coaches corner?
Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
- 94VegasCat
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4378
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 9:38 am
- Location: Physically in northern Montana but my heart and soul are in Bobcat Stadium
-
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3655
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 3:11 pm
- Location: Bozeman
- Helcat72
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4438
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 9:47 pm
- Location: Helena
At QBC Kramer said that we will continue with the roll punt with Bolton. He said the problems Saturday were with missed blocks not with the punt. Otherwise the special teams looked pretty good.
He said Bostick will take over the short snaps and Clive will continue with the long snaps. He said that Carpenter will be the holder.
Lulay will play as the third receiver this week and Evin will probably start at RB with Taito getting some work. I think Mason is a little banged up so I think he gets a rest this week.
Kramer was disappointed with the RB efforts against Weber. He said they both reverted to bad habits.
He said Rolovich was the Big Sky defensive player of the week for taking Mike Jefferson out of the game! He was open all day. When McBride looks at the game films he might reconsider his bold statements about his CB's.
He said Bostick will take over the short snaps and Clive will continue with the long snaps. He said that Carpenter will be the holder.
Lulay will play as the third receiver this week and Evin will probably start at RB with Taito getting some work. I think Mason is a little banged up so I think he gets a rest this week.
Kramer was disappointed with the RB efforts against Weber. He said they both reverted to bad habits.
He said Rolovich was the Big Sky defensive player of the week for taking Mike Jefferson out of the game! He was open all day. When McBride looks at the game films he might reconsider his bold statements about his CB's.
2024 Resume dominance
- HelenaCat95
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6970
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:13 pm
- Location: Helena, Montana
Thanks for the update.Helcat72 wrote:At QBC Kramer said that we will continue with the roll punt with Bolton. He said the problems Saturday were with missed blocks not with the punt. Otherwise the special teams looked pretty good.
He said Bostick will take over the short snaps and Clive will continue with the long snaps. He said that Carpenter will be the holder.
Lulay will play as the third receiver this week and Evin will probably start at RB with Taito getting some work. I think Mason is a little banged up so I think he gets a rest this week.
Kramer was disappointed with the RB efforts against Weber. He said they both reverted to bad habits.
He said Rolovich was the Big Sky defensive player of the week for taking Mike Jefferson out of the game! He was open all day. When McBride looks at the game films he might reconsider his bold statements about his CB's.
I think Kramer is right on the money. I watched the Altitude replay (on DVD) and the roll punts problem is the blocking. If we get that down, then we have a chance with it.
Good to see some changes with the snapping - we have had some problems there. And also good to see Carpenter back in uniform, even if it is only to hold the long snaps.
Did he say anything about UNC's schemes? I honestly don't know if they are a good running or passing team, and what they like to do on Defense....just curious.
- Helcat72
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4438
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 9:47 pm
- Location: Helena
We never discussed UNCHelenaCat95 wrote:Thanks for the update.Helcat72 wrote:At QBC Kramer said that we will continue with the roll punt with Bolton. He said the problems Saturday were with missed blocks not with the punt. Otherwise the special teams looked pretty good.
He said Bostick will take over the short snaps and Clive will continue with the long snaps. He said that Carpenter will be the holder.
Lulay will play as the third receiver this week and Evin will probably start at RB with Taito getting some work. I think Mason is a little banged up so I think he gets a rest this week.
Kramer was disappointed with the RB efforts against Weber. He said they both reverted to bad habits.
He said Rolovich was the Big Sky defensive player of the week for taking Mike Jefferson out of the game! He was open all day. When McBride looks at the game films he might reconsider his bold statements about his CB's.
I think Kramer is right on the money. I watched the Altitude replay (on DVD) and the roll punts problem is the blocking. If we get that down, then we have a chance with it.
Good to see some changes with the snapping - we have had some problems there. And also good to see Carpenter back in uniform, even if it is only to hold the long snaps.
Did he say anything about UNC's schemes? I honestly don't know if they are a good running or passing team, and what they like to do on Defense....just curious.
2024 Resume dominance
- WalkOn79
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3432
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:47 pm
- Location: Bozeman
There was a decent article by Mansch about the UNC match-up in the Trib yesterday. They are predominantly a running team with a back averaging over 100 yards a game, (plays to our defensive strength. Their touchdown to int ratio is about 2 to 14 though, so if they throw, our secondary will gave a BIG day, especially if our front seven bring alot of pressure.
"One of the greatest feelings in the world, moving someone from point A to point B against their will"
Mitch Brott - 2019 Cat / Griz
Mitch Brott - 2019 Cat / Griz
- HelenaCat95
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6970
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:13 pm
- Location: Helena, Montana
Careful....you don't want to get "stuck in Iraq"WalkOn79 wrote:Man, sometimes my typing skills are horrible!!!

just kidding everyone
Last edited by HelenaCat95 on Thu Nov 02, 2006 11:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Member # Retired
- Posts: 2061
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:36 pm
- Location: Helena
Did he happen to say anything about Wheaton? Is he out this week?Helcat72 wrote:At QBC Kramer said that we will continue with the roll punt with Bolton. He said the problems Saturday were with missed blocks not with the punt. Otherwise the special teams looked pretty good.
He said Bostick will take over the short snaps and Clive will continue with the long snaps. He said that Carpenter will be the holder.
Lulay will play as the third receiver this week and Evin will probably start at RB with Taito getting some work. I think Mason is a little banged up so I think he gets a rest this week.
Kramer was disappointed with the RB efforts against Weber. He said they both reverted to bad habits.
He said Rolovich was the Big Sky defensive player of the week for taking Mike Jefferson out of the game! He was open all day. When McBride looks at the game films he might reconsider his bold statements about his CB's.
- longhorn_22
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7592
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 11:43 pm
- Location: Billings/Bozeman
He has a minor shoulder dislocation and is listed as 'highly questionable' for this week. I don't expect him to play at all. Might as well get 3 weeks off to get healthy for the Cat/griz game.canyoncat wrote:Did he happen to say anything about Wheaton? Is he out this week?Helcat72 wrote:At QBC Kramer said that we will continue with the roll punt with Bolton. He said the problems Saturday were with missed blocks not with the punt. Otherwise the special teams looked pretty good.
He said Bostick will take over the short snaps and Clive will continue with the long snaps. He said that Carpenter will be the holder.
Lulay will play as the third receiver this week and Evin will probably start at RB with Taito getting some work. I think Mason is a little banged up so I think he gets a rest this week.
Kramer was disappointed with the RB efforts against Weber. He said they both reverted to bad habits.
He said Rolovich was the Big Sky defensive player of the week for taking Mike Jefferson out of the game! He was open all day. When McBride looks at the game films he might reconsider his bold statements about his CB's.
- SonomaCat
- Moderator
- Posts: 23994
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 7:56 pm
- Location: Sonoma County, CA
- Contact:
Maybe I just don't understand football very well ... but doesn't the roll punt make blocking that much harder and that much higher risk ... and thus when a small mistake is made we give up, say, 9 points? Doesn't the very process of roll punting make blocks more likely than the traditional method ... especially when everybody knows exactly what you are doing?
If we aren't very good at roll punting (and the evidence sure points in that direction, given the points we've handed our opponents coupled with our miserable punting average), why do we keep doing it?
If we average 40 yard punts the rest of the season and don't give up any more blocks, safeties, etc., I will stop complaining. I just have a really hard time accepting Kramer's statements that there isn't something either inherently wrong with the concept or our application of it.
If we aren't very good at roll punting (and the evidence sure points in that direction, given the points we've handed our opponents coupled with our miserable punting average), why do we keep doing it?
If we average 40 yard punts the rest of the season and don't give up any more blocks, safeties, etc., I will stop complaining. I just have a really hard time accepting Kramer's statements that there isn't something either inherently wrong with the concept or our application of it.
- vike_king
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 12:51 pm
- Location: Helena, MT/Chester, MT/Fort Benton, MT
Damn, I won't be there to sing it......Lulay....., Lulay, Lulay, Lulay......Lulay......LuuuLay!Helcat72 wrote:At QBC Kramer said that we will continue with the roll punt with Bolton. He said the problems Saturday were with missed blocks not with the punt. Otherwise the special teams looked pretty good.
He said Bostick will take over the short snaps and Clive will continue with the long snaps. He said that Carpenter will be the holder.
Lulay will play as the third receiver this week........
-
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 4:46 pm
- Location: Helena, MT
Bay Area Cat wrote:Maybe I just don't understand football very well ... but doesn't the roll punt make blocking that much harder and that much higher risk ... and thus when a small mistake is made we give up, say, 9 points? Doesn't the very process of roll punting make blocks more likely than the traditional method ... especially when everybody knows exactly what you are doing?
If we aren't very good at roll punting (and the evidence sure points in that direction, given the points we've handed our opponents coupled with our miserable punting average), why do we keep doing it?
If we average 40 yard punts the rest of the season and don't give up any more blocks, safeties, etc., I will stop complaining. I just have a really hard time accepting Kramer's statements that there isn't something either inherently wrong with the concept or our application of it.
I couldn't agree more. And to add to that, if we're sticking with the roll punt, do we have any left-footed kickers that might possibly roll out to the left? Our punting scheme is just a little too predictable.
Football is not a game but a religion, a metaphysical island of fundamental truth in a highly verbalized, disguised society, a throwback of 30,000 generations of anthropological time. ~Arnold Mandell
- BigSkyCat
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 7:20 pm
- Location: Flathead
Bay Area Cat wrote:Maybe I just don't understand football very well ... but doesn't the roll punt make blocking that much harder and that much higher risk ... and thus when a small mistake is made we give up, say, 9 points? Doesn't the very process of roll punting make blocks more likely than the traditional method ... especially when everybody knows exactly what you are doing?
If we aren't very good at roll punting (and the evidence sure points in that direction, given the points we've handed our opponents coupled with our miserable punting average), why do we keep doing it?
If we average 40 yard punts the rest of the season and don't give up any more blocks, safeties, etc., I will stop complaining. I just have a really hard time accepting Kramer's statements that there isn't something either inherently wrong with the concept or our application of it.

](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
- bcats
- 2nd Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:06 am
- Location: Billings
- Helcat72
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4438
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 9:47 pm
- Location: Helena
Last Saturday Clagett blocked to the inside and the safety did a twist with the DE. Clagett should have picked up the Safety rushing to the outside (his assignment). That was the blocked kick. Other than that...Force started to run and kicked it off his knee. That was when Bolton started to do the kicking.bcats wrote:If we haven't figured out how to successfully block on the roll punt by now are we really going to fugure it out. We haven't figured it out in Kramer's tenure. Teams are sure figuring out how to block though.
2024 Resume dominance
- SonomaCat
- Moderator
- Posts: 23994
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 7:56 pm
- Location: Sonoma County, CA
- Contact:
That kind of reinforces my point ... the blocking scheme for a punt shouldn't be as complicated as a perfectly executed sweep ... it's supposed to be virtually mistake proof (you block the guy who runs toward you ... and if you slow him down even a little, the punter will have plenty of time to get the punt away).Helcat72 wrote:Last Saturday Clagett blocked to the inside and the safety did a twist with the DE. Clagett should have picked up the Safety rushing to the outside (his assignment). That was the blocked kick. Other than that...Force started to run and kicked it off his knee. That was when Bolton started to do the kicking.bcats wrote:If we haven't figured out how to successfully block on the roll punt by now are we really going to fugure it out. We haven't figured it out in Kramer's tenure. Teams are sure figuring out how to block though.
It seems like we are taking something really simple and making it very complicated ... and making a lot of mistakes as a result.