Last Dynasty

The place to talk smack with those not fortunate enough to be Bobcat fans.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

User avatar
Cat-theotherwhitemeat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3156
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 5:45 pm
Location: Billings
Contact:

Post by Cat-theotherwhitemeat » Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:19 am

Griz Dude wrote:
Grizlaw wrote:
grzh8r wrote:I had no idea the Griz were 2-10 in road playoff games. Just goes to prove there's a definite home field advantage at WaGriz....
I think the 2-10 record must include championship games, because I don't remember the Griz ever winning a road playoff game other than the two title games (and I'm pretty sure they haven't played twelve road playoff games unless you count title games, as well).

I've made this point before, though, on different boards -- I think the Griz road playoff record is a little deceptive as a measure of the homefield advantage at Wa Griz. One thing you have to remember about those road playoff losses is that a lot of them came against teams who were simply vastly superior to ours in those years (Ga. Southern in 1989, Marshall in 1996, the loss @ Youngstown State in I don't remember what year; the 1998 loss to W. Illinois), and we probably would've lost those games even if they had been in Missoula. I'm not saying there isn't a huge homefield advantage in Missoula; I'm just saying that the 2-10 road playoff record should be looked at in the proper perspective.

There's a reason why we were on the road in a lot of those games, and it's because the other team was simply better than we were and had earned homefield advantage.

And that is the same reason why Hauck's two home playoff losses stink so much. We were not only the better team, but we had the great Wash/Griz homefield advantage, which is the biggest homefield advantage in all of Div. I footballl! Yet, Bobby still finds a way to lose. Precisely why I do not like him as a coach. He sucks in big games...i.e. Cats, playoffs.
IMO, Cal Poly was simply the better team last year.



User avatar
STREETCAT
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1021
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:11 am
Location: BOZEMAN

Post by STREETCAT » Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:29 am

Cat-theotherwhitemeat wrote:
Griz Dude wrote:
Grizlaw wrote:
grzh8r wrote:I had no idea the Griz were 2-10 in road playoff games. Just goes to prove there's a definite home field advantage at WaGriz....
I think the 2-10 record must include championship games, because I don't remember the Griz ever winning a road playoff game other than the two title games (and I'm pretty sure they haven't played twelve road playoff games unless you count title games, as well).

I've made this point before, though, on different boards -- I think the Griz road playoff record is a little deceptive as a measure of the homefield advantage at Wa Griz. One thing you have to remember about those road playoff losses is that a lot of them came against teams who were simply vastly superior to ours in those years (Ga. Southern in 1989, Marshall in 1996, the loss @ Youngstown State in I don't remember what year; the 1998 loss to W. Illinois), and we probably would've lost those games even if they had been in Missoula. I'm not saying there isn't a huge homefield advantage in Missoula; I'm just saying that the 2-10 road playoff record should be looked at in the proper perspective.

There's a reason why we were on the road in a lot of those games, and it's because the other team was simply better than we were and had earned homefield advantage.

And that is the same reason why Hauck's two home playoff losses stink so much. We were not only the better team, but we had the great Wash/Griz homefield advantage, which is the biggest homefield advantage in all of Div. I footballl! Yet, Bobby still finds a way to lose. Precisely why I do not like him as a coach. He sucks in big games...i.e. Cats, playoffs.
IMO, Cal Poly was simply the better team last year.
You must have missed the game during the season then



User avatar
Cat-theotherwhitemeat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3156
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 5:45 pm
Location: Billings
Contact:

Post by Cat-theotherwhitemeat » Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:32 am

Streetcat, are you saying the better team always wins every game? I was at that game. The Griz won, but Cal Poly was clearly better. I knew going into that playoff game that the Griz were the underdog.



User avatar
CARDIAC_CATS
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7857
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:37 am

Post by CARDIAC_CATS » Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:50 pm

Grizlaw wrote:
grzh8r wrote:I had no idea the Griz were 2-10 in road playoff games. Just goes to prove there's a definite home field advantage at WaGriz....
I think the 2-10 record must include championship games, because I don't remember the Griz ever winning a road playoff game other than the two title games (and I'm pretty sure they haven't played twelve road playoff games unless you count title games, as well).

I've made this point before, though, on different boards -- I think the Griz road playoff record is a little deceptive as a measure of the homefield advantage at Wa Griz. One thing you have to remember about those road playoff losses is that a lot of them came against teams who were simply vastly superior to ours in those years (Ga. Southern in 1989, Marshall in 1996, the loss @ Youngstown State in I don't remember what year; the 1998 loss to W. Illinois), and we probably would've lost those games even if they had been in Missoula. I'm not saying there isn't a huge homefield advantage in Missoula; I'm just saying that the 2-10 road playoff record should be looked at in the proper perspective.

There's a reason why we were on the road in a lot of those games, and it's because the other team was simply better than we were and had earned homefield advantage.
Or they outbid the Griz? Playoffs remember ... not payoffs :)



User avatar
CARDIAC_CATS
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7857
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:37 am

Post by CARDIAC_CATS » Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:53 pm

Cat-theotherwhitemeat wrote:
Griz Dude wrote:
Grizlaw wrote:
grzh8r wrote:I had no idea the Griz were 2-10 in road playoff games. Just goes to prove there's a definite home field advantage at WaGriz....
I think the 2-10 record must include championship games, because I don't remember the Griz ever winning a road playoff game other than the two title games (and I'm pretty sure they haven't played twelve road playoff games unless you count title games, as well).

I've made this point before, though, on different boards -- I think the Griz road playoff record is a little deceptive as a measure of the homefield advantage at Wa Griz. One thing you have to remember about those road playoff losses is that a lot of them came against teams who were simply vastly superior to ours in those years (Ga. Southern in 1989, Marshall in 1996, the loss @ Youngstown State in I don't remember what year; the 1998 loss to W. Illinois), and we probably would've lost those games even if they had been in Missoula. I'm not saying there isn't a huge homefield advantage in Missoula; I'm just saying that the 2-10 road playoff record should be looked at in the proper perspective.

There's a reason why we were on the road in a lot of those games, and it's because the other team was simply better than we were and had earned homefield advantage.

And that is the same reason why Hauck's two home playoff losses stink so much. We were not only the better team, but we had the great Wash/Griz homefield advantage, which is the biggest homefield advantage in all of Div. I footballl! Yet, Bobby still finds a way to lose. Precisely why I do not like him as a coach. He sucks in big games...i.e. Cats, playoffs.
IMO, Cal Poly was simply the better team last year.
Overall Cal Poly was clearly the better team on both sides of the ball last year. Their D was ROCK solid.



Griz Dude
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 5:30 pm

Post by Griz Dude » Fri Oct 27, 2006 4:40 pm

CARDIAC_CATS wrote:
Cat-theotherwhitemeat wrote:
Griz Dude wrote:
Grizlaw wrote:
grzh8r wrote:I had no idea the Griz were 2-10 in road playoff games. Just goes to prove there's a definite home field advantage at WaGriz....
I think the 2-10 record must include championship games, because I don't remember the Griz ever winning a road playoff game other than the two title games (and I'm pretty sure they haven't played twelve road playoff games unless you count title games, as well).

I've made this point before, though, on different boards -- I think the Griz road playoff record is a little deceptive as a measure of the homefield advantage at Wa Griz. One thing you have to remember about those road playoff losses is that a lot of them came against teams who were simply vastly superior to ours in those years (Ga. Southern in 1989, Marshall in 1996, the loss @ Youngstown State in I don't remember what year; the 1998 loss to W. Illinois), and we probably would've lost those games even if they had been in Missoula. I'm not saying there isn't a huge homefield advantage in Missoula; I'm just saying that the 2-10 road playoff record should be looked at in the proper perspective.

There's a reason why we were on the road in a lot of those games, and it's because the other team was simply better than we were and had earned homefield advantage.

And that is the same reason why Hauck's two home playoff losses stink so much. We were not only the better team, but we had the great Wash/Griz homefield advantage, which is the biggest homefield advantage in all of Div. I footballl! Yet, Bobby still finds a way to lose. Precisely why I do not like him as a coach. He sucks in big games...i.e. Cats, playoffs.
IMO, Cal Poly was simply the better team last year.
Overall Cal Poly was clearly the better team on both sides of the ball last year. Their D was ROCK solid.
I don't buy it for a minute. They just had better coaching than Hauck/staff. They learned how to make adjustments in their first meeting with us, and made them them when they played us again. Remember, Hammerschmidt of Cal Poly was our D-coordinator the year before. He knows how to defend Phen-Phen ball. Our coaches could not impliment the strategy to counteract what they were doing. I was at both games. We had much better overall talent than Poly.

I suppose you are going to tell me that the reason the Bobcats embarrassed the Griz last year was because of their superior talent also. Give me a break. Kramer outcoaches Hauck every year. It will be no different this year.



User avatar
DriftCat
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1559
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Billings, MT

Post by DriftCat » Fri Oct 27, 2006 4:57 pm

Griz Dude wrote:
CARDIAC_CATS wrote:
Cat-theotherwhitemeat wrote:
Griz Dude wrote:
Grizlaw wrote:
grzh8r wrote:I had no idea the Griz were 2-10 in road playoff games. Just goes to prove there's a definite home field advantage at WaGriz....
I think the 2-10 record must include championship games, because I don't remember the Griz ever winning a road playoff game other than the two title games (and I'm pretty sure they haven't played twelve road playoff games unless you count title games, as well).

I've made this point before, though, on different boards -- I think the Griz road playoff record is a little deceptive as a measure of the homefield advantage at Wa Griz. One thing you have to remember about those road playoff losses is that a lot of them came against teams who were simply vastly superior to ours in those years (Ga. Southern in 1989, Marshall in 1996, the loss @ Youngstown State in I don't remember what year; the 1998 loss to W. Illinois), and we probably would've lost those games even if they had been in Missoula. I'm not saying there isn't a huge homefield advantage in Missoula; I'm just saying that the 2-10 road playoff record should be looked at in the proper perspective.

There's a reason why we were on the road in a lot of those games, and it's because the other team was simply better than we were and had earned homefield advantage.

And that is the same reason why Hauck's two home playoff losses stink so much. We were not only the better team, but we had the great Wash/Griz homefield advantage, which is the biggest homefield advantage in all of Div. I footballl! Yet, Bobby still finds a way to lose. Precisely why I do not like him as a coach. He sucks in big games...i.e. Cats, playoffs.
IMO, Cal Poly was simply the better team last year.
Overall Cal Poly was clearly the better team on both sides of the ball last year. Their D was ROCK solid.
I don't buy it for a minute. They just had better coaching than Hauck/staff. They learned how to make adjustments in their first meeting with us, and made them them when they played us again. Remember, Hammerschmidt of Cal Poly was our D-coordinator the year before. He knows how to defend Phen-Phen ball. Our coaches could not impliment the strategy to counteract what they were doing. I was at both games. We had much better overall talent than Poly.

I suppose you are going to tell me that the reason the Bobcats embarrassed the Griz last year was because of their superior talent also. Give me a break. Kramer outcoaches Hauck every year. It will be no different this year.
Yes. We were more talented than the Griz last year. It's the same this year only more so.



User avatar
Catfan2030
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 263
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 10:49 am
Location: Big Sky Country

Post by Catfan2030 » Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:55 pm

Cat-theotherwhitemeat wrote:As some of you might know, I've been a proponent of the Grizzlies makinga move to I-A, more specifically to the WAC. This articles reaffirms my desire and I'll tell you why. I miss watching the Griz play Idaho, Boise State, and Nevada. The fact that they are no longer in the Big Sky is a huge reason why the Grizzlies have had so much success.

So basically, the conference takes a dive in quality and UM takes advantage. Sure, it looks great and all, but what would this article look like if they had stayed. Would it even be about the Griz, or the Broncos. I wish the Griz were I-A, for no other reason that we would play with the old gang again.

Both MSU and UM could compete right away in the WAC. Every time I watch a game on TV I can't help but think....In the WAC, we would have better competition, better TV coverage (more games on ESPN2 and such), and better refs.

I know this will never happen no matter how much we talk about it but I still mouth off.
I have a feeling this type of thing will happen sometime in the future because UM cant possibly stay with the BSC forever with the success they have......and even at MSU we are making some big things happen which could mean a move in maybe 10 years at the rate they are both going. Not trying to start another "should we move to 1A thing" but i think its more of a question of when than if. I mean these plans to change all of the facilities at UM and MSU is rediculous. Its hard to think that they are making all these adjustments for no reason. Plus im with you, it would be sweet to be watching the old games with teams like Boise State and Nevada!



Swilly3224
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1265
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:09 pm
Location: You know the school
Contact:

Post by Swilly3224 » Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:31 pm

MM7CAT wrote:
Griz Dude wrote:
CARDIAC_CATS wrote:
Cat-theotherwhitemeat wrote:
Griz Dude wrote:
Grizlaw wrote:
grzh8r wrote:I had no idea the Griz were 2-10 in road playoff games. Just goes to prove there's a definite home field advantage at WaGriz....
I think the 2-10 record must include championship games, because I don't remember the Griz ever winning a road playoff game other than the two title games (and I'm pretty sure they haven't played twelve road playoff games unless you count title games, as well).

I've made this point before, though, on different boards -- I think the Griz road playoff record is a little deceptive as a measure of the homefield advantage at Wa Griz. One thing you have to remember about those road playoff losses is that a lot of them came against teams who were simply vastly superior to ours in those years (Ga. Southern in 1989, Marshall in 1996, the loss @ Youngstown State in I don't remember what year; the 1998 loss to W. Illinois), and we probably would've lost those games even if they had been in Missoula. I'm not saying there isn't a huge homefield advantage in Missoula; I'm just saying that the 2-10 road playoff record should be looked at in the proper perspective.

There's a reason why we were on the road in a lot of those games, and it's because the other team was simply better than we were and had earned homefield advantage.

And that is the same reason why Hauck's two home playoff losses stink so much. We were not only the better team, but we had the great Wash/Griz homefield advantage, which is the biggest homefield advantage in all of Div. I footballl! Yet, Bobby still finds a way to lose. Precisely why I do not like him as a coach. He sucks in big games...i.e. Cats, playoffs.
IMO, Cal Poly was simply the better team last year.
Overall Cal Poly was clearly the better team on both sides of the ball last year. Their D was ROCK solid.
I don't buy it for a minute. They just had better coaching than Hauck/staff. They learned how to make adjustments in their first meeting with us, and made them them when they played us again. Remember, Hammerschmidt of Cal Poly was our D-coordinator the year before. He knows how to defend Phen-Phen ball. Our coaches could not impliment the strategy to counteract what they were doing. I was at both games. We had much better overall talent than Poly.

I suppose you are going to tell me that the reason the Bobcats embarrassed the Griz last year was because of their superior talent also. Give me a break. Kramer outcoaches Hauck every year. It will be no different this year.
Yes. We were more talented than the Griz last year. It's the same this year only more so.
Are you serious?



User avatar
JahGriz
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 683
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:28 am
Contact:

Post by JahGriz » Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:59 pm

I'd say the cats were more talented than the Griz last year. But not this year.


Image
Image

GrizinWashington
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7992
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:30 pm

Post by GrizinWashington » Sat Oct 28, 2006 4:43 pm

Yes. We were more talented than the Griz last year. It's the same this year only more so.
Well, if nothing else, the posts on this site keep me laughing.



User avatar
Cledus
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 5601
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:18 pm
Location: Billings Heights

Post by Cledus » Sat Oct 28, 2006 8:12 pm

I think there's no question about the Cats' talent. There's been a ton of it the last few years. As far as there being more in Bozeman than Missoula, I don't know. It's close. The difference is coaching.

Kramer and company are complete retards prior to Cat-Griz and then by the grace of God are able to put their buffoonery aside for a day. It's probably the universe's way of restoring equilibrium after a season of embarassing blunders.


UM is the university equivalent of Axe Body Spray and essential oils.

bobcatgrad2005
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 383
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 1:18 pm

Post by bobcatgrad2005 » Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:33 am

Cledua wrote:
Kramer and company are complete retards prior to Cat-Griz and then by the grace of God are able to put their buffoonery aside for a day. It's probably the universe's way of restoring equilibrium after a season of embarrassing blunders.
Ok man, I'm seriously not trying to pick a fight. But what about Kramer pisses you off so much? And did Durham, or does Huse, or the track coach similarly make you so angry? Were you cut by Kramer? I can not figure out why you have ABSOLUTLEY nothing positive to say about a man who has:

1. Put together the first 5 winning seasons in a row in school history.
2. Produced exciting teams to watch to the point of resuscitating the game day atmosphere to the south of Kagy Boulevard.
3. Beat the Grizzlies more times in the past 5 years than anyone in the last 20.
4. Put over 80,000 miles (that's the past 2 years alone) on a vehicle traveling the state promoting Bobcat Athletics and Montana State University. (Something which, by the way, was not demanded of previous coaches, and thus was not in the job description).


I know there are others. And while I respect your right to voice your opinion, I am trying to understand why it is so strong in one direction.



User avatar
Cledus
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 5601
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:18 pm
Location: Billings Heights

Post by Cledus » Sun Oct 29, 2006 9:51 am

I know there are others. And while I respect your right to voice your opinion, I am trying to understand why it is so strong in one direction.
Since this thread is related to Griz smack, I'll address your question in a more appropriate thread. Fair enough?


UM is the university equivalent of Axe Body Spray and essential oils.

Htowngriz
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 729
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:48 pm
Location: Queen City

Post by Htowngriz » Tue Oct 31, 2006 11:27 pm

kmax wrote:You know, I read that earlier today GrizinWash and was trying to figure out how I could post it here without the place blowing up too. All in all a pretty good article and really it is true, the schools that have been "dynasties" in I-AA have all fallen off to some degree but the Griz really haven't.

Finally, a cat fan who can face reality







Yet. ;)



User avatar
MSU Toddler
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1922
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:19 am
Location: Helena, MT

Post by MSU Toddler » Wed Nov 01, 2006 9:39 am

I suppose you are going to tell me that the reason the Bobcats embarrassed the Griz last year was because of their superior talent also. Give me a break. Kramer outcoaches Hauck every year. It will be no different this year.
in watching that game last year (live), the griz really didn't show a whole lot of anything (coaching, talent, playmaking, etc) - no smack intended, but they were beat on every aspect of the game. perhaps the griz had more talented players (not a qb that's for sure), but they brought absolutely nothing with them to bozeman last year. i find it funny to make a conclusion that the griz were more talented based on that game?


Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Post Reply