The talent level in Missoula is just sick this year

tetoncat · Post by **tetoncat** » Fri Jul 28, 2006 5:24 pm

Jah, the games we lost last year typically were a cause of having no running game and having to rely so heavily on Lulay and the pass. It did not work. At PSU our defense had several key guys injured and when they came back we dominated. Except at EWU. but those guys were pretty good offensively I would say don't you agree.

With you claiming that your offfense is so good, it is based on a transfer QB and at least a couple of new receivers. Why is that any different than the situation the CATS are in. We at least have a system QB that has a chance to start.

MSU01 · Post by **MSU01** » Fri Jul 28, 2006 7:34 pm

My goodness, he was being serious with that? I thought it was supposed to be funny. Give me a break...screw the BCS, let's just put the Griz straight into the Fiesta Bowl.

JahGriz · Post by **JahGriz** » Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:18 pm

That is the first I've heard a comment on my avitar...you don't like it?

As to me saying how "good" the Griz O will be, I don't think I've said. I have said, and do think, it will be significantly better than last year. Last year the playmakers were in short supply. This year we've go all our WR's back with extras, minus Talmage, who was average at best last year. We've got ball all our QB's plus some. Waller won't be back at RB, but Lex will be, plus some transfers, and young guys working their way thru the ranks.
OL is a bit of a question mark, but last year's OL wasn't that stellar. I like the big athletic guys we've got and think there will be no drop off.

I have no problem with the cats, and if you notice I say good things where I see good things. But I see quite a few cat fans who seem to think your team will be better than last year, and I just don't see it, YET. If that draws some spite from you guys, I'll have to deal with it.

Your O will be in a very similar place to what ours was last year and you saw the Griz O last year. Your OC will probably adjust to it more, but that isn't proven.

This is no place for a post like this though, but I'm not that good at smack.

GOKATS · Post by **GOKATS** » Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:41 pm

GOKATS · Post by **GOKATS** » Fri Jul 28, 2006 9:01 pm

JahGriz wrote:
That is the first I've heard a comment on my avitar...you don't like it?
Winky, Blinky & Nod

As to me saying how "good" the Griz O will be, I don't think I've said. I have said, and do think, it will be significantly better than last year. Last year the playmakers were in short supply. This year we've go all our WR's back with extras, minus Talmage, who was average at best last year. We've got ball all our QB's plus some. Waller won't be back at RB, but Lex will be, plus some transfers, and young guys working their way thru the ranks.

All we've heard for months is Swogger to Chambers equals the fiz going to the NC.

OL is a bit of a question mark, but last year's OL wasn't that stellar. I like the big athletic guys we've got and think there will be no drop off.

A bit of a question mark? The OL is without a doubt the biggest question mark in the griz 'O'.

The Iowa game should more than answer that question

I have no problem with the cats, and if you notice I say good things where I see good things. But I see quite a few cat fans who seem to think your team will be better than last year, and I just don't see it, YET. If that draws some spite from you guys, I'll have to deal with it.

Your O will be in a very similar place to what ours was last year and you saw the Griz O last year. Your OC will probably adjust to it more, but that isn't proven.

There is no way in hell that the 'Cats 'O' could be as pathetic as what the fiz did last year.

This is no place for a post like this though, but I'm not that good at smack.

JahGriz · Post by **JahGriz** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 3:29 pm

GOKATS wrote:
JahGriz wrote:
That is the first I've heard a comment on my avitar...you don't like it?
Winky, Blinky & Nod

As to me saying how "good" the Griz O will be, I don't think I've said. I have said, and do think, it will be significantly better than last year. Last year the playmakers were in short supply. This year we've go all our WR's back with extras, minus Talmage, who was average at best last year. We've got ball all our QB's plus some. Waller won't be back at RB, but Lex will be, plus some transfers, and young guys working their way thru the ranks.

All we've heard for months is Swogger to Chambers equals the fiz going to the NC.

OL is a bit of a question mark, but last year's OL wasn't that stellar. I like the big athletic guys we've got and think there will be no drop off.

A bit of a question mark? The OL is without a doubt the biggest question mark in the griz 'O'.

The Iowa game should more than answer that question

I have no problem with the cats, and if you notice I say good things where I see good things. But I see quite a few cat fans who seem to think your team will be better than last year, and I just don't see it, YET. If that draws some spite from you guys, I'll have to deal with it.

Your O will be in a very similar place to what ours was last year and you saw the Griz O last year. Your OC will probably adjust to it more, but that isn't proven.

There is no way in hell that the 'Cats 'O' could be as pathetic as what the fiz did last year.

This is no place for a post like this though, but I'm not that good at smack.

You are grouping me with other Griz fans, or mistaking me for someone else. Let me help you out, do a search on post by JahGriz on any board, and find where I've said Swogger to Chambers equals NC. In fact, I've said very early on that Chambers would not be a huge factor this year even if he played.

I'm out of this smack BS because you can't lay down a single fact, and statements made as fact, are flat out bullsheet. Typical cat fan assuming if one Griz fans says something, every Griz fan must believe it.
As I've said before, not all Chinese people are good at math, not all Blacks are athletic, not all Whites can't jump. But you go on basing your opinion of a group based on the actions/words of one member of the group. But I call that ignorance.