, but like MSU being scoffed at for playing a weak schedule, I'm going to give UTM the benefit of the doubt and assume the run D is for real.
With H or D: MSU 42, UTM 13
Without H and D: MSU 31, UTM 13
- catsrback76
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9092
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:18 am
- Location: Sitting on the hill looking at the Adriatic!
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 21016
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 6:16 am
- Location: An endless run of moguls
Re: Cats vs. UT-Martin 2nd round predictions
You may very well be right. I just noticed that things ebbed and flowed as H and D went in and out of the last two games. I think if MSU has the guys it uses in practice all week (ie no one gets hurt midway through game) they’ll do well.GoldstoneCat wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 5:29 pmTom you're going to think I'm crazy, and maybe I am. But watching this line block the inside and outside zone all year, and now having even all the younger backs with some experience running in the system, i almost think it's irrelevant who the feature back is. I think we are a hugely formidable rushing attack with Jones, coon, white, and ULH with Tommy being the key cog. Not to say that Davis and scottre aren't the best backs we have, because they are. But this zone thing is like the late 90s early 2000s broncos IMO. Just plug the next guy in and keep gashing. Think Terrell Davis and then no drop off to Mike Anderson.TomCat88 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:48 amTough one to predict without knowing the status of Humphrey and Davis. I think Adam Jones, Coon and White could be effective. If neither play, I expect White to get a lot of PT and if not him then Latin-Henley. I would expect MSU to be prepped to pass the ball if Humphrey and Davis are out and those two are good receivers as is Adam Jones.
I believe the weekly presser is going on as I write this, so we should know soon on those two. I think it could be a big game for the defense and special teams. I don't see MSU cracking 40 without H and D, but if the defense and STs make some plays that could get the score up there. Probably in the 30s. Offense will have to have a clean game with low penalties and turnovers.
Lots of back and forth on the UTM run defense, but like MSU being scoffed at for playing a weak schedule, I'm going to give UTM the benefit of the doubt and assume the run D is for real.
With H or D: MSU 42, UTM 13
Without H and D: MSU 31, UTM 13
Fortunately for MSU it doesn’t have to rely on the run game. UC Davis and UM were plugging things up and Mellott was able to makes passes to offset that. His 7-yarder on third and 7 was huge. The TD to R. Jones was big, the pass to Taco was huge. The latter two weren’t luck, as someone alluded to.

Last edited by TomCat88 on Mon Dec 02, 2024 7:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MSU - 16 team National Champions (most recent 2024); 57 individual National Champions (most recent 2023).
toM StUber
toM StUber
- coloradocat
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6009
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:24 pm
Re: Cats vs. UT-Martin 2nd round predictions
Just like every other week: 1-0
Eastwood, did not make it. Ball out! Recovered, by Montana State!! The Bobcats hold!!! The Bobcats hold!!!
-
- BobcatNation Team Captain
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 8:56 pm
Re: Cats vs. UT-Martin 2nd round predictions
I’m going to get roasted by this but this 1-0 thing is getting overplayed. I love stories and narratives throughout the season but Let’s be honest…this isn’t the first time something like this has been preached nor the last. Vigen didn’t just make this 1-0 deal up this year. The only reason why it has caught so much traction is the fact we are undefeated. Anyways..Go Cats!!
-
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3935
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:14 pm
- Location: Montana
Re: Cats vs. UT-Martin 2nd round predictions
You hit a point I made after Cat Griz. Jones looked much better in 2nd half. Could be they were able to adjust at half to plays he repped more in practice. I'm sure you game plan with specific guys and their skill set. Mid game injuries blow that up sometimes.TomCat88 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 7:31 pmYou may very well be right. I just noticed that things ebbed and flowed as H and D went in and out of the last two games. I think if MSU has the guys it uses in practice all week (ie no one gets hurt midway through game) they’ll do well.GoldstoneCat wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 5:29 pmTom you're going to think I'm crazy, and maybe I am. But watching this line block the inside and outside zone all year, and now having even all the younger backs with some experience running in the system, i almost think it's irrelevant who the feature back is. I think we are a hugely formidable rushing attack with Jones, coon, white, and ULH with Tommy being the key cog. Not to say that Davis and scottre aren't the best backs we have, because they are. But this zone thing is like the late 90s early 2000s broncos IMO. Just plug the next guy in and keep gashing. Think Terrell Davis and then no drop off to Mike Anderson.TomCat88 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:48 amTough one to predict without knowing the status of Humphrey and Davis. I think Adam Jones, Coon and White could be effective. If neither play, I expect White to get a lot of PT and if not him then Latin-Henley. I would expect MSU to be prepped to pass the ball if Humphrey and Davis are out and those two are good receivers as is Adam Jones.
I believe the weekly presser is going on as I write this, so we should know soon on those two. I think it could be a big game for the defense and special teams. I don't see MSU cracking 40 without H and D, but if the defense and STs make some plays that could get the score up there. Probably in the 30s. Offense will have to have a clean game with low penalties and turnovers.
Lots of back and forth on the UTM run defense, but like MSU being scoffed at for playing a weak schedule, I'm going to give UTM the benefit of the doubt and assume the run D is for real.
With H or D: MSU 42, UTM 13
Without H and D: MSU 31, UTM 13
Fortunately for MSU it doesn’t have to rely on the run game. UC Davis and UM were plugging things up and Mellott was able to makes passes to offset that. His 7-yarder on third and 7 was huge. The TD to R. Jones was big, the pass to Taco was huge. The latter two weren’t luck, as someone alluded to.and he’s proven that all year. He was 3 for 3 on the last drive of the first half to get a FG attempt.
Sports is not bigger than life
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 21016
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 6:16 am
- Location: An endless run of moguls
Re: Cats vs. UT-Martin 2nd round predictions
After the 88-yarder he had a good game. Take out the two TD runs and the 26-yarder and he was getting 5 per carry. 7 counting the 26-yarder. He starter the game really well then had a tough time in the middle.tetoncat wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:54 pmYou hit a point I made after Cat Griz. Jones looked much better in 2nd half. Could be they were able to adjust at half to plays he repped more in practice. I'm sure you game plan with specific guys and their skill set. Mid game injuries blow that up sometimes.TomCat88 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 7:31 pmYou may very well be right. I just noticed that things ebbed and flowed as H and D went in and out of the last two games. I think if MSU has the guys it uses in practice all week (ie no one gets hurt midway through game) they’ll do well.GoldstoneCat wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 5:29 pmTom you're going to think I'm crazy, and maybe I am. But watching this line block the inside and outside zone all year, and now having even all the younger backs with some experience running in the system, i almost think it's irrelevant who the feature back is. I think we are a hugely formidable rushing attack with Jones, coon, white, and ULH with Tommy being the key cog. Not to say that Davis and scottre aren't the best backs we have, because they are. But this zone thing is like the late 90s early 2000s broncos IMO. Just plug the next guy in and keep gashing. Think Terrell Davis and then no drop off to Mike Anderson.TomCat88 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:48 amTough one to predict without knowing the status of Humphrey and Davis. I think Adam Jones, Coon and White could be effective. If neither play, I expect White to get a lot of PT and if not him then Latin-Henley. I would expect MSU to be prepped to pass the ball if Humphrey and Davis are out and those two are good receivers as is Adam Jones.
I believe the weekly presser is going on as I write this, so we should know soon on those two. I think it could be a big game for the defense and special teams. I don't see MSU cracking 40 without H and D, but if the defense and STs make some plays that could get the score up there. Probably in the 30s. Offense will have to have a clean game with low penalties and turnovers.
Lots of back and forth on the UTM run defense, but like MSU being scoffed at for playing a weak schedule, I'm going to give UTM the benefit of the doubt and assume the run D is for real.
With H or D: MSU 42, UTM 13
Without H and D: MSU 31, UTM 13
Fortunately for MSU it doesn’t have to rely on the run game. UC Davis and UM were plugging things up and Mellott was able to makes passes to offset that. His 7-yarder on third and 7 was huge. The TD to R. Jones was big, the pass to Taco was huge. The latter two weren’t luck, as someone alluded to.and he’s proven that all year. He was 3 for 3 on the last drive of the first half to get a FG attempt.
Vigen said in his interview today that he expects and wants to get the passing game involved.
MSU - 16 team National Champions (most recent 2024); 57 individual National Champions (most recent 2023).
toM StUber
toM StUber