NAU Gameday thread

brother_bluto · Post by **brother_bluto** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 1:47 pm

"22-0 is decent. It's no 51-0 though"

Was at that game in Flagstaff last year, and WOW, what a great performance. my jaw was dropped for days....

gtapp · Post by **gtapp** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 1:59 pm

Lulay has 198 first half yards. The Bobcats as a team have 195 (Bass has -3).

mslacat · Post by **mslacat** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:04 pm

great game! Finally a big lead, lets try to hold it!!!

coachouert · Post by **coachouert** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:05 pm

brother_bluto wrote:"22-0 is decent. It's no 51-0 though"

Was at that game in Flagstaff last year, and WOW, what a great performance. my jaw was dropped for days....

yeah, it was ugly last year during this game at NAU. We hadn't won there in I don't know how long, but came out firing and smoked them.

gtapp · Post by **gtapp** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:08 pm

coachouert wrote:
brother_bluto wrote:"22-0 is decent. It's no 51-0 though"

Was at that game in Flagstaff last year, and WOW, what a great performance. my jaw was dropped for days....
yeah, it was ugly last year during this game at NAU. We hadn't won there in I don't know how long, but came out firing and smoked them.

1979

coachouert · Post by **coachouert** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:09 pm

gtapp wrote:
coachouert wrote:
brother_bluto wrote:"22-0 is decent. It's no 51-0 though"

Was at that game in Flagstaff last year, and WOW, what a great performance. my jaw was dropped for days....
yeah, it was ugly last year during this game at NAU. We hadn't won there in I don't know how long, but came out firing and smoked them.
1979

Thanks

brother_bluto · Post by **brother_bluto** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:10 pm

coachouert wrote:
gtapp wrote:
coachouert wrote:
brother_bluto wrote:"22-0 is decent. It's no 51-0 though"

Was at that game in Flagstaff last year, and WOW, what a great performance. my jaw was dropped for days....
yeah, it was ugly last year during this game at NAU. We hadn't won there in I don't know how long, but came out firing and smoked them.
1979
Thanks

Johnny on the spot with the information, thanks~!

Catdad39 · Post by **Catdad39** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:16 pm

Has Lulay ran for quite a few yards? Does anyone have any stats to share? It is frustrating not to be able to keep track. I have heard bits and pieces because we had guests over.

gtapp · Post by **gtapp** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:18 pm

Catdad39 wrote:Has Lulay ran for quite a few yards? Does anyone have any stats to share? It is frustrating not to be able to keep track. I have heard bits and pieces because we had guests over.

He had 41 yards rushing in the first half. -2 so far second half.

Catdad39 · Post by **Catdad39** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:23 pm

has the offense made any long sustained drives? It sounds like the defense has set up everything? Can somebody fill me in?

coachouert · Post by **coachouert** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:25 pm

Catdad39 wrote:has the offense made any long sustained drives? It sounds like the defense has set up everything? Can somebody fill me in?

First half, we had the ball inside the NAU forty a few times. The scoring drive right before half was our only real sustained drive. We have been struggling this half offensively.

gtapp · Post by **gtapp** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:26 pm

Catdad39 wrote:has the offense made any long sustained drives? It sounds like the defense has set up everything? Can somebody fill me in?

The only long drive was the one at the end of the first half (and that drive only took a minute). For the most part the offense had a very short field in the first half.

coachouert · Post by **coachouert** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:38 pm

I wonder if that 94% accuracy is going to drop after this game for the refs? Good lord, sounds like our receivers are getting mugged!

gtapp · Post by **gtapp** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:40 pm

coachouert wrote:I wonder if that 94% accuracy is going to drop after this game for the refs? Good lord, sounds like our receivers are getting mugged!

The side judge was the best man in my wedding. I will get after him after the game!

Catdad39 · Post by **Catdad39** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:40 pm

We have to keep this drive alive. The offense needs to stick it in the endzone!

coachouert · Post by **coachouert** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:41 pm

It would be super if someone on Offense would figure it out. We can only shoot ourselves in the foot so many times before it's going to bite us.

Catdad39 · Post by **Catdad39** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:41 pm

five turnovers including the botched kick! That is ridiculous!

coachouert · Post by **coachouert** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:46 pm

At least they are calling pass interference one way. Seriously, ridiculous. I'm agitated now. And now no call when Hunter gets tackled. Are you serious clark?

brother_bluto · Post by **brother_bluto** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 3:17 pm

stepped away for a bit, what has happened??

coachouert · Post by **coachouert** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 3:18 pm

brother_bluto wrote:stepped away for a bit, what has happened??

Basically getting worked over right now. Offense can't do anything. Defense can't get a stop. NAU is driving, but still lots of time