Egg Salad wrote:Since it was an AP article, you can read it countless other places. Instead of being upset with the Gazette, I would do that.
I'm a little confused by your post, so I will answer in a couple of ways.
1) Are you saying that it was messed up in other papers??
Show me where else the headline was messed up.
For example, here is the same AP story from the Chronicle - Headline reads: "Montana St. 24, Weber St. 18"
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/F/ ... 8-21-57-38
It is a Gazette headline. They have editors that put those headlines on there - which is why you can read AP articles in many papers with different headlines.
Even if, as you may be suggesting, it is the AP's mess up - shouldn't the Gazette (and any other paper that prints it) proof read it? After all, it is the Gazette's credibility on the line when they publish it.
or 2) Are you saying that I should stop reading the Gazette and instead get my news elsewhere?
That makes a little more sense. Unfortunately, in my line of work I need to be informed on what people across Montana are reading. Thus, I need to read many different papers in order to see what the reader is seeing.
I have been on the wrong end of the news media messing up, and then they printed their "correction" on page three of the second section. I am not on a one-man crusade, but I will take every opportunity I can to point out mistakes that they make. The news media can, and does ruin lives. Sometimes intentional, most of the time inadvertant. But for the majority of the population, there is not much that we can do about it if we find ourselves on the wrong side of a media "mistake".
In the big scheme of things, this is a very minor mistake. But letting the little mistakes slide makes the big mistakes possible....and subsequently believable.
If I have mischaracterized your post, I apologize - and I will print a correction on page three, subsection 5, at the bottom of the page (just kidding Egg Salad

)