AP Spin Cycle on Hauck

The place for news, information and discussion of athletics at "other" schools.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

crazycat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4432
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 6:03 pm

AP Spin Cycle on Hauck

Post by crazycat » Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:30 pm

http://www.greatfallstribune.com/apps/p ... 006/SPORTS

They made sure they filled this story, which is supposed to be about the UM admin. supporting Hauck, will a detailed recap of all the MSU problems.
Ricky Gatewood was arrested on drug charges. Gatewood was the sixth current or former MSU football player arrested. Of those, one has been charged with murder along with a former MSU basketball player.
Another factor in Kramer's firing was the fact that the football team was losing scholarships for failing to meet NCAA academic standards.

Montana's football teams have fared well in the classroom as well as on the field and aren't on the verge of changing coaches.
Never mind that only one player was currently on the team, they have it down as the 'sixth current or former...' Just seems like the AP has gone out of its way to continue mentioning MSU's problems whenever UM has trouble. Just about every story by the AP on UM's Wilson this summer had some mention of the crimes at MSU.



Au Blue
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1251
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 5:39 pm

Re: AP Spin Cycle on Hauck

Post by Au Blue » Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:44 pm

crazycat wrote:http://www.greatfallstribune.com/apps/p ... 006/SPORTS

They made sure they filled this story, which is supposed to be about the UM admin. supporting Hauck, will a detailed recap of all the MSU problems.
Ricky Gatewood was arrested on drug charges. Gatewood was the sixth current or former MSU football player arrested. Of those, one has been charged with murder along with a former MSU basketball player.
Another factor in Kramer's firing was the fact that the football team was losing scholarships for failing to meet NCAA academic standards.

Montana's football teams have fared well in the classroom as well as on the field and aren't on the verge of changing coaches.
Never mind that only one player was currently on the team, they have it down as the 'sixth current or former...' Just seems like the AP has gone out of its way to continue mentioning MSU's problems whenever UM has trouble. Just about every story by the AP on UM's Wilson this summer had some mention of the crimes at MSU.
I hate it too but in all fairness had it happened at UM first and MSU second, UM would have been mentioned in all subsequent articles. But it sounds like Coulson could have a future with the AP. Just keep dredging up old news to fill a column.



User avatar
MSU Toddler
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1943
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:19 am
Location: Helena, MT

Post by MSU Toddler » Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:47 pm

"As long as I'm convinced of that and convinced that he's doing the job that he was hired to do, then I'm going to be supportive of him," Dennison said.
as long as BH continues to lose to the Cats, i'm supportive of him too.

on a serious note: it is disturbing that MSU continues to be mentioned, but heck - those things did happen just recently. my personal opinion is that the Cats are headed in the right direction now, but not so sure of UM given recent events. i know i may take heat for this, but would rather see a decent program with kids graduating and doing the right thing - then one winning at all costs and have troubles. there are some damn fine kids playing for both teams and it sucks that they all get the black eye.

also, i don't believe BH will be as a hot comodity as he could have been given these events.


Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.

User avatar
cats2506
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 9656
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Lewistown

Post by cats2506 » Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:01 pm

MSU Toddler wrote:
"As long as I'm convinced of that and convinced that he's doing the job that he was hired to do, then I'm going to be supportive of him," Dennison said.
as long as BH continues to lose to the Cats, i'm supportive of him too.

on a serious note: it is disturbing that MSU continues to be mentioned, but heck - those things did happen just recently. my personal opinion is that the Cats are headed in the right direction now, but not so sure of UM given recent events. i know i may take heat for this, but would rather see a decent program with kids graduating and doing the right thing - then one winning at all costs and have troubles. there are some damn fine kids playing for both teams and it sucks that they all get the black eye.

also, i don't believe BH will be as a hot comodity as he could have been given these events.
Especially after they lose the next two games. UM could be stuck with BH for awhile, thats fine with me.



User avatar
SonomaCat
Moderator
Posts: 24042
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Contact:

Post by SonomaCat » Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:03 pm

MSU Toddler wrote: also, i don't believe BH will be as a hot comodity as he could have been given these events.
I totally agree ... this will probably keep him in Missoula at least one more year ... similar to the effect our problems had on preventing Kramer from getting the Idaho job and bringing him back (temporarily) to Bozeman.



Eastcoastgriz
Member # Retired
Posts: 2151
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 5:43 am
Location: Use to be New Jersey

Post by Eastcoastgriz » Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:55 pm

cats2506 wrote:
Especially after they lose the next two games. UM could be stuck with BH for awhile, thats fine with me.
Great, works for me.


The GRIZ, a quarter century of total football dominance over the cats.

GrizinWashington
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7992
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:30 pm

Post by GrizinWashington » Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:37 pm

Eastcoastgriz wrote:
cats2506 wrote:
Especially after they lose the next two games. UM could be stuck with BH for awhile, thats fine with me.
Great, works for me.
Me too!!! I'll be VERY happy to retain the BSC's winniest coach and go 11-0 just about every year, and compete for NCs every other or so. Don't get to spend Thanksgiving at home, but that only seems important to cats.



User avatar
tampa_griz
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 5467
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:37 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: AP Spin Cycle on Hauck

Post by tampa_griz » Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:29 pm

crazycat wrote:They made sure they filled this story, which is supposed to be about the UM admin. supporting Hauck, will a detailed recap of all the MSU problems........

Just seems like the AP has gone out of its way to continue mentioning MSU's problems whenever UM has trouble. Just about every story by the AP on UM's Wilson this summer had some mention of the crimes at MSU.
Of all people to whine..........
crazycat wrote:This isn't a comparison just thought it'd be interesting to see the rap sheets stacked up next to each other. Here's the crime tally going back to Miller/Lebrum murder arrest:

UM (7)
Coleman - Prior legal problems. Hit with burglary, kidnapping, assault w/weapon charge while at UM.
Pate - No known priors. Hit with same as Coleman.
Shelton - Prior academic problems. Hit with same as above.
Asst. BBall coach - Prior DUI. DUI while at UM.
Quinn - Prior DUIs (2) and kicked off OU team for taking unearned money. DUI while at UM.
Freeman - Prior problems. Accomplice in murder charge and legal trouble while at UM.
Wilson - No known priors. Murder while with UM.

MSU (7)
DW? - No known priors. Drug ring after leaving MSU. Still loose?
Gatewood - No known priors. Drug ring after leaving MSU.
Fuller - No Known priors. Drug ring while at MSU.
Davis - Prior assault charge. Drug ring after leaving MSU.
Sullivan - No known priors. Drug ring after leaving MSU.
Lebrum - No known priors. Murder and drug charges after leaving MSU.
Miller (B-Ball) - No known priors. Murder and drug charges after leaving MSU.
crazycat wrote:The situations are similar, but that they are the two major universities in one state, which just happens to be our state, that makes comparisons unavoidable.

If this were USC and UCLA, Espn would have a Tale of The Tape comparing the laws broken by the players and they'd be weighing it out.
Sorry CC, but your bitching is falling on deaf ears this time.......



User avatar
Weltercat
Member # Retired
Posts: 2071
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 11:13 pm

Re: AP Spin Cycle on Hauck

Post by Weltercat » Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:31 pm

tampa_griz wrote:
crazycat wrote:They made sure they filled this story, which is supposed to be about the UM admin. supporting Hauck, will a detailed recap of all the MSU problems........

Just seems like the AP has gone out of its way to continue mentioning MSU's problems whenever UM has trouble. Just about every story by the AP on UM's Wilson this summer had some mention of the crimes at MSU.
Of all people to whine..........
crazycat wrote:This isn't a comparison just thought it'd be interesting to see the rap sheets stacked up next to each other. Here's the crime tally going back to Miller/Lebrum murder arrest:

UM (7)
Coleman - Prior legal problems. Hit with burglary, kidnapping, assault w/weapon charge while at UM.
Pate - No known priors. Hit with same as Coleman.
Shelton - Prior academic problems. Hit with same as above.
Asst. BBall coach - Prior DUI. DUI while at UM.
Quinn - Prior DUIs (2) and kicked off OU team for taking unearned money. DUI while at UM.
Freeman - Prior problems. Accomplice in murder charge and legal trouble while at UM.
Wilson - No known priors. Murder while with UM.

MSU (7)
DW? - No known priors. Drug ring after leaving MSU. Still loose?
Gatewood - No known priors. Drug ring after leaving MSU.
Fuller - No Known priors. Drug ring while at MSU.
Davis - Prior assault charge. Drug ring after leaving MSU.
Sullivan - No known priors. Drug ring after leaving MSU.
Lebrum - No known priors. Murder and drug charges after leaving MSU.
Miller (B-Ball) - No known priors. Murder and drug charges after leaving MSU.
crazycat wrote:The situations are similar, but that they are the two major universities in one state, which just happens to be our state, that makes comparisons unavoidable.

If this were USC and UCLA, Espn would have a Tale of The Tape comparing the laws broken by the players and they'd be weighing it out.
Sorry CC, but your bitching is falling on deaf ears this time.......
What is your point?


"The conservation of natural resources is the fundamental problem. Unless we solve that problem it will avail us little to solve all others." Theodore Roosevelt

User avatar
PapaG
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 9372
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:44 am
Location: The Magic City, MT

Post by PapaG » Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:41 pm

GrizinWashington wrote:
Eastcoastgriz wrote:
cats2506 wrote:
Especially after they lose the next two games. UM could be stuck with BH for awhile, thats fine with me.
Great, works for me.
Me too!!! I'll be VERY happy to retain the BSC's winniest coach and go 11-0 just about every year, and compete for NCs every other or so. Don't get to spend Thanksgiving at home, but that only seems important to cats.
Has Hauck had an undefeated season? I honestly don't remember.



User avatar
tampa_griz
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 5467
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:37 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: AP Spin Cycle on Hauck

Post by tampa_griz » Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:42 pm

Weltercat wrote:
tampa_griz wrote:
crazycat wrote:They made sure they filled this story, which is supposed to be about the UM admin. supporting Hauck, will a detailed recap of all the MSU problems........

Just seems like the AP has gone out of its way to continue mentioning MSU's problems whenever UM has trouble. Just about every story by the AP on UM's Wilson this summer had some mention of the crimes at MSU.
Of all people to whine..........
crazycat wrote:This isn't a comparison just thought it'd be interesting to see the rap sheets stacked up next to each other. Here's the crime tally going back to Miller/Lebrum murder arrest:

UM (7)
Coleman - Prior legal problems. Hit with burglary, kidnapping, assault w/weapon charge while at UM.
Pate - No known priors. Hit with same as Coleman.
Shelton - Prior academic problems. Hit with same as above.
Asst. BBall coach - Prior DUI. DUI while at UM.
Quinn - Prior DUIs (2) and kicked off OU team for taking unearned money. DUI while at UM.
Freeman - Prior problems. Accomplice in murder charge and legal trouble while at UM.
Wilson - No known priors. Murder while with UM.

MSU (7)
DW? - No known priors. Drug ring after leaving MSU. Still loose?
Gatewood - No known priors. Drug ring after leaving MSU.
Fuller - No Known priors. Drug ring while at MSU.
Davis - Prior assault charge. Drug ring after leaving MSU.
Sullivan - No known priors. Drug ring after leaving MSU.
Lebrum - No known priors. Murder and drug charges after leaving MSU.
Miller (B-Ball) - No known priors. Murder and drug charges after leaving MSU.
crazycat wrote:The situations are similar, but that they are the two major universities in one state, which just happens to be our state, that makes comparisons unavoidable.

If this were USC and UCLA, Espn would have a Tale of The Tape comparing the laws broken by the players and they'd be weighing it out.
Sorry CC, but your bitching is falling on deaf ears this time.......
What is your point?
He makes a detailed a detailed list of UM's vs. MSU's illegal transgressions (while constantly reminding us that none of MSU's were engaging in this behavior while they were on the team), tells us that it's inevitable that sports writers would make a comparison between the two.........and then complains when a news story does that.

EDIT:

Then again, maybe the news story was just an exercise in academics, and not a comparison of each teams' problems. That was his explanation for the list.



User avatar
Weltercat
Member # Retired
Posts: 2071
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 11:13 pm

Re: AP Spin Cycle on Hauck

Post by Weltercat » Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:49 pm

tampa_griz wrote:
Weltercat wrote:
tampa_griz wrote:
crazycat wrote:They made sure they filled this story, which is supposed to be about the UM admin. supporting Hauck, will a detailed recap of all the MSU problems........

Just seems like the AP has gone out of its way to continue mentioning MSU's problems whenever UM has trouble. Just about every story by the AP on UM's Wilson this summer had some mention of the crimes at MSU.
Of all people to whine..........
crazycat wrote:This isn't a comparison just thought it'd be interesting to see the rap sheets stacked up next to each other. Here's the crime tally going back to Miller/Lebrum murder arrest:

UM (7)
Coleman - Prior legal problems. Hit with burglary, kidnapping, assault w/weapon charge while at UM.
Pate - No known priors. Hit with same as Coleman.
Shelton - Prior academic problems. Hit with same as above.
Asst. BBall coach - Prior DUI. DUI while at UM.
Quinn - Prior DUIs (2) and kicked off OU team for taking unearned money. DUI while at UM.
Freeman - Prior problems. Accomplice in murder charge and legal trouble while at UM.
Wilson - No known priors. Murder while with UM.

MSU (7)
DW? - No known priors. Drug ring after leaving MSU. Still loose?
Gatewood - No known priors. Drug ring after leaving MSU.
Fuller - No Known priors. Drug ring while at MSU.
Davis - Prior assault charge. Drug ring after leaving MSU.
Sullivan - No known priors. Drug ring after leaving MSU.
Lebrum - No known priors. Murder and drug charges after leaving MSU.
Miller (B-Ball) - No known priors. Murder and drug charges after leaving MSU.
crazycat wrote:The situations are similar, but that they are the two major universities in one state, which just happens to be our state, that makes comparisons unavoidable.

If this were USC and UCLA, Espn would have a Tale of The Tape comparing the laws broken by the players and they'd be weighing it out.
Sorry CC, but your bitching is falling on deaf ears this time.......
What is your point?
He makes a detailed a detailed list of UM's vs. MSU's illegal transgressions (while constantly reminding us that none of MSU's were engaging in this behavior while they were on the team), tells us that it's inevitable that sports writers would make a comparison between the two.........and then complains when a news story does that.
Well it is Cat/Griz week and you are on BobcatNation so expect a little slant.

Like Fox news. "We report you decide".


"The conservation of natural resources is the fundamental problem. Unless we solve that problem it will avail us little to solve all others." Theodore Roosevelt

User avatar
tampa_griz
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 5467
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:37 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: AP Spin Cycle on Hauck

Post by tampa_griz » Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:15 pm

Weltercat wrote:Well it is Cat/Griz week and you are on BobcatNation so expect a little slant.

Like Fox news. "We report you decide".
I'm just trying to pull his thong back out of his throat.



crazycat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4432
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 6:03 pm

Re: AP Spin Cycle on Hauck

Post by crazycat » Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:35 pm

tampa_griz wrote:
Weltercat wrote:
tampa_griz wrote:
crazycat wrote:They made sure they filled this story, which is supposed to be about the UM admin. supporting Hauck, will a detailed recap of all the MSU problems........

Just seems like the AP has gone out of its way to continue mentioning MSU's problems whenever UM has trouble. Just about every story by the AP on UM's Wilson this summer had some mention of the crimes at MSU.
Of all people to whine..........
crazycat wrote:This isn't a comparison just thought it'd be interesting to see the rap sheets stacked up next to each other. Here's the crime tally going back to Miller/Lebrum murder arrest:

UM (7)
Coleman - Prior legal problems. Hit with burglary, kidnapping, assault w/weapon charge while at UM.
Pate - No known priors. Hit with same as Coleman.
Shelton - Prior academic problems. Hit with same as above.
Asst. BBall coach - Prior DUI. DUI while at UM.
Quinn - Prior DUIs (2) and kicked off OU team for taking unearned money. DUI while at UM.
Freeman - Prior problems. Accomplice in murder charge and legal trouble while at UM.
Wilson - No known priors. Murder while with UM.

MSU (7)
DW? - No known priors. Drug ring after leaving MSU. Still loose?
Gatewood - No known priors. Drug ring after leaving MSU.
Fuller - No Known priors. Drug ring while at MSU.
Davis - Prior assault charge. Drug ring after leaving MSU.
Sullivan - No known priors. Drug ring after leaving MSU.
Lebrum - No known priors. Murder and drug charges after leaving MSU.
Miller (B-Ball) - No known priors. Murder and drug charges after leaving MSU.
crazycat wrote:The situations are similar, but that they are the two major universities in one state, which just happens to be our state, that makes comparisons unavoidable.

If this were USC and UCLA, Espn would have a Tale of The Tape comparing the laws broken by the players and they'd be weighing it out.
Sorry CC, but your bitching is falling on deaf ears this time.......
What is your point?
He makes a detailed a detailed list of UM's vs. MSU's illegal transgressions (while constantly reminding us that none of MSU's were engaging in this behavior while they were on the team), tells us that it's inevitable that sports writers would make a comparison between the two.........and then complains when a news story does that.

EDIT:

Then again, maybe the news story was just an exercise in academics, and not a comparison of each teams' problems. That was his explanation for the list.
The AP story was supposed to be about the UM admin's support of Hauck, but somehow they worked it out so they could include MSU's problems, too. My list was just what it was...a list. It wasn't designed to make one school look better or worse than the other and it doesn't. They both look bad.

I didn't start talking about how Kramer had this problem and then slipped in UM's problems. TG: You just haven't had a taste of this yet. Hopefully for all of us you won't, but if MSU gets in more trouble and AP decides to include all of UM's misfortunes in a story they headline as being about MSU's new problem, you'll get the drift here.



User avatar
tampa_griz
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 5467
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:37 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: AP Spin Cycle on Hauck

Post by tampa_griz » Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:54 pm

crazycat wrote:The AP story was supposed to be about the UM admin's support of Hauck, but somehow they worked it out so they could include MSU's problems, too. My list was just what it was...a list. It wasn't designed to make one school look better or worse than the other and it doesn't. They both look bad.
And that's all the AP's story was........just a list. Nothing more.



crazycat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4432
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 6:03 pm

Re: AP Spin Cycle on Hauck

Post by crazycat » Thu Nov 15, 2007 10:06 pm

tampa_griz wrote:
crazycat wrote:The AP story was supposed to be about the UM admin's support of Hauck, but somehow they worked it out so they could include MSU's problems, too. My list was just what it was...a list. It wasn't designed to make one school look better or worse than the other and it doesn't. They both look bad.
And that's all the AP's story was........just a list. Nothing more.
There's an obvious disconnect here. The AP story was about how UM's admin was supporting Hauck, yet somehow it included a rundown of MSU's past problems. Why?

I simply listed all the players that were arrested, what they were arrested for, their status with their team, and their previous brushes with the law. I didn't start out talking about glazed doughnuts and then mention UM's criminal cases between telling your the measurements for flour and sugar, did I?



Grizlaw
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3305
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Floral Park, NY

Re: AP Spin Cycle on Hauck

Post by Grizlaw » Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:13 pm

crazycat wrote:There's an obvious disconnect here. The AP story was about how UM's admin was supporting Hauck, yet somehow it included a rundown of MSU's past problems. Why?
I honestly do understand why you're frustrated with this (I have actually had a similar situation in my own life, where someone I am close to got into some trouble, and even though it's old news at this point, it still gets gratuitously mentioned in the newspaper on occasion for no apparent reason). But, if you read this particular article, I actually think it would have been weird not to discuss MSU's situation.

O'Day mentioned the Kramer situation in his quote (which also made sense; he was explaining the contrast between UM's support of Hauck vs. MSU's firing of Kramer). If they were going to include that quote, it would have been weird not to explain the situation, wouldn't it? I mean, I know it's frustrating to you guys to keep reading about it, but it's not like everyone in the country who reads the AP newswire is intimately familiar with the situation at MSU.


I work as an attorney so that I can afford good scotch, which helps me to forget that I work as an attorney.

Grizlaw
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3305
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Floral Park, NY

Post by Grizlaw » Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:28 pm

PapaG wrote:Has Hauck had an undefeated season? I honestly don't remember.
I think this will be his first.


I work as an attorney so that I can afford good scotch, which helps me to forget that I work as an attorney.

crazycat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4432
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 6:03 pm

Re: AP Spin Cycle on Hauck

Post by crazycat » Fri Nov 16, 2007 7:03 am

Grizlaw,
I see what you mean, but....

First AP says:
seven Montana football players have been in trouble with the law
Pretty innocuous description. They do go into more detail near the end of the story.

Then the quote by O'Day:
"I think there's a lot of misunderstanding of the situation at Montana State. The piece that doesn't add in here is the educational piece."
This highlights APR and skims over crime.

The AP immediately follows with:
Kramer, who coached the Bobcat football team for seven seasons, was fired in May shortly after former wide receiver Ricky Gatewood was arrested on drug charges. Gatewood was the sixth current or former MSU football player arrested. Of those, one has been charged with murder along with a former MSU basketball player.
Another factor in Kramer's firing was the fact that the football team was losing scholarships for failing to meet NCAA academic standards.
To match O'Day this should've led with the second paragraph about academics, then a not so misleading second graph that matched O'Day's words. The first sentence would've been appropriate had it just ended with "...in May shortly after a sixth former player was arrested as part of a drug ring." It could've followed with something about another player that was currently on the team was also arrested in connection with these crimes. I/m 50/50 on mentioning the murder, but if this is about Kramer why throw the basketball player in there? In a nutshell it would've matched O'Day's comment without all the details.

I think it was Dennison who said in another article, "We don't go looking for transfers, they come looking for us." A good question would be, "Why? And what difference does it make in terms of who ends up at UM." Obviously its a good team, so transfers find it attractive, but are they also looking at UM, because UM has a history of taking guys with prior problmes. And does the fact that UM doesn't go looking mean they have to take guys with prior problems. His comment leads one to believe that UM is some sort of elite place, if so then why doesn't who the school selects to transfer mimic that?



crazycat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4432
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 6:03 pm

Post by crazycat » Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:14 am

I thought the AP worded this article properly.

http://missoulian.com/articles/2007/11/ ... s/br62.txt



Post Reply