Who ya got

allcat · Post by **allcat** » Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:28 am

Pick one

LongTimeCatFan · Post by **LongTimeCatFan** » Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:36 am

Seahawks by 5

91catAlum · Post by **91catAlum** » Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:21 pm

Seahawks in a tight one. Say 24-23.

Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk

77matcat · Post by **77matcat** » Sun Feb 01, 2015 2:07 pm

If the Seahawk defense can get their motor going like last SB It's tough to see a Patriot win albeit Brady may be more successful in avoiding SEahawk blitzes.

I mostly hope for a competitive game

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

bobcatmaniac · Post by **bobcatmaniac** » Sun Feb 01, 2015 10:16 pm

Did get a competitive game. Seahawks show their true colors at the end. Sherman taught them how to behave after last years game. GO PATRIOTS!!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

91catAlum · Post by **91catAlum** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 7:10 am

bobcatmaniac wrote:Did get a competitive game. Seahawks show their true colors at the end. Sherman taught them how to behave after last years game. GO PATRIOTS!!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't think patriots fans should be pointing the "classless" finger at any other pro sports franchises. But congrats on the win.

RickRund · Post by **RickRund** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 7:36 am

I didn't see what Sherman pulled off this year. After what I think was the worst play call ever I left the room.

91catAlum · Post by **91catAlum** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 8:39 am

It's easy to second-guess a play call that doesn't work. But it's 2nd down, there were only 30 seconds left and Seattle had only 1 timeout left. So they could only afford to run it one time. If they run on second down, and don't score, they have to use their final timeout and then are locked into passing on third and fourth downs.
They elected to throw on 2nd down, then if it's incomplete, you can run on third, use your timeout, and run again on 4th. It wasn't the worst play call ever.

LongTimeCatFan · Post by **LongTimeCatFan** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:29 am

No faith in their OL or BeastMode.

I was happy to see that McEndoo and Cramsey both suggested the right call would have been to give it to Lynch. (On Twitter)

77matcat · Post by **77matcat** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:36 am

Wonder what the Pats were expecting????

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

KittieKop · Post by **KittieKop** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:40 am

The beauty and the curse of play calling is either you're a genius or an idiot. Had that play worked it would have been brilliant - throw, 'cause everyone in the house is expecting Lynch. Pass and the INT, you're an idiot - shoulda given it to Lynch. That's why they're called Monday morning quarterbacks.

91catAlum · Post by **91catAlum** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:46 am

77matcat wrote:Wonder what the Pats were expecting????

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They were in an 8 man box. The hawks had 3 wide outs, thus 6 blockers.

91catAlum · Post by **91catAlum** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:52 am

KittieKop wrote:The beauty and the curse of play calling is either you're a genius or an idiot. Had that play worked it would have been brilliant - throw, 'cause everyone in the house is expecting Lynch. Pass and the INT, you're an idiot - shoulda given it to Lynch. That's why they're called Monday morning quarterbacks.

Yep. If they give it to Lynch against the 8 man front and he gets stuffed, or fumbles, everybody would be talking about how arrogant Pete Carroll is for trying to run when the matchup dictated pass.

allcat · Post by **allcat** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:23 am

The whole thing did turn on that 1st int. 27 could not cover Edelman.

wbtfg · Post by **wbtfg** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 2:03 pm

The ending reminded of the end of the MSU/Wazzou game. Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

TIrwin24 · Post by **TIrwin24** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 5:52 pm

wbtfg wrote:The ending reminded of the end of the MSU/Wazzou game. Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

I was more pissed off about that game than yesterday's Super Bowl.

John K · Post by **John K** » Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:10 pm

On a semi-related note, does this game tarnish Peyton Manning's legacy even further, at least in big games? Against Denver last year, the Seattle defense looked like a combination of the Steel Curtain of the 70's, the 1985 Bears, and the 2000 Ravens, and they made Manning look like Farhad Azimi (you've gotta be a diehard Cat fan to remember that name). That same defense looked fairly ordinary against Tom Brady this year, and Brady didn't have nearly as many offensive weapons as Manning.

TIrwin24 · Post by **TIrwin24** » Wed Feb 04, 2015 4:05 pm

John K wrote:On a semi-related note, does this game tarnish Peyton Manning's legacy even further, at least in big games? Against Denver last year, the Seattle defense looked like a combination of the Steel Curtain of the 70's, the 1985 Bears, and the 2000 Ravens, and they made Manning look like Farhad Azimi (you've gotta be a diehard Cat fan to remember that name). That same defense looked fairly ordinary against Tom Brady this year, and Brady didn't have nearly as many offensive weapons as Manning.

Unfortunately, the Seattle defense got completely decimated in the final couple weeks.

Sherman - Tommy John's
Lane - Broken, Broken Arm
Chancellor - Knee
Thomas III - Dislocated Shoulder
Avril - Concussion

wbtfg · Post by **wbtfg** » Wed Feb 04, 2015 7:49 pm

Madden curse strikes again

LongTimeCatFan · Post by **LongTimeCatFan** » Wed Feb 04, 2015 7:51 pm

wbtfg wrote:Madden curse strikes again

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Who ya got

Who ya got

Who ya got

Re: Who ya got

Re: Who ya got

Re: Who ya got

Who ya got

Re: Who ya got

Re: Who ya got

Re: Who ya got

Who ya got

Re: Who ya got

Re: Who ya got

Re: Who ya got

Re: Who ya got

Re: Who ya got

Re: Who ya got

Re: Who ya got

Re: Who ya got

Re: Who ya got

Re: Who ya got

Re: Who ya got