Sac st president v the um Pandas....
Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
- PapaG
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9132
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:44 am
- Location: The Magic City, MT
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....
Not sure if Sac State has a set passing offense. Run game was working.
			
			
									
									Seattle to Billings to Missoula to Bozeman to Portland to Billings
What a ride
						What a ride
- PapaG
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9132
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:44 am
- Location: The Magic City, MT
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....
They’re just some stringy dudes running around on offense.
			
			
									
									Seattle to Billings to Missoula to Bozeman to Portland to Billings
What a ride
						What a ride
- 
				OldGriz
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2023 2:22 pm
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....
Sac State hung 49 points on Mercyhurst (compared to 17 for the Cats) and came into this game with a winning record.
			
			
									
									- 
				Cataholic
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7477
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2014 10:09 pm
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....
Sac State managed to score a total of 3 points against South Dakota State. They scored 35 against you tonight, and arguably should have had close to 50.
- 
				kwcat
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3300
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:34 am
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....
Whatever sucks State sucks. I’m surprised Missoula let them within three scores. They are a subpar. Bottom league Big Sky school.
I don’t pull from Missoula often, but they should’ve beat them worse than they did.
			
			
									
									I don’t pull from Missoula often, but they should’ve beat them worse than they did.
- 
				tetoncat
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:14 pm
- Location: Montana
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....
Awesome Cats gave up zero, rotated players after first series, especially on oline and RB, ran vanilla game plan and were never in danger of losing. Did you watch the game?. Cats used it to improve and get players experience, looks like Sac used it to make themselves feel dominate.
Sports is not bigger than life
						- 
				nanacat
- Member # Retired
- Posts: 2396
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 2:14 pm
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....
You gotta come up with some new material old man. Seriously.
- ClowderUp
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2024 12:29 pm
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....
Everyone. PlayerRep is a basic troll. Unoriginal and purposely ignorant just to elicit responses. No idea why he's here. He's hated day in and day out on the other site, and that should be plenty for him. But here we are.
			
			
									
									- Hawks86
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 10784
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:27 pm
- Location: MT
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....
“The guy’s kind of a clown, right?”
			
			
									
									"I'm a Bobcat forever its in my soul..."
						- RickRund
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8316
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:08 pm
- Location: Post Falls ID
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....
The gris look like they can score but their “d” does not look like they are able to keep a mediocre offense from putting up points. What happens when they go against a hot offense?
They have given up 103 to Sac, Idaho and Idaho St. By my math that is 34 per game. We only gave up 14 to ISU.
On Massey, the Gris stayed put at #5, Sagarin has them at #93. Be interesting to see if there is any movement after the weekend. Also on Massey, Sac dropped 3 spots.
			
			
									
									They have given up 103 to Sac, Idaho and Idaho St. By my math that is 34 per game. We only gave up 14 to ISU.
On Massey, the Gris stayed put at #5, Sagarin has them at #93. Be interesting to see if there is any movement after the weekend. Also on Massey, Sac dropped 3 spots.
msubobcats@outlook.com
Audiatur et altura pars: Let both sides be fairly heard.
Audi alteram partem: listen to the other side.
						Audiatur et altura pars: Let both sides be fairly heard.
Audi alteram partem: listen to the other side.
- 
				Cataholic
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7477
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2014 10:09 pm
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....
Let him troll. It just makes him look like a moron. And even more poetic with PlayerRep is that he is not anonymous as everyone knows who he is real life. What an idiot.
- 
				OldGriz
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2023 2:22 pm
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....
What’d I say wrong?
- Hawks86
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 10784
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:27 pm
- Location: MT
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....
There is a little-known codicil in the Bobcat Nation constitution that gives the mods unlimited power to preserve order of the board by ridding posters for the simple reason of being extremely annoying.
			
			
									
									"I'm a Bobcat forever its in my soul..."
						- 
				Cataholic
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7477
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2014 10:09 pm
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....
Your FTC comments are just moronic. The Mercyhurst comment is dumb. The political comments are not welcome. If you think your schtick is cute, it really isn’t. You look dumb. And trolling a rival’s fan board is quite frankly not what one would expect from a “high powered” attorney. I could prepare a resume’ of your best stuff for you show to your clients. I would say that your self perceived level of sophistication would be looked at as childish and strange behavior.
- 
				OldGriz
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2023 2:22 pm
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas...”
In order:Cataholic wrote: ↑Sat Oct 25, 2025 2:32 pmYour FTC comments are just moronic. The Mercyhurst comment is dumb. The political comments are not welcome. If you think your schtick is cute, it really isn’t. You look dumb. And trolling a rival’s fan board is quite frankly not what one would expect from a “high powered” attorney. I could prepare a resume’ of your best stuff for you show to your clients. I would say that your self perceived level of sophistication would be looked at as childish and strange behavior.
There’s never been a Griz home game where any “FTC” chant was “ringing out loud” except for Cat-Griz games, but there’s no way you could know that. Sac State did tag Mercyhurst for 49 points — why not just acknowledge it? I did not initiate any political talk, but two Cat fans did, and all I did was agree with them. I am not an attorney. You are sensitive.
- Bobcat4Ever
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:26 pm
- Location: Bozeman --> Nevada
- 
				Cataholic
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7477
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2014 10:09 pm
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas...”
You denying that you are PlayerRep?OldGriz wrote: ↑Sat Oct 25, 2025 4:10 pmIn order:Cataholic wrote: ↑Sat Oct 25, 2025 2:32 pmYour FTC comments are just moronic. The Mercyhurst comment is dumb. The political comments are not welcome. If you think your schtick is cute, it really isn’t. You look dumb. And trolling a rival’s fan board is quite frankly not what one would expect from a “high powered” attorney. I could prepare a resume’ of your best stuff for you show to your clients. I would say that your self perceived level of sophistication would be looked at as childish and strange behavior.
There’s never been a Griz home game where any “FTC” chant was “ringing out loud” except for Cat-Griz games, but there’s no way you could know that. Sac State did tag Mercyhurst for 49 points — why not just acknowledge it? I did not initiate any political talk, but two Cat fans did, and all I did was agree with them. I am not an attorney. You are sensitive.
Your FTC position is idiotic. But I am sure you have eyes all over the stadium. The lady specific told me that the Cat-Gris game was the next weekend and the fans started to cheer FTC. I am guessing at the end of the Weber game. Not so hard to visualize.
And yep, Sac State scored 49 on Mercyhurst. Sac State also only managed 3 against South Dakota State. Cats scored 24 against SDSU. Can you acknowledge that?
Lastly, after Colter said the president of the university shouldn’t act like a child, YOU RESPONDED THAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE US SHOULDN’T EITHER. You inserted politics into the discussion. Can you acknowledge that?
Once again, you are doing a great job representing the smallest D1 school in the state. Maybe you guys can show growth in enrollment by including high school seniors in dual credit classes. Oh wait, you are already doing that!

- 
				hokeyfine
- 2nd Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:18 am
- 
				MSUBobcat04
- BobcatNation Redshirt
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2021 12:24 pm
- Location: Billings, MT
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....
You called Ball Sac a "solid team"Catsrgrood wrote: ↑Wed Oct 22, 2025 3:51 pmThe griz won’t fall out of the top 10 with their first loss being to a solid team on the road. My guess would be somewhere in the 7,8,9 range.MSUBobcat04 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 22, 2025 2:42 pmFor seeding implications, you should want the Griz to win until the Brawl. If they lose to Nut Sac State, they likely fall outside of the top 10, with not much chance to climb, playing the dregs of the Big Sky (BBQ, EWWWW, and Portland St). It's better for the Bobcats to end the season with 2 top 8 (or higher) victories.Catsrgrood wrote: ↑Sun Oct 19, 2025 8:57 amThat would be a horrible interview for anyone involved with the school/football program. But to come from the president of the university?! Woof….
For the seeding implications and general FTG sentiment I have, I’d be happy to see the griz lose.
For the FSS sentiment I’ve quickly gained and to see this guy eat his words once again, I’d be happy to see the griz roll by 30.
Win/win I suppose?
In the scenario the Cats win cat/griz, the Cats seed won’t be affected much by a griz loss this week. Whether they beat a #4 griz or a #8 griz in week 13 is pretty inconsequential, it’ll still be a top 10 road win for the Cats.
The Cats will come in at 2, 3 or 4 in the seeds if they win out. A lot of variables will affect that, but I don’t think a griz win/loss this weekend is high on that list of variables.
 
   
   
   
   
   They lost to a TERRIBLE Nevada team (currently their ONLY win, with a home loss to an even more terrible MTSU who lost to FCS Austin Peay by TWENTY).  They lost to Poly AT HOME.  They needed a goal line stand to beat Norther Colorado, again at home.  This is not the marking of a solid team.
  They lost to a TERRIBLE Nevada team (currently their ONLY win, with a home loss to an even more terrible MTSU who lost to FCS Austin Peay by TWENTY).  They lost to Poly AT HOME.  They needed a goal line stand to beat Norther Colorado, again at home.  This is not the marking of a solid team.- 
				MSUBobcat04
- BobcatNation Redshirt
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2021 12:24 pm
- Location: Billings, MT
Re: Sac st president v the um Pandas....
I'll take your opinion with a MASSIVE grain of salt, since you thought SDSU would stay above the Cats, not only with a loss in the Marker, but with a SECOND FCS loss. Turns out, all it took was an injury to Chase Mason and a curb stomping in the Marker for them to drop below, or be tied with, MSU in every poll....Prodigal Cat wrote: ↑Wed Oct 22, 2025 4:25 pmExactly this.Catsrgrood wrote: ↑Wed Oct 22, 2025 3:51 pmThe griz won’t fall out of the top 10 with their first loss being to a solid team on the road. My guess would be somewhere in the 7,8,9 range.MSUBobcat04 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 22, 2025 2:42 pmFor seeding implications, you should want the Griz to win until the Brawl. If they lose to Nut Sac State, they likely fall outside of the top 10, with not much chance to climb, playing the dregs of the Big Sky (BBQ, EWWWW, and Portland St). It's better for the Bobcats to end the season with 2 top 8 (or higher) victories.Catsrgrood wrote: ↑Sun Oct 19, 2025 8:57 amThat would be a horrible interview for anyone involved with the school/football program. But to come from the president of the university?! Woof….
For the seeding implications and general FTG sentiment I have, I’d be happy to see the griz lose.
For the FSS sentiment I’ve quickly gained and to see this guy eat his words once again, I’d be happy to see the griz roll by 30.
Win/win I suppose?
In the scenario the Cats win cat/griz, the Cats seed won’t be affected much by a griz loss this week. Whether they beat a #4 griz or a #8 griz in week 13 is pretty inconsequential, it’ll still be a top 10 road win for the Cats.
The Cats will come in at 2, 3 or 4 in the seeds if they win out. A lot of variables will affect that, but I don’t think a griz win/loss this weekend is high on that list of variables.
https://theanalyst.com/articles/fcs-top ... eek-9-2025
https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/football/ ... aches-poll
https://www.anygivensaturday.com/forum/ ... 025-week-9 <<This poll has the highest accuracy of predicting the field, FYI.




