Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
-
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3821
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:58 pm
Re: Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
So what does this mean for the kids that transfered from here to play for sprinkle? The ones that he brought here as transfers.
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9825
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 5:21 pm
Re: Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
Darius Brown is a graduate transfer and Great Osobor is a first-time transfer, so they're fine. Reportedly RaeQuan Battle did not graduate, so will be relying on the waiver process to be eligible this year.
-
- BobcatNation Redshirt
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2023 8:06 am
-
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3777
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2021 6:58 am
Re: Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
Vidlak committed on January 8. Rule change was voted on and I assume changed on the 11th or 12. Alexander committed on January 13, I believe. So basically if he was a day or two earlier, he would’ve been fine.Bobcat4Ever wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 1:50 amMr. @TomCat88, could you and @Colter_Nuanez put your collective skills together and produce a nice piece of investigative journalism as to why Vidlak plays and Alexander Jr. sits? There must be an interesting story hidden from view there. Thank you, gentlemen.
Common sense from the NCAA would have been that if a player entered the portal prior to the rule change they’d be eligible, but this is the NCAA we’re talking about here. Common sense doesn’t exist.
-
- BobcatNation Team Captain
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:44 am
Re: Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
too bad that ncaa did not immediately notify every player in the portal and every school that signed a player in the portal that there would be no grandfathering if the rule change passed. hope there are plenty of lawsuits.BelligerentBobcat wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 6:29 amVidlak committed on January 8. Rule change was voted on and I assume changed on the 11th or 12. Alexander committed on January 13, I believe. So basically if he was a day or two earlier, he would’ve been fine.Bobcat4Ever wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 1:50 amMr. @TomCat88, could you and @Colter_Nuanez put your collective skills together and produce a nice piece of investigative journalism as to why Vidlak plays and Alexander Jr. sits? There must be an interesting story hidden from view there. Thank you, gentlemen.
Common sense from the NCAA would have been that if a player entered the portal prior to the rule change they’d be eligible, but this is the NCAA we’re talking about here. Common sense doesn’t exist.
-
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3777
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2021 6:58 am
Re: Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
What good would it do? Nothing would get changed in time to make a difference.justafan wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:48 amtoo bad that ncaa did not immediately notify every player in the portal and every school that signed a player in the portal that there would be no grandfathering if the rule change passed. hope there are plenty of lawsuits.BelligerentBobcat wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 6:29 amVidlak committed on January 8. Rule change was voted on and I assume changed on the 11th or 12. Alexander committed on January 13, I believe. So basically if he was a day or two earlier, he would’ve been fine.Bobcat4Ever wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 1:50 amMr. @TomCat88, could you and @Colter_Nuanez put your collective skills together and produce a nice piece of investigative journalism as to why Vidlak plays and Alexander Jr. sits? There must be an interesting story hidden from view there. Thank you, gentlemen.
Common sense from the NCAA would have been that if a player entered the portal prior to the rule change they’d be eligible, but this is the NCAA we’re talking about here. Common sense doesn’t exist.
-
- BobcatNation Team Captain
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:44 am
Re: Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
if for no other reason than a punitive measure...ncaa is allow to screw people over time and time again.BelligerentBobcat wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:22 amWhat good would it do? Nothing would get changed in time to make a difference.justafan wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:48 amtoo bad that ncaa did not immediately notify every player in the portal and every school that signed a player in the portal that there would be no grandfathering if the rule change passed. hope there are plenty of lawsuits.BelligerentBobcat wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 6:29 amVidlak committed on January 8. Rule change was voted on and I assume changed on the 11th or 12. Alexander committed on January 13, I believe. So basically if he was a day or two earlier, he would’ve been fine.Bobcat4Ever wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 1:50 amMr. @TomCat88, could you and @Colter_Nuanez put your collective skills together and produce a nice piece of investigative journalism as to why Vidlak plays and Alexander Jr. sits? There must be an interesting story hidden from view there. Thank you, gentlemen.
Common sense from the NCAA would have been that if a player entered the portal prior to the rule change they’d be eligible, but this is the NCAA we’re talking about here. Common sense doesn’t exist.
- allcat
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8881
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:13 pm
- Location: 90 miles from Nirvana (Bobcat Stadium)
Re: Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
Michigan coach breaks the rules, 4 game suspension. A player breaks a rule that is invented later, he loses a season.justafan wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 12:26 pmif for no other reason than a punitive measure...ncaa is allow to screw people over time and time again.BelligerentBobcat wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:22 amWhat good would it do? Nothing would get changed in time to make a difference.justafan wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:48 amtoo bad that ncaa did not immediately notify every player in the portal and every school that signed a player in the portal that there would be no grandfathering if the rule change passed. hope there are plenty of lawsuits.BelligerentBobcat wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 6:29 amVidlak committed on January 8. Rule change was voted on and I assume changed on the 11th or 12. Alexander committed on January 13, I believe. So basically if he was a day or two earlier, he would’ve been fine.Bobcat4Ever wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 1:50 amMr. @TomCat88, could you and @Colter_Nuanez put your collective skills together and produce a nice piece of investigative journalism as to why Vidlak plays and Alexander Jr. sits? There must be an interesting story hidden from view there. Thank you, gentlemen.
Common sense from the NCAA would have been that if a player entered the portal prior to the rule change they’d be eligible, but this is the NCAA we’re talking about here. Common sense doesn’t exist.
Geezer. Part Bionic,. Part Iconic
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 10311
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 4:55 pm
- Location: Big Sky Country
- Contact:
Re: Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
I think it's as simple as Vidlak finished both semesters at both schools and Alexander did not. But I'll ask more deeply on that.Bobcat4Ever wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 1:50 amMr. @TomCat88, could you and @Colter_Nuanez put your collective skills together and produce a nice piece of investigative journalism as to why Vidlak plays and Alexander Jr. sits? There must be an interesting story hidden from view there. Thank you, gentlemen.
TWITTER:@Skylinesportsmt
FACEBOOK
https://www.facebook.com/skylinesportsmt1
BIG SKY BREAKDOWN ON ITUNES
https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/big ... 1131856462
SUBSCRIBE TO SKYLINE
https://skylinesportsmt.com/subscriptions/
https://www.facebook.com/skylinesportsmt1
BIG SKY BREAKDOWN ON ITUNES
https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/big ... 1131856462
SUBSCRIBE TO SKYLINE
https://skylinesportsmt.com/subscriptions/
-
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3777
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2021 6:58 am
Re: Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
He didn’t break any rules.allcat wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 7:12 amMichigan coach breaks the rules, 4 game suspension. A player breaks a rule that is invented later, he loses a season.justafan wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 12:26 pmif for no other reason than a punitive measure...ncaa is allow to screw people over time and time again.BelligerentBobcat wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:22 amWhat good would it do? Nothing would get changed in time to make a difference.justafan wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 7:48 amtoo bad that ncaa did not immediately notify every player in the portal and every school that signed a player in the portal that there would be no grandfathering if the rule change passed. hope there are plenty of lawsuits.BelligerentBobcat wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 6:29 amVidlak committed on January 8. Rule change was voted on and I assume changed on the 11th or 12. Alexander committed on January 13, I believe. So basically if he was a day or two earlier, he would’ve been fine.Bobcat4Ever wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 1:50 amMr. @TomCat88, could you and @Colter_Nuanez put your collective skills together and produce a nice piece of investigative journalism as to why Vidlak plays and Alexander Jr. sits? There must be an interesting story hidden from view there. Thank you, gentlemen.
Common sense from the NCAA would have been that if a player entered the portal prior to the rule change they’d be eligible, but this is the NCAA we’re talking about here. Common sense doesn’t exist.
-
- BobcatNation Redshirt
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:06 pm
Re: Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
Does anyone know if he gets to practice with the team? I am sure it would just be scout team, but that would be better than having a year of watching and working out on your own.
-
- BobcatNation Redshirt
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2023 1:50 pm
-
- BobcatNation Redshirt
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2023 1:50 pm
-
- Member # Retired
- Posts: 2995
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:49 pm
- Location: Cody, WY
Re: Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
Tez Walker at UNC has now been granted a year of eligibility and can play immediately. What the heck is even going on?!?
Hating the griz since 02.
- BleedingBLue
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7060
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 1:00 pm
Re: Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
Raise a big enough stink and have the school threaten a lawsuit. Then the NCAA will "find" some evidence not previously reported to allow the transfer.
- catatac
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9686
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:37 pm
Re: Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
Yep, that’s why I’ve posted this about three or four times, but he should send a letter (on a lawfirm’s letterhead), asking why others in similar situations are able to play this year, and earn $$, and he’s not. It isn’t fair, and the NCAA needs to be held accountable. I know some really good attorneys that could take this on, and prove how they are costing him potentially huge opportunities, and therefore huge money.BleedingBLue wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 11:57 amRaise a big enough stink and have the school threaten a lawsuit. Then the NCAA will "find" some evidence not previously reported to allow the transfer.
Great time to be a BOBCAT!
-
- Member # Retired
- Posts: 2143
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:18 am
Re: Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
Maybe he could get some NIL money from a law firm that represents him?catatac wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 5:55 pmYep, that’s why I’ve posted this about three or four times, but he should send a letter (on a lawfirm’s letterhead), asking why others in similar situations are able to play this year, and earn $$, and he’s not. It isn’t fair, and the NCAA needs to be held accountable. I know some really good attorneys that could take this on, and prove how they are costing him potentially huge opportunities, and therefore huge money.BleedingBLue wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 11:57 amRaise a big enough stink and have the school threaten a lawsuit. Then the NCAA will "find" some evidence not previously reported to allow the transfer.
- AFCAT
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 13018
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:25 pm
Re: Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
Give them his name!catatac wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 5:55 pmYep, that’s why I’ve posted this about three or four times, but he should send a letter (on a lawfirm’s letterhead), asking why others in similar situations are able to play this year, and earn $$, and he’s not. It isn’t fair, and the NCAA needs to be held accountable. I know some really good attorneys that could take this on, and prove how they are costing him potentially huge opportunities, and therefore huge money.BleedingBLue wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 11:57 amRaise a big enough stink and have the school threaten a lawsuit. Then the NCAA will "find" some evidence not previously reported to allow the transfer.
QB Club https://www.msubqc.org
Bobcat Collective https://bobcatcollective.com/
Bobcat athletics is a business to the coaches, school leadership, and players. It's time the fans treat Bobcat athletics as a business too.
Bobcat Collective https://bobcatcollective.com/
Bobcat athletics is a business to the coaches, school leadership, and players. It's time the fans treat Bobcat athletics as a business too.
- snarf
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 9:17 am
Re: Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
Just trying to clarify your statement: Why wouldn’t he be able to make $$? He is still fully able to engage in any NIL activity he wants. The whole point of NIL is that a player is free to market themselves apart from the university. Also, he should still be getting whatever scholarship/aid he was on.catatac wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 5:55 pmYep, that’s why I’ve posted this about three or four times, but he should send a letter (on a lawfirm’s letterhead), asking why others in similar situations are able to play this year, and earn $$, and he’s not. It isn’t fair, and the NCAA needs to be held accountable. I know some really good attorneys that could take this on, and prove how they are costing him potentially huge opportunities, and therefore huge money.BleedingBLue wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 11:57 amRaise a big enough stink and have the school threaten a lawsuit. Then the NCAA will "find" some evidence not previously reported to allow the transfer.
-
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3115
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:34 am
Re: Lonyatta Alexander Jr.
No name, recognition without playing time!snarf wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 6:40 pmJust trying to clarify your statement: Why wouldn’t he be able to make $$? He is still fully able to engage in any NIL activity he wants. The whole point of NIL is that a player is free to market themselves apart from the university. Also, he should still be getting whatever scholarship/aid he was on.catatac wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 5:55 pmYep, that’s why I’ve posted this about three or four times, but he should send a letter (on a lawfirm’s letterhead), asking why others in similar situations are able to play this year, and earn $$, and he’s not. It isn’t fair, and the NCAA needs to be held accountable. I know some really good attorneys that could take this on, and prove how they are costing him potentially huge opportunities, and therefore huge money.BleedingBLue wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2023 11:57 amRaise a big enough stink and have the school threaten a lawsuit. Then the NCAA will "find" some evidence not previously reported to allow the transfer.