Takeaways

Discuss anything and everything relating to Bobcat Football here.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

tetoncat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3934
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Montana

Re: Takeaways

Post by tetoncat » Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:21 pm

Common Cat wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:04 pm
Anytime anyone mentions moving up the same five posters who are clearly anti moving up jump in and post the same “oh you want to play in the …..bowl…” and just spew the same stuff over and over again. You can’t even have a conversation about it before gets torpedoed.
What are your top 5 benefits of moving up?


Sports is not bigger than life

User avatar
Common Cat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3446
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Spokane

Re: Takeaways

Post by Common Cat » Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:59 pm

tetoncat wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:21 pm
Common Cat wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:04 pm
Anytime anyone mentions moving up the same five posters who are clearly anti moving up jump in and post the same “oh you want to play in the …..bowl…” and just spew the same stuff over and over again. You can’t even have a conversation about it before gets torpedoed.
What are your top 5 benefits of moving up?
That’s a good question. I don’t know if I have bulleted points. But some quick thoughts…I don’t want MSU to be left behind. I think there will eventually be a group of 5 playoff and a power 4 playoff. I want to be in the mix for that. I’d like to play in a conference with more like peers which in my opinion would look more like the Mountain West. Move up money helps retain coaches and players. We would be in a league with more basketball spots for the NCAA tournament. The FCS competition really is distilling down to about 4 teams- don’t see that changing.


@rfoley77 @rrcatcast Golden Coolie

tetoncat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3934
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Montana

Re: Takeaways

Post by tetoncat » Sun Jan 12, 2025 5:49 pm

Common Cat wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:59 pm
tetoncat wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:21 pm
Common Cat wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:04 pm
Anytime anyone mentions moving up the same five posters who are clearly anti moving up jump in and post the same “oh you want to play in the …..bowl…” and just spew the same stuff over and over again. You can’t even have a conversation about it before gets torpedoed.
What are your top 5 benefits of moving up?
That’s a good question. I don’t know if I have bulleted points. But some quick thoughts…I don’t want MSU to be left behind. I think there will eventually be a group of 5 playoff and a power 4 playoff. I want to be in the mix for that. I’d like to play in a conference with more like peers which in my opinion would look more like the Mountain West. Move up money helps retain coaches and players. We would be in a league with more basketball spots for the NCAA tournament. The FCS competition really is distilling down to about 4 teams- don’t see that changing.
Here are my counter points. If group of 5 playoffs happen Big Sky as a conference can move up. G5 coaches are constantly on move up. While revenue increases coach cost and scholarship cost do also so no extra revenue. If MWC is 50% ex FCS type teams will not get more BB spots. Those were earned by competitiveness of teams that have moved on.


Sports is not bigger than life

User avatar
Bobcat Sig
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3890
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:56 am
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Re: Takeaways

Post by Bobcat Sig » Mon Jan 13, 2025 11:05 am

tetoncat wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 5:49 pm
Common Cat wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:59 pm
tetoncat wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:21 pm
Common Cat wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:04 pm
Anytime anyone mentions moving up the same five posters who are clearly anti moving up jump in and post the same “oh you want to play in the …..bowl…” and just spew the same stuff over and over again. You can’t even have a conversation about it before gets torpedoed.
What are your top 5 benefits of moving up?
That’s a good question. I don’t know if I have bulleted points. But some quick thoughts…I don’t want MSU to be left behind. I think there will eventually be a group of 5 playoff and a power 4 playoff. I want to be in the mix for that. I’d like to play in a conference with more like peers which in my opinion would look more like the Mountain West. Move up money helps retain coaches and players. We would be in a league with more basketball spots for the NCAA tournament. The FCS competition really is distilling down to about 4 teams- don’t see that changing.
Here are my counter points. If group of 5 playoffs happen Big Sky as a conference can move up. G5 coaches are constantly on move up. While revenue increases coach cost and scholarship cost do also so no extra revenue. If MWC is 50% ex FCS type teams will not get more BB spots. Those were earned by competitiveness of teams that have moved on.
While the Big Sky could move up; why? Why would also-rans like PSU and UNCU be in the G5 of the FBS? Per Common Cat's point; moving up leaves behind programs that don't give a rip about football. Moving into a conference with peer institutions would be a huge benefit.


griz fans; keeping it classy and gracious in winning since ... well, never.

tetoncat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3934
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Montana

Re: Takeaways

Post by tetoncat » Mon Jan 13, 2025 4:31 pm

Bobcat Sig wrote:
Mon Jan 13, 2025 11:05 am
tetoncat wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 5:49 pm
Common Cat wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:59 pm
tetoncat wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:21 pm
Common Cat wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:04 pm
Anytime anyone mentions moving up the same five posters who are clearly anti moving up jump in and post the same “oh you want to play in the …..bowl…” and just spew the same stuff over and over again. You can’t even have a conversation about it before gets torpedoed.
What are your top 5 benefits of moving up?
That’s a good question. I don’t know if I have bulleted points. But some quick thoughts…I don’t want MSU to be left behind. I think there will eventually be a group of 5 playoff and a power 4 playoff. I want to be in the mix for that. I’d like to play in a conference with more like peers which in my opinion would look more like the Mountain West. Move up money helps retain coaches and players. We would be in a league with more basketball spots for the NCAA tournament. The FCS competition really is distilling down to about 4 teams- don’t see that changing.
Here are my counter points. If group of 5 playoffs happen Big Sky as a conference can move up. G5 coaches are constantly on move up. While revenue increases coach cost and scholarship cost do also so no extra revenue. If MWC is 50% ex FCS type teams will not get more BB spots. Those were earned by competitiveness of teams that have moved on.
While the Big Sky could move up; why? Why would also-rans like PSU and UNCU be in the G5 of the FBS? Per Common Cat's point; moving up leaves behind programs that don't give a rip about football. Moving into a conference with peer institutions would be a huge benefit.
If those peers stay put, or if they consider MSU and UM peers and even invite them.


Sports is not bigger than life

onceacat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3983
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:35 pm

Re: Takeaways

Post by onceacat » Tue Jan 14, 2025 8:14 pm

I'm with the other pro-move up posters...

To be clear, I much prefer the way the FCS has run its post season for a long time & have no desire to watch the Cats play in the Snoop Dog Lawnmower Corona Bowl.

But I ALSO don't want to go 15-0 beating up on the little sisters of the poor like Utah Tech and Portland State & UNCO and UT-Martin (OMG, in the PLAYOFFS!)

MSU belongs with peer research institutions like Utah State, WSU, Wyoming, Colorado State, the Nevadas & so on. Most importantly, the Cats belong on the field with those teams, not with the vast majority of commuter schools that comprise the FCS.

That world is long gone, its just time (IMO) to accept reality.



Post Reply