Personally I'd MUCH rather make them start on offense. Raucous crowd that will be off the charts. Fired up defense just itching to erase the melt down in Missoula last year, Come out super fired up, rattle their QB from the get go, force a punt or a TO and then let Tommy and crew take over. I'm thinking of 2019 where our D took it to them first play of the game, forced a fumble, blowout from then on. Then of course that means they don't get the benefit of that first drive of the second half when a bunch of fans are still out tailgating.GoldstoneCat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 11:19 amI think it's vital to get him moving backwards early and take away his first look. As you say, get them down early to apply pressure. I know Vigen likes to win the "middle 8" around halftime but it would not break my heart to have the ball first in this game and go hang 7.Lord Vigo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 10:53 amThat sample is EW, WEB, and NAU:
EW allowed 37 PPG on defense this year and the Griz scored 52. They allowed 8.3 YPA on the year and Fife was at 8.7.
WEB allowed 29 PPG on defense this year and the Griz scored 48. They allowed 7.3 YPA on the year and Fife was at 8.4.
NAU allowed 18 PPG on defense this year and the Griz scored 31. They allowed 6.0 YPA on the year and Fife was at 7.4.
They were definitely better when Fife played the whole game. That stands to reason-- KAY is not good. But it's also a small sample and two of those games were at home and two of them were against really bad defenses.
When it looked like they were going to start KAY, I was predicting that MSU's defense would outscore the UM offense.
With Fife, they will put some points up. However, as long as the Cats' offense does what they should, UM won't be able to keep up. And the more they play from behind, the uglier it will get. The Griz line has not been good this year and the Cats will be the best front they've faced, especially in the pass rush department.
Fife is strongest when he can hit his back foot and kick the ball out to his first read. So messing with his eyes is important, and stopping the run to neutralize play action is also. I like the match up for the defense but we will need to stop the run without loading the box.
Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
- catatac
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9710
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:37 pm
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
Great time to be a BOBCAT!
-
- Member # Retired
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 10:27 pm
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
Yeah you're not wrong. And if you get them off the field and then go score you are on track to gain huge momentum. But I think you can also seize momentum with an opening drive td and never give it back. We 100% should defer if we win the toss but I'm good on offense first too this week when we feel like we have such a physical mismatch.catatac wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:03 pmPersonally I'd MUCH rather make them start on offense. Raucous crowd that will be off the charts. Fired up defense just itching to erase the melt down in Missoula last year, Come out super fired up, rattle their QB from the get go, force a punt or a TO and then let Tommy and crew take over. I'm thinking of 2019 where our D took it to them first play of the game, forced a fumble, blowout from then on. Then of course that means they don't get the benefit of that first drive of the second half when a bunch of fans are still out tailgating.GoldstoneCat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 11:19 amI think it's vital to get him moving backwards early and take away his first look. As you say, get them down early to apply pressure. I know Vigen likes to win the "middle 8" around halftime but it would not break my heart to have the ball first in this game and go hang 7.Lord Vigo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 10:53 amThat sample is EW, WEB, and NAU:
EW allowed 37 PPG on defense this year and the Griz scored 52. They allowed 8.3 YPA on the year and Fife was at 8.7.
WEB allowed 29 PPG on defense this year and the Griz scored 48. They allowed 7.3 YPA on the year and Fife was at 8.4.
NAU allowed 18 PPG on defense this year and the Griz scored 31. They allowed 6.0 YPA on the year and Fife was at 7.4.
They were definitely better when Fife played the whole game. That stands to reason-- KAY is not good. But it's also a small sample and two of those games were at home and two of them were against really bad defenses.
When it looked like they were going to start KAY, I was predicting that MSU's defense would outscore the UM offense.
With Fife, they will put some points up. However, as long as the Cats' offense does what they should, UM won't be able to keep up. And the more they play from behind, the uglier it will get. The Griz line has not been good this year and the Cats will be the best front they've faced, especially in the pass rush department.
Fife is strongest when he can hit his back foot and kick the ball out to his first read. So messing with his eyes is important, and stopping the run to neutralize play action is also. I like the match up for the defense but we will need to stop the run without loading the box.
-
- Member # Retired
- Posts: 2158
- Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2014 9:50 am
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
I guess UND can get pretty loud in a small, confined space but that didn't go well for them. Especially in the second half when North Dakota got it rolling.FA_Q_M wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 2:23 pmSomething off the stat sheet that may play a critical role this Saturday is how many big, hostile crowds have the gris played in front of. This will be BY FAR the biggest, loudest anti-gris crowd they'll face this year. Couple the crowd with those avg rushing stats and it makes me think the gwisslies are in for a long day.
Brewer/Owner Copper Furrow Brewing
-
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2021 3:01 am
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
Exactly. And that was inside. On Saturday, it's gonna be LOUD and cold. Gris have a distinct uphill battle.Prodigal Cat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:14 pmI guess UND can get pretty loud in a small, confined space but that didn't go well for them. Especially in the second half when North Dakota got it rolling.FA_Q_M wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 2:23 pmSomething off the stat sheet that may play a critical role this Saturday is how many big, hostile crowds have the gris played in front of. This will be BY FAR the biggest, loudest anti-gris crowd they'll face this year. Couple the crowd with those avg rushing stats and it makes me think the gwisslies are in for a long day.
the ghost of cat_stache_fever
-
- 1st Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1827
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:40 am
- Location: North Idaho
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
Where you from? 45 at kickoff is what I see. That is not cold!FA_Q_M wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 1:08 pmExactly. And that was inside. On Saturday, it's gonna be LOUD and cold. Gris have a distinct uphill battle.Prodigal Cat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:14 pmI guess UND can get pretty loud in a small, confined space but that didn't go well for them. Especially in the second half when North Dakota got it rolling.FA_Q_M wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 2:23 pmSomething off the stat sheet that may play a critical role this Saturday is how many big, hostile crowds have the gris played in front of. This will be BY FAR the biggest, loudest anti-gris crowd they'll face this year. Couple the crowd with those avg rushing stats and it makes me think the gwisslies are in for a long day.
"Confidence is contagious. So is a lack of confidence." Vince Lombardi
-
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2021 3:01 am
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
Ha!! Great Falls, MT....Long Time Cat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 1:15 pmWhere you from? 45 at kickoff is what I see. That is not cold!FA_Q_M wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 1:08 pmExactly. And that was inside. On Saturday, it's gonna be LOUD and cold. Gris have a distinct uphill battle.Prodigal Cat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:14 pmI guess UND can get pretty loud in a small, confined space but that didn't go well for them. Especially in the second half when North Dakota got it rolling.FA_Q_M wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 2:23 pmSomething off the stat sheet that may play a critical role this Saturday is how many big, hostile crowds have the gris played in front of. This will be BY FAR the biggest, loudest anti-gris crowd they'll face this year. Couple the crowd with those avg rushing stats and it makes me think the gwisslies are in for a long day.
Guess i never saw the forecast. just assumed it'd be chilly. We can agree it will be loud.
the ghost of cat_stache_fever
- catatac
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9710
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:37 pm
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
Ya, 100%. It will NOT be cold but it WILL be LOUD!
Great time to be a BOBCAT!
- snarf
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 9:17 am
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
It might not be cold, but overall forecast is not looking great. It’s football in Montana in November.FA_Q_M wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 1:26 pmHa!! Great Falls, MT....Long Time Cat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 1:15 pmWhere you from? 45 at kickoff is what I see. That is not cold!FA_Q_M wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 1:08 pmExactly. And that was inside. On Saturday, it's gonna be LOUD and cold. Gris have a distinct uphill battle.Prodigal Cat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:14 pmI guess UND can get pretty loud in a small, confined space but that didn't go well for them. Especially in the second half when North Dakota got it rolling.FA_Q_M wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 2:23 pmSomething off the stat sheet that may play a critical role this Saturday is how many big, hostile crowds have the gris played in front of. This will be BY FAR the biggest, loudest anti-gris crowd they'll face this year. Couple the crowd with those avg rushing stats and it makes me think the gwisslies are in for a long day.
Guess i never saw the forecast. just assumed it'd be chilly. We can agree it will be loud.
- WalkOn79
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3431
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:47 pm
- Location: Bozeman
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
My butt is in the seat for this game to start the 3rd.catatac wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:03 pmPersonally I'd MUCH rather make them start on offense. Raucous crowd that will be off the charts. Fired up defense just itching to erase the melt down in Missoula last year, Come out super fired up, rattle their QB from the get go, force a punt or a TO and then let Tommy and crew take over. I'm thinking of 2019 where our D took it to them first play of the game, forced a fumble, blowout from then on. Then of course that means they don't get the benefit of that first drive of the second half when a bunch of fans are still out tailgating.GoldstoneCat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 11:19 amI think it's vital to get him moving backwards early and take away his first look. As you say, get them down early to apply pressure. I know Vigen likes to win the "middle 8" around halftime but it would not break my heart to have the ball first in this game and go hang 7.Lord Vigo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 10:53 amThat sample is EW, WEB, and NAU:
EW allowed 37 PPG on defense this year and the Griz scored 52. They allowed 8.3 YPA on the year and Fife was at 8.7.
WEB allowed 29 PPG on defense this year and the Griz scored 48. They allowed 7.3 YPA on the year and Fife was at 8.4.
NAU allowed 18 PPG on defense this year and the Griz scored 31. They allowed 6.0 YPA on the year and Fife was at 7.4.
They were definitely better when Fife played the whole game. That stands to reason-- KAY is not good. But it's also a small sample and two of those games were at home and two of them were against really bad defenses.
When it looked like they were going to start KAY, I was predicting that MSU's defense would outscore the UM offense.
With Fife, they will put some points up. However, as long as the Cats' offense does what they should, UM won't be able to keep up. And the more they play from behind, the uglier it will get. The Griz line has not been good this year and the Cats will be the best front they've faced, especially in the pass rush department.
Fife is strongest when he can hit his back foot and kick the ball out to his first read. So messing with his eyes is important, and stopping the run to neutralize play action is also. I like the match up for the defense but we will need to stop the run without loading the box.
"One of the greatest feelings in the world, moving someone from point A to point B against their will"
Mitch Brott - 2019 Cat / Griz
Mitch Brott - 2019 Cat / Griz
- RickRund
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8080
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:08 pm
- Location: Post Falls ID
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
The forecast I am seeing, Wunderground, says 43* with rain starting at 11. Who knows, weather forecasts are like political polls.Long Time Cat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 1:15 pmWhere you from? 45 at kickoff is what I see. That is not cold!FA_Q_M wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 1:08 pmExactly. And that was inside. On Saturday, it's gonna be LOUD and cold. Gris have a distinct uphill battle.Prodigal Cat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:14 pmI guess UND can get pretty loud in a small, confined space but that didn't go well for them. Especially in the second half when North Dakota got it rolling.FA_Q_M wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 2:23 pmSomething off the stat sheet that may play a critical role this Saturday is how many big, hostile crowds have the gris played in front of. This will be BY FAR the biggest, loudest anti-gris crowd they'll face this year. Couple the crowd with those avg rushing stats and it makes me think the gwisslies are in for a long day.
Football weather.
msubobcats@outlook.com
Audiatur et altura pars: Let both sides be fairly heard.
Audi alteram partem: listen to the other side.
Audiatur et altura pars: Let both sides be fairly heard.
Audi alteram partem: listen to the other side.
- cats2506
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9493
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:35 pm
- Location: Lewistown
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
NWS is saying high 30's, 8 mph & 80% chance of precipRickRund wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2024 10:29 amThe forecast I am seeing, Wunderground, says 43* with rain starting at 11. Who knows, weather forecasts are like political polls.Long Time Cat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 1:15 pmWhere you from? 45 at kickoff is what I see. That is not cold!FA_Q_M wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 1:08 pmExactly. And that was inside. On Saturday, it's gonna be LOUD and cold. Gris have a distinct uphill battle.Prodigal Cat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:14 pmI guess UND can get pretty loud in a small, confined space but that didn't go well for them. Especially in the second half when North Dakota got it rolling.FA_Q_M wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2024 2:23 pmSomething off the stat sheet that may play a critical role this Saturday is how many big, hostile crowds have the gris played in front of. This will be BY FAR the biggest, loudest anti-gris crowd they'll face this year. Couple the crowd with those avg rushing stats and it makes me think the gwisslies are in for a long day.
Football weather.
PlayerRep wrote:The point is not the record of the teams UM beat, it's the quality and record of the teams UM almost beat.
- Lord Vigo
- 1st Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1760
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2021 6:38 pm
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
So is the weather good because it makes it harder to pass or is it bad because it kind of acts as an equalizer for two teams that aren't really equal?
- cats2506
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9493
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:35 pm
- Location: Lewistown
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
Traditional thinking is that bad weather is an advantage for a running team, especially if it is straight up running without a lot of cuts on the edge. I think this definitely plays into an MSU advantage.
Bad weather definitely makes for a tighter scoring game and greater possibility of turnovers, which translates to a um advantage.
I think with MSU's run game and a good punter the overall advantage is MSU in a bad weather game.
PlayerRep wrote:The point is not the record of the teams UM beat, it's the quality and record of the teams UM almost beat.
-
- BobcatNation Redshirt
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 8:03 pm
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
Loose footing is in favor of the receiver. Defensive backs have trouble reacting quickly without falling. So, you can argue a good passing team will do just fine as long as the wind is not blowing hard.
- catatac
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9710
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:37 pm
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
Good post, that's what I was going to say. You can't just say, bad weather hurts the passing game or vice versa or whatever. It all depends on what you mean by bad weather. If it's poor footing\field conditions you are exactly correct in that this favors the passing game. If it's raining\snowing however, tougher to catch a slick ball.
Great time to be a BOBCAT!
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 21026
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 6:16 am
- Location: An endless run of moguls
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
Bad weather also effects the quarterback's ability to throw the ball. If the ball is wet, it's slick and hard to grip. If the playing surface is slippery, it's hard to get feet set. Poor footing may favor receivers, but not QBs.catatac wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2024 2:37 pmGood post, that's what I was going to say. You can't just say, bad weather hurts the passing game or vice versa or whatever. It all depends on what you mean by bad weather. If it's poor footing\field conditions you are exactly correct in that this favors the passing game. If it's raining\snowing however, tougher to catch a slick ball.
The forecast I'm looking at looks good.
MSU - 16 team National Champions (most recent 2024); 57 individual National Champions (most recent 2023).
toM StUber
toM StUber
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6762
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:12 pm
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
This game could be played on the moon and I'd still love us by 3td'sTomCat88 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2024 3:47 pmBad weather also effects the quarterback's ability to throw the ball. If the ball is wet, it's slick and hard to grip. If the playing surface is slippery, it's hard to get feet set. Poor footing may favor receivers, but not QBs.catatac wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2024 2:37 pmGood post, that's what I was going to say. You can't just say, bad weather hurts the passing game or vice versa or whatever. It all depends on what you mean by bad weather. If it's poor footing\field conditions you are exactly correct in that this favors the passing game. If it's raining\snowing however, tougher to catch a slick ball.
The forecast I'm looking at looks good.
-
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3935
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:14 pm
- Location: Montana
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
Bad footing killed the Cats a couple years ago at SDSUilovethecats wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2024 4:03 pmThis game could be played on the moon and I'd still love us by 3td'sTomCat88 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2024 3:47 pmBad weather also effects the quarterback's ability to throw the ball. If the ball is wet, it's slick and hard to grip. If the playing surface is slippery, it's hard to get feet set. Poor footing may favor receivers, but not QBs.catatac wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2024 2:37 pmGood post, that's what I was going to say. You can't just say, bad weather hurts the passing game or vice versa or whatever. It all depends on what you mean by bad weather. If it's poor footing\field conditions you are exactly correct in that this favors the passing game. If it's raining\snowing however, tougher to catch a slick ball.
The forecast I'm looking at looks good.
Sports is not bigger than life
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6762
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:12 pm
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
Played a part for sure. But SDSU played on the same field. I’m also of the belief that that SDSU team at home was much better than this UM team on the road.tetoncat wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2024 7:11 pmBad footing killed the Cats a couple years ago at SDSUilovethecats wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2024 4:03 pmThis game could be played on the moon and I'd still love us by 3td'sTomCat88 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2024 3:47 pmBad weather also effects the quarterback's ability to throw the ball. If the ball is wet, it's slick and hard to grip. If the playing surface is slippery, it's hard to get feet set. Poor footing may favor receivers, but not QBs.catatac wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2024 2:37 pmGood post, that's what I was going to say. You can't just say, bad weather hurts the passing game or vice versa or whatever. It all depends on what you mean by bad weather. If it's poor footing\field conditions you are exactly correct in that this favors the passing game. If it's raining\snowing however, tougher to catch a slick ball.
The forecast I'm looking at looks good.
- Lord Vigo
- 1st Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1760
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2021 6:38 pm
Re: Cat/Griz Statistical Comparison
That was different though. That was a literal ice rink. I have never seen anything else quite like it.tetoncat wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2024 7:11 pmBad footing killed the Cats a couple years ago at SDSUilovethecats wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2024 4:03 pmThis game could be played on the moon and I'd still love us by 3td'sTomCat88 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2024 3:47 pmBad weather also effects the quarterback's ability to throw the ball. If the ball is wet, it's slick and hard to grip. If the playing surface is slippery, it's hard to get feet set. Poor footing may favor receivers, but not QBs.catatac wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2024 2:37 pmGood post, that's what I was going to say. You can't just say, bad weather hurts the passing game or vice versa or whatever. It all depends on what you mean by bad weather. If it's poor footing\field conditions you are exactly correct in that this favors the passing game. If it's raining\snowing however, tougher to catch a slick ball.
The forecast I'm looking at looks good.