Cats showing signs of a two headed monster. (GROVES)

Hell's Bells · Post by **Hell's Bells** » Wed Nov 09, 2005 11:26 am

thuss wrote:Okay.

However if you look at my post I said the bobcats Run Game is back. I didn't say that groves is the second coming of Ryan Johnson and I didn't say that we now have the most dominating rushing offense in the entire nation. I simply said "cats showing signs of two headed monster" and then welcomed back the run game. It has been a while since we have had a 100 yd rushing RB and 3td to go with it.

UMclass2002 blew my statement way out of proportion. He thought I was saying that Groves deserves to be on the Payton watch list.

I was being optimistic. 100 yds and 3td from a running back against any team is a good sign of things. Don't be a pessimist.

groves will be on the peyton watch just not this year
btw lets see how well he does against eastern before we jump the gun about our rushing attack this year

hey who was it that predicted that groves will be the starter by the end of the year? good job

El_Gato · Post by **El_Gato** » Wed Nov 09, 2005 11:36 am

El_Gato wrote:...I predict that Groves will be our starting tailback by season's end.

Sept 11, 2005

El_Gato wrote:...Groves IS the future of our running game plus we should be getting Bass back for the stretch run.

October 16, 2005

Thanks for remembering that, HB. <patting myself on the back>

Hell's Bells · Post by **Hell's Bells** » Wed Nov 09, 2005 11:38 am

El_Gato wrote:
El_Gato wrote:...I predict that Groves will be our starting tailback by season's end.
Sept 11, 2005

El_Gato wrote:...Groves IS the future of our running game plus we should be getting Bass back for the stretch run.
October 16, 2005

Thanks for remembering that, HB. <patting myself on the back>

got to give credit when credit is due...

bleedbluegold · Post by **bleedbluegold** » Wed Nov 09, 2005 11:31 pm

El Gato knows

UMclassof2002 · Post by **UMclassof2002** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 8:02 pm

UMclassof2002 wrote:
thuss wrote:If your point is Sac States d sucks than my point is the whole entire team for NAU sucks.
And my point is that Montana vs. NAU has nothing to do with Groves running the football.

thuss wrote:I guess we'll see how many yds the giz o puts up against the sac st. defense this weekend
When Lex hangs 150 on them, it will only serve to underscore my point that Sac State is not a good barometer to guage offensive ground gaining ability.

Sac State still sucks

Hell's Bells · Post by **Hell's Bells** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 8:29 pm

UMclassof2002 wrote:
UMclassof2002 wrote:
thuss wrote:If your point is Sac States d sucks than my point is the whole entire team for NAU sucks.
And my point is that Montana vs. NAU has nothing to do with Groves running the football.

thuss wrote:I guess we'll see how many yds the giz o puts up against the sac st. defense this weekend
When Lex hangs 150 on them, it will only serve to underscore my point that Sac State is not a good barometer to guage offensive ground gaining ability.

Sac State still sucks

it was a very booring game. but yet lex had his 150 after a 4th quarter long run

Hell's Bells · Post by **Hell's Bells** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:46 am

bearBAC wrote:Heading into the playoffs.
Lex aught to do fine in next weeks pratice game / Bye week.
Any Idea who the kittens play on thankgiving weekend?

Oh thats right you're home alone playing with your self!

Someone needs to help the "sHeepturd" find his.

will the griz make the playoffs after being a third place big sky team

1) eastern *beat us and you*
2) cats - *got beat by eastern yet beat the griz*
3) you

jagur1 · Post by **jagur1** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:36 am

Hells I'll have to defer to you on the 3rd place thing. Since, the cats know so much more about 3rd place than the Griz do.

? Question for anyone who went to Chenney. Did you get the, "Over rated cheer?" Stings doesn't it.

WalkOn79 · Post by **WalkOn79** » Mon Nov 21, 2005 2:14 pm

UMclassof2002 wrote:
CelticCat wrote:
UMclassof2002 wrote:
thuss wrote:I was once told by an insider on the FB team that groves was unfamiliar with the Cat offense.

If that was the case he sure picked it up this weekend.

Dude, even Imaho State had a 100 yard rusher against Sac State.
ISU averages 170 rushing yards per game (3 less than the Griz) so I'm not sure if you are trying to insult ISU or Sac or what exaclty that meant.

I'm saying ISU has only had a 100 yard rusher in three games this year and they were all against shi tty defenses, one of which was Sac State. Therefore, I wouldn't be trumpeting the return of the ground game based on one performance against said Hornets.

Sorry, I know this is an old post, but how do you feel about the MSU running game now?

UMclassof2002 · Post by **UMclassof2002** » Mon Nov 21, 2005 2:23 pm

WalkOn79 wrote:
UMclassof2002 wrote:
CelticCat wrote:
UMclassof2002 wrote:
thuss wrote:I was once told by an insider on the FB team that groves was unfamiliar with the Cat offense.

If that was the case he sure picked it up this weekend.

Dude, even Imaho State had a 100 yard rusher against Sac State.
ISU averages 170 rushing yards per game (3 less than the Griz) so I'm not sure if you are trying to insult ISU or Sac or what exaclty that meant.

I'm saying ISU has only had a 100 yard rusher in three games this year and they were all against shi tty defenses, one of which was Sac State. Therefore, I wouldn't be trumpeting the return of the ground game based on one performance against said Hornets.
Sorry, I know this is an old post, but how do you feel about the MSU running game now?

Worse.

CARDIAC_CATS · Post by **CARDIAC_CATS** » Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:03 pm

jagur1 wrote:Hells I'll have to defer to you on the 3rd place thing. Since, the cats know so much more about 3rd place than the Griz do.

? Question for anyone who went to Chenney. Did you get the, "Over rated cheer?" Stings doesn't it.

Did you hear it this weekend?

I think it applies more to the Griz now

Cats showing signs of a two headed monster. (GROVES)

Re: Cats showing signs of a two headed monster. (GROVES)

Re: Cats showing signs of a two headed monster. (GROVES)