gameday thread...msu v. sac state

profisme · Post by **profisme** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:32 pm

A special teams mistake on the opponents' first possession. Reminds a person of the start of last year's game against Sac. St. Except we didn't score our first possession last year.

El_Gato · Post by **El_Gato** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:32 pm

OK,

I've watched this 3-4 crap enough this season; IT DOESN'T WORK THE WAY WE ARE PLAYING IT.

Our 3-4 is really a 5-2 and when opposing teams get their tailback past the line of scrimmage, we have NO ONE to make a stop.

I really can't believe that Kwiatkowski CONTINUES to put the OLB's right on the line of scrimmage; THAT IS THE BIGGEST REASON THAT WE SUCK AT RUN D. OUR RUN DEFENSE HAS 1 "LAYER", AT THE LINE OF SCRIMMAGE. ONCE A TAILBACK GETS A YARD OR 2 DOWNFIELD, IT'S USUALLY WIDE OPEN FOR HIM, JUST LIKE ON THAT F#@#KING TD RUN.

anacondagriz · Post by **anacondagriz** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:32 pm

Did Sac score?

gtapp · Post by **gtapp** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:34 pm

Bay Area Cat wrote:Can this perhaps be the wake-up call we need every damn game before they turn it on? Let's not take this one to the last minute like every other game.

It wouldn't be the Cats unless it was close!!

Post by **rtb** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:34 pm

El_Gato wrote:OK,

I've watched this 3-4 crap enough this season; IT DOESN'T WORK THE WAY WE ARE PLAYING IT.

Our 3-4 is really a 5-2 and when opposing teams get their tailback past the line of scrimmage, we have NO ONE to make a stop.

I really can't believe that Kwiatkowski CONTINUES to put the OLB's right on the line of scrimmage; THAT IS THE BIGGEST REASON THAT WE SUCK AT RUN D. OUR RUN DEFENSE HAS 1 "LAYER", AT THE LINE OF SCRIMMAGE. ONCE A TAILBACK GETS A YARD OR 2 DOWNFIELD, IT'S USUALLY WIDE OPEN FOR HIM, JUST LIKE ON THAT F#@#KING TD RUN.

Exactly, a traditional 3-4 with the LBs back is great at stopping the run usually, but this 3-4 is not good!

Nice catch it sounds like...lets keep putting points on the board..our D will get some stops.

gtapp · Post by **gtapp** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:34 pm

profisme wrote:A special teams mistake on the opponents' first possession. Reminds a person of the start of last year's game against Sac. St. Except we didn't score our first possession last year.

Yes we did! Exactly like this year.

El_Gato · Post by **El_Gato** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:35 pm

Another comment:

That personal foul on the ROUGHING the kicker is simply another black-eye for the pathetic Big Sky refs. ON THE REPLAY, IT'S DOUBTFUL THAT DALY EVEN MADE CONTACT WITH THE STUPID KICKER, LET ALONE "ROUGHED" HIM.

2 drives in and the F@#$KING refs already have stepped on their d@#ks BIG TIME...

Post by **SonomaCat** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:36 pm

El_Gato wrote:Another comment:

That personal foul on the ROUGHING the kicker is simply another black-eye for the pathetic Big Sky refs. ON THE REPLAY, IT'S DOUBTFUL THAT DALY EVEN MADE CONTACT WITH THE STUPID KICKER, LET ALONE "ROUGHED" HIM.

2 drives in and the F@#$KING refs already have stepped on their d@#ks BIG TIME...

There was another penalty on the play against the Cats as well, so they made doubly-sure on that one ... they even had a back-up plan.

Post by **rtb** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:36 pm

El Gato...is Travis way off target on these overshots?

gtapp · Post by **gtapp** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:39 pm

Is it close to a sellout? Did everyone show up?

Post by **rtb** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:41 pm

It is so nice to at least have a reliable kicker these days. I can't remember the last time I was comfortable with us even attempting more than about a 15 yard field goal.

profisme · Post by **profisme** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:42 pm

Another stalled drive for a FG. When will Bailey pull out the draw play to go along with the 71 pass plays in a row. Of course that is an exaggeration, but you get the point. The draw would be really effective today against a blitzing defense.

El_Gato · Post by **El_Gato** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:43 pm

No, TL looks good so far, just the 1 overthrow that I've seen

On 3rd & 3 just now, I thought he could've run for the first but instead threw the ball away. It looked like he had a lane but I'll give him credit for making sure we got the 3...

profisme · Post by **profisme** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:44 pm

Good play by Epi King

gtapp · Post by **gtapp** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:44 pm

I still don't get burning a redshirt year so these players can be on the kick team.

grizband · Post by **grizband** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:44 pm

Can someone tell me why that wasn't intentional grounding on the play before that field goal? Was Lulay out of the pocket? Cuz there was no one within 5 yards of where he threw the ball (unless I missed something, which I could have).

soldier668 · Post by **soldier668** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:45 pm

we need to get a three and out here, then score and get a litte bit of a buffer

soldier668 · Post by **soldier668** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:45 pm

nice stop Clive Lowe

El_Gato · Post by **El_Gato** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:46 pm

band, are you watching the game?

He was clearly outside the tackle and threw it out of the endzone; that is legal now.

Post by **rtb** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:46 pm

grizband wrote:Can someone tell me why that wasn't intentional grounding on the play before that field goal? Was Lulay out of the pocket? Cuz there was no one within 5 yards of where he threw the ball (unless I missed something, which I could have).

I believe he threw it out the back of the end zone...that isn't illegal.