GrizinWashington wrote:Bay Area Cat wrote:Citizen Griz wrote:tampa_griz wrote:Bay Area Cat wrote:So you said he sounds like an ignorant ass, and then you proceed to post details that reinforce the very point he was making....
I thought the same thing. Good to know you're all not "ignorant asses".

Hey, if someone wants to list the "number of occasions" Montana bought playoff games against higher seeded opponents, I fire up the BBQ and eat some crow. Anybody? Tampa? BAC?
Ahh, so you're pissed off by the imprecise quantity he noted, eh?
I don't think the point he was making hinged greatly on the number of times that it had happened, but rather on the fact that it had happened, and was a precedent to what we saw in the current case.
So you are calling him an ignorant ass because what he said happened was actually exactly what had happened, but had only happened once? You have a really, really, really low threshhold for invoking the "ignorant ass" criticism. That would be a "nit" in my book.
Methinks you are trying too hard to find something to disagree with a Bobcat about and taking a little too much pleasure in it.
Bobcat: It feels like it's 20 degrees outside today.
Citizen Griz: You are an ignorant ass. It is, in fact, 22 degrees outside today!
BAC, I normally agree with you, but I think you're off-base here. The quote was:
There were a number of occasions where the bid determined UM would be at home against a higher ranked opponent. Money talks and the NCAA is a gaggle of Ho's.
"...a number of occasions" certainly implies a number greater than one. I agree that doesn't change the fact that both schools secured home games with $$, but I would argue the implications that it ocurred multiple times at Montana does change the tenor of the original post.
Yes, "...a number of occasions" implies it's happened a lot. As far as I recall UM HAS NEVER HOSTED A PLAYOFF GAME AGAINST A TEAM WITH A BETTER W/L RECORD.
Yes, in 1994 Montana outbid McNeese for the quarter final game. UM was #6 McNeese was #5. Both teams had 9-2 regular season records. Hardly a tremendous injustice.
After 1994 the NCAA changed the I-AA playoff policy. From 1995-2000 every team was seed 1 to 16 and there was NO BID's for home playoff games. In those years the HIGHER SEEDED team ALWAYS HOSTED.
1995 UM (9-2) benefited from several upsets: Ga Southern beat Troy St. and played in Missoula in the quarter finals. SFA beat App St. (who was undefeated at the time.) E. Kentucky, Ga. Southern and SFA were lower seeds than UM.
1996 UM (11-0) was the #1 seed and hosted 3 games.
1997, 1998 UM had no home playoff games.
1999 UM (9-2) was #8 and hosted #9 Youngstown (9-2).
2000 UM (10-1) was the #1 seed. Which prompted Ga Southern coach Paul Johnson, the #2 seed, to claim his team "got no respect" and "nobody expects us to win this thing". UM hosted 3 games.
After 9/11/2001 the NCAA changed to the current policy of seeding the top 4 teams and opening up the other games to bids. In part this change was due to the fact that some of the playoff games in previous years had abysmal attendance. I remember several playoff games with less than 3,500 attendance.
2001 UM (11-1) was the #2 seed and Ga. Southern was #1. UM hosted 3 games against lower seeded teams.
2002 UM (10-2) hosted Northwestern St. (9-3), then played at McNeese.
2003 UM (9-3) hosted W. Illinois (9-3). I believe UM was ranked higher at the time.
2004 UM (9-2) was not seeded, but got 3 home playoff games when New Hampshire knocked off Ga. Southern and EWU upset #1 S. Illinois. Montana played NW State (8-3), New Hampshire (9-2) and Sam Houston (9-2). I think New Hampshire was ranked 5th and UM 6th at the end of the regular season. Montana was ranked ahead of Sam Houston.
2005 UM (8-3) hosted Cal Poly (8-3). I believe Montana was ranked 9th and Cal Poly 10th.
(Team win/loss records are from the end of the regular season.)