PENALTIES
Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
- catatac
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9710
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:37 pm
PENALTIES
That was friggin ridiculous, on both sides. Just looking at the Cats though, that many flags on us is unacceptable. Seems like we're bad at that, more so on the road for some reason. Absolutely need to get that all cleaned up. On a related note, that targeting call sucked. Ty summed it up really well basically by saying it's BS that Dru gets ejected for that "targeting" call but the guy that smashes Taco after he called for a fair catch... gets to keep playing? Bunch of crap.
Great time to be a BOBCAT!
- 94VegasCat
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 9:38 am
- Location: Physically in northern Montana but my heart and soul are in Bobcat Stadium
Re: PENALTIES
23 total penalties in the Sac-Weber game
I watched several football games yesterday. I think there’s a moratorium on calling holding in Bobcat Stadium only.
I watched several football games yesterday. I think there’s a moratorium on calling holding in Bobcat Stadium only.
GO CATS GO. ESG! GO CATS GO
- technoCat
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:06 pm
- Location: Bozeman
Re: PENALTIES
That should have at the very least been an unsportsmanlike conduct so if he did anything else the rest of the game he's gone. I really really hate when defenders get thrown out for targeting when the offensive player is dropping down. Once you start your approach as a defender you really can't change trajectory midway. I even felt like Dru turned his head specifically not to lead with his helmet. Rule definitely needs to be looked at again.catatac wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 10:25 amThat was friggin ridiculous, on both sides. Just looking at the Cats though, that many flags on us is unacceptable. Seems like we're bad at that, more so on the road for some reason. Absolutely need to get that all cleaned up. On a related note, that targeting call sucked. Ty summed it up really well basically by saying it's BS that Dru gets ejected for that "targeting" call but the guy that smashes Taco after he called for a fair catch... gets to keep playing? Bunch of crap.
DIE HARD CATS FAN SINCE THE DAY I WAS BORN
- RickRund
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8080
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:08 pm
- Location: Post Falls ID
Re: PENALTIES
And Dru has served his penalty in the second half, correct.technoCat wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 10:46 amThat should have at the very least been an unsportsmanlike conduct so if he did anything else the rest of the game he's gone. I really really hate when defenders get thrown out for targeting when the offensive player is dropping down. Once you start your approach as a defender you really can't change trajectory midway. I even felt like Dru turned his head specifically not to lead with his helmet. Rule definitely needs to be looked at again.catatac wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 10:25 amThat was friggin ridiculous, on both sides. Just looking at the Cats though, that many flags on us is unacceptable. Seems like we're bad at that, more so on the road for some reason. Absolutely need to get that all cleaned up. On a related note, that targeting call sucked. Ty summed it up really well basically by saying it's BS that Dru gets ejected for that "targeting" call but the guy that smashes Taco after he called for a fair catch... gets to keep playing? Bunch of crap.
msubobcats@outlook.com
Audiatur et altura pars: Let both sides be fairly heard.
Audi alteram partem: listen to the other side.
Audiatur et altura pars: Let both sides be fairly heard.
Audi alteram partem: listen to the other side.
-
- 2nd Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2022 10:18 am
Re: PENALTIES
I would say that they do need to clean up their game, however, there have been some very flag happy reffing crews.
Flags are going to be more apparent when playing teams with inferior talent, seemed like a lot of our flags came from our guys playing more quickly and more physically than Portland. It’s like when you rough house in your childhood and you’d have that one friend that would no matter what always get hurt or tell on you.
The reffing this year is next level poor, they are unsure and uncertain on calls they make, looking at Danny U’s inadvertent whistle, he should have been continuing to blow that thing to get the play to stop after his oops.
Flags are going to be more apparent when playing teams with inferior talent, seemed like a lot of our flags came from our guys playing more quickly and more physically than Portland. It’s like when you rough house in your childhood and you’d have that one friend that would no matter what always get hurt or tell on you.
The reffing this year is next level poor, they are unsure and uncertain on calls they make, looking at Danny U’s inadvertent whistle, he should have been continuing to blow that thing to get the play to stop after his oops.
- Bobcat4Ever
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3962
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:26 pm
- Location: Bozeman --> Nevada
Re: PENALTIES
I don’t understand that hit on Taco — how could that not be something? After his TD and big run back it was obviously they were “targeting” him.
I saw a lot of ankle/knee twisting going on — guess who taught them that?
I know it was the last minute of the game but there was a huge hold/tackle/pindown that enabled the left side opening. Last minute or not, call the big stuff.
I saw a lot of ankle/knee twisting going on — guess who taught them that?
I know it was the last minute of the game but there was a huge hold/tackle/pindown that enabled the left side opening. Last minute or not, call the big stuff.
- Bobcat Sig
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3890
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:56 am
- Location: Portland, OR
- Contact:
Re: PENALTIES
The targeting penalty on Dru… wasn’t. He barely connected with the PSU player. It happened right in front of us and it certainly didn’t look like targeting. Such calls are incredibly frustrating, and must be hell for players and coaches
griz fans; keeping it classy and gracious in winning since ... well, never.
- Bobcat4Ever
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3962
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:26 pm
- Location: Bozeman --> Nevada
Re: PENALTIES
It barely knocked the PSU player off-stride. Looked like some shoulder contact — Dru turned his head, and did not make any significant contact above the shoulders. If it was targeting — then it was the worst execution I have ever seen. At least knock the guy down.Bobcat Sig wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 11:34 amThe targeting penalty on Dru… wasn’t. He barely connected with the PSU player. It happened right in front of us and it certainly didn’t look like targeting. Such calls are incredibly frustrating, and must be hell for players and coaches

- catatac
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9710
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:37 pm
Re: PENALTIES
Not sure of the question? It was a personal foul.Bobcat4Ever wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 11:32 amI don’t understand that hit on Taco — how could that not be something? After his TD and big run back it was obviously they were “targeting” him.
I saw a lot of ankle/knee twisting going on — guess who taught them that?
I know it was the last minute of the game but there was a huge hold/tackle/pindown that enabled the left side opening. Last minute or not, call the big stuff.
Great time to be a BOBCAT!
-
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2017 1:57 pm
Re: PENALTIES
One of them was blatantly intentional and the other was a hit a little too subjectively high. I don’t disagree with the call on Dru being targeting, but if he is going to be ejected, why wasn’t the guy who hit Taco ejected? If the rule is player safety, then that also needs to be addressed.catatac wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 1:51 pmNot sure of the question? It was a personal foul.Bobcat4Ever wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 11:32 amI don’t understand that hit on Taco — how could that not be something? After his TD and big run back it was obviously they were “targeting” him.
I saw a lot of ankle/knee twisting going on — guess who taught them that?
I know it was the last minute of the game but there was a huge hold/tackle/pindown that enabled the left side opening. Last minute or not, call the big stuff.
-
- BobcatNation Team Captain
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:38 pm
Re: PENALTIES
The guy who hit Taco didn't hit him in the head. Commented to the PSU fans behind me that it was the best tackle they had made all day.Cats92 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 2:56 pmOne of them was blatantly intentional and the other was a hit a little too subjectively high. I don’t disagree with the call on Dru being targeting, but if he is going to be ejected, why wasn’t the guy who hit Taco ejected? If the rule is player safety, then that also needs to be addressed.catatac wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 1:51 pmNot sure of the question? It was a personal foul.Bobcat4Ever wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 11:32 amI don’t understand that hit on Taco — how could that not be something? After his TD and big run back it was obviously they were “targeting” him.
I saw a lot of ankle/knee twisting going on — guess who taught them that?
I know it was the last minute of the game but there was a huge hold/tackle/pindown that enabled the left side opening. Last minute or not, call the big stuff.
Ejection for targeting is specifically to get helmet to helmet contact out of the game. No question that they have gone too far with this, but as long as former players are going to be able to sue the NFL/NCAA for long term effects of head injuries, they will make some sort of effort to show they are making an attempt to limit/ reduce them.
- technoCat
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:06 pm
- Location: Bozeman
Re: PENALTIES
If you are asking a question, yes, Dru is gtg next week.RickRund wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 11:01 amAnd Dru has served his penalty in the second half, correct.technoCat wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 10:46 amThat should have at the very least been an unsportsmanlike conduct so if he did anything else the rest of the game he's gone. I really really hate when defenders get thrown out for targeting when the offensive player is dropping down. Once you start your approach as a defender you really can't change trajectory midway. I even felt like Dru turned his head specifically not to lead with his helmet. Rule definitely needs to be looked at again.catatac wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 10:25 amThat was friggin ridiculous, on both sides. Just looking at the Cats though, that many flags on us is unacceptable. Seems like we're bad at that, more so on the road for some reason. Absolutely need to get that all cleaned up. On a related note, that targeting call sucked. Ty summed it up really well basically by saying it's BS that Dru gets ejected for that "targeting" call but the guy that smashes Taco after he called for a fair catch... gets to keep playing? Bunch of crap.
DIE HARD CATS FAN SINCE THE DAY I WAS BORN
- RickRund
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8080
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:08 pm
- Location: Post Falls ID
Re: PENALTIES
Yep, a question. ThankstechnoCat wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 4:15 pmIf you are asking a question, yes, Dru is gtg next week.RickRund wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 11:01 amAnd Dru has served his penalty in the second half, correct.technoCat wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 10:46 amThat should have at the very least been an unsportsmanlike conduct so if he did anything else the rest of the game he's gone. I really really hate when defenders get thrown out for targeting when the offensive player is dropping down. Once you start your approach as a defender you really can't change trajectory midway. I even felt like Dru turned his head specifically not to lead with his helmet. Rule definitely needs to be looked at again.catatac wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 10:25 amThat was friggin ridiculous, on both sides. Just looking at the Cats though, that many flags on us is unacceptable. Seems like we're bad at that, more so on the road for some reason. Absolutely need to get that all cleaned up. On a related note, that targeting call sucked. Ty summed it up really well basically by saying it's BS that Dru gets ejected for that "targeting" call but the guy that smashes Taco after he called for a fair catch... gets to keep playing? Bunch of crap.
msubobcats@outlook.com
Audiatur et altura pars: Let both sides be fairly heard.
Audi alteram partem: listen to the other side.
Audiatur et altura pars: Let both sides be fairly heard.
Audi alteram partem: listen to the other side.
-
- 2nd Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:46 pm
Re: PENALTIES
4KornerKat wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 3:08 pmThe guy who hit Taco didn't hit him in the head. Commented to the PSU fans behind me that it was the best tackle they had made all day.Cats92 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 2:56 pmOne of them was blatantly intentional and the other was a hit a little too subjectively high. I don’t disagree with the call on Dru being targeting, but if he is going to be ejected, why wasn’t the guy who hit Taco ejected? If the rule is player safety, then that also needs to be addressed.catatac wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 1:51 pmNot sure of the question? It was a personal foul.Bobcat4Ever wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 11:32 amI don’t understand that hit on Taco — how could that not be something? After his TD and big run back it was obviously they were “targeting” him.
I saw a lot of ankle/knee twisting going on — guess who taught them that?
I know it was the last minute of the game but there was a huge hold/tackle/pindown that enabled the left side opening. Last minute or not, call the big stuff.
Ejection for targeting is specifically to get helmet to helmet contact out of the game. No question that they have gone too far with this, but as long as former players are going to be able to sue the NFL/NCAA for long term effects of head injuries, they will make some sort of effort to show they are making an attempt to limit/ reduce them.
So Helmet to Helmet is an ejection, but slamming a player and his head to the ground is not. The rules need to change. I am guessing a players head will absorb a bit more impact than the ground will.4KornerKat wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 3:08 pmThe guy who hit Taco didn't hit him in the head. Commented to the PSU fans behind me that it was the best tackle they had made all day.Cats92 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 2:56 pmOne of them was blatantly intentional and the other was a hit a little too subjectively high. I don’t disagree with the call on Dru being targeting, but if he is going to be ejected, why wasn’t the guy who hit Taco ejected? If the rule is player safety, then that also needs to be addressed.catatac wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 1:51 pmNot sure of the question? It was a personal foul.Bobcat4Ever wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 11:32 amI don’t understand that hit on Taco — how could that not be something? After his TD and big run back it was obviously they were “targeting” him.
I saw a lot of ankle/knee twisting going on — guess who taught them that?
I know it was the last minute of the game but there was a huge hold/tackle/pindown that enabled the left side opening. Last minute or not, call the big stuff.
Ejection for targeting is specifically to get helmet to helmet contact out of the game. No question that they have gone too far with this, but as long as former players are going to be able to sue the NFL/NCAA for long term effects of head injuries, they will make some sort of effort to show they are making an attempt to limit/ reduce them.
- catatac
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9710
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:37 pm
Re: PENALTIES
Yes, correct. That was the reason for my comment about this in my post. Totally agree.St George wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 8:20 pm4KornerKat wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 3:08 pmThe guy who hit Taco didn't hit him in the head. Commented to the PSU fans behind me that it was the best tackle they had made all day.Cats92 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 2:56 pmOne of them was blatantly intentional and the other was a hit a little too subjectively high. I don’t disagree with the call on Dru being targeting, but if he is going to be ejected, why wasn’t the guy who hit Taco ejected? If the rule is player safety, then that also needs to be addressed.catatac wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 1:51 pmNot sure of the question? It was a personal foul.Bobcat4Ever wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 11:32 amI don’t understand that hit on Taco — how could that not be something? After his TD and big run back it was obviously they were “targeting” him.
I saw a lot of ankle/knee twisting going on — guess who taught them that?
I know it was the last minute of the game but there was a huge hold/tackle/pindown that enabled the left side opening. Last minute or not, call the big stuff.
Ejection for targeting is specifically to get helmet to helmet contact out of the game. No question that they have gone too far with this, but as long as former players are going to be able to sue the NFL/NCAA for long term effects of head injuries, they will make some sort of effort to show they are making an attempt to limit/ reduce them.So Helmet to Helmet is an ejection, but slamming a player and his head to the ground is not. The rules need to change. I am guessing a players head will absorb a bit more impact than the ground will.4KornerKat wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 3:08 pmThe guy who hit Taco didn't hit him in the head. Commented to the PSU fans behind me that it was the best tackle they had made all day.Cats92 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 2:56 pmOne of them was blatantly intentional and the other was a hit a little too subjectively high. I don’t disagree with the call on Dru being targeting, but if he is going to be ejected, why wasn’t the guy who hit Taco ejected? If the rule is player safety, then that also needs to be addressed.catatac wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 1:51 pmNot sure of the question? It was a personal foul.Bobcat4Ever wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 11:32 amI don’t understand that hit on Taco — how could that not be something? After his TD and big run back it was obviously they were “targeting” him.
I saw a lot of ankle/knee twisting going on — guess who taught them that?
I know it was the last minute of the game but there was a huge hold/tackle/pindown that enabled the left side opening. Last minute or not, call the big stuff.
Ejection for targeting is specifically to get helmet to helmet contact out of the game. No question that they have gone too far with this, but as long as former players are going to be able to sue the NFL/NCAA for long term effects of head injuries, they will make some sort of effort to show they are making an attempt to limit/ reduce them.
Great time to be a BOBCAT!
- GoCats18
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3938
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:06 pm
- Location: MT
Re: PENALTIES
Cats made a lot of bonehead penalties. What’s crazy to me though is as little of the Griz I can stand to watch, I see at least two or three helmet to helmet hits that don’t get called or even reviewed. Cats seem to get called for it all the time. But, if this team wants to have home field advantage through the playoffs, they need to clean up the stupid penalties that could easily be avoided.
Punters are people too!!
-
- Honorable Mention All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 823
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:04 am
Re: PENALTIES
Dru will not be playing this next weekend.technoCat wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 4:15 pmIf you are asking a question, yes, Dru is gtg next week.RickRund wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 11:01 amAnd Dru has served his penalty in the second half, correct.technoCat wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 10:46 amThat should have at the very least been an unsportsmanlike conduct so if he did anything else the rest of the game he's gone. I really really hate when defenders get thrown out for targeting when the offensive player is dropping down. Once you start your approach as a defender you really can't change trajectory midway. I even felt like Dru turned his head specifically not to lead with his helmet. Rule definitely needs to be looked at again.catatac wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 10:25 amThat was friggin ridiculous, on both sides. Just looking at the Cats though, that many flags on us is unacceptable. Seems like we're bad at that, more so on the road for some reason. Absolutely need to get that all cleaned up. On a related note, that targeting call sucked. Ty summed it up really well basically by saying it's BS that Dru gets ejected for that "targeting" call but the guy that smashes Taco after he called for a fair catch... gets to keep playing? Bunch of crap.
-
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3935
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:14 pm
- Location: Montana
Re: PENALTIES
None of the Cats will bewapiti wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 9:27 pmDru will not be playing this next weekend.technoCat wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 4:15 pmIf you are asking a question, yes, Dru is gtg next week.RickRund wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 11:01 amAnd Dru has served his penalty in the second half, correct.technoCat wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 10:46 amThat should have at the very least been an unsportsmanlike conduct so if he did anything else the rest of the game he's gone. I really really hate when defenders get thrown out for targeting when the offensive player is dropping down. Once you start your approach as a defender you really can't change trajectory midway. I even felt like Dru turned his head specifically not to lead with his helmet. Rule definitely needs to be looked at again.catatac wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 10:25 amThat was friggin ridiculous, on both sides. Just looking at the Cats though, that many flags on us is unacceptable. Seems like we're bad at that, more so on the road for some reason. Absolutely need to get that all cleaned up. On a related note, that targeting call sucked. Ty summed it up really well basically by saying it's BS that Dru gets ejected for that "targeting" call but the guy that smashes Taco after he called for a fair catch... gets to keep playing? Bunch of crap.
Sports is not bigger than life
- MSU Toddler
- 1st Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:19 am
- Location: Helena, MT
Re: PENALTIES
10 penalties for 114 yards resulting in two TDs recalled and one player ejection
Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.
- grizzh8r
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7264
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 11:23 pm
- Location: Billings via Livingston
Re: PENALTIES
... and that doesn't hold a candle to the Weber Sac St. game. I believe the total was 23 penalties, split 11-12...MSU Toddler wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 9:41 pm10 penalties for 114 yards resulting in two TDs recalled and one player ejection
Eric Curry STILL makes me sad.

94VegasCat wrote:Are you for real? That is just a plain ol dumb paragraph! You just nailed every note in the Full Reetard sing-a-long choir!!!
