from the gf trib (football)
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:09 am
Kramer says 2006 won't be a rebuilding year for his program, which has enjoyed four consecutive winning seasons.
An offensive line that returns starters Brant Birkeland, Joe Hirst and Peder Jensen could be a team strength. Massive Louis Saucedo has been moved from the defensive line back to offense and will replace Bolton, and second-team all-league tight end Elliott Barnhart leads a trio of veterans who return at that all-important position.
Nice Sig....catamaran wrote:More than likely, that is based on the fact that Jeff began the season as a guard then moved. Lou is probably too tall to be a center. That big body would clog up alot of passing lanes
God I hope he was just making a point - a sort of Kramerism - about the 7 receivers. There are other positions as well that could use a few backups and we don't need to be 3 varsity deep at every receiver spot. Half of our new signees as transfer receivers doesn't bode too well for the future. I still like the idea of recruiting freshman and developing them instead of getting transfers. If you get players that only give you 1 or 2 years they are coming to play for themselves for the most part. These aren't the kind of people who become lifelong MSU ambassadors and financial contributors. A few for sure - but not 7.catsrback76 wrote:who indicated he might bring in as many as seven transfer wideouts. "By getting not only good players, but numbers."
It will be an interesting passing game as well. I think we can expect lots of short passes and a run heavy offense.
I would say that he is correct, that the cats have had 4 consecutive winning seasons.MSUCATS wrote:I saw this in the Gt. Falls Tribune article:
Kramer says 2006 won't be a rebuilding year for his program, which has enjoyed four consecutive winning seasons.![]()
I wonder what eastcoastgriz has to say about this one!!
From the Trib article...MSUCATS wrote:I saw this in the Gt. Falls Tribune article:
Kramer says 2006 won't be a rebuilding year for his program, which has enjoyed four consecutive winning seasons.![]()
I wonder what eastcoastgriz has to say about this one!!
Kind of sounds like a rebuilding year to me.The QB for the future is going to have to have poise more than power it looks like. It sounds like a Carpenter/Rolovich battle to be sure.
Quote: "There are no proven receivers who return.
"We're probably the most shallow athletically there that we've ever been and we need to attend to that in a pretty forceful way," said Kramer, who indicated he might bring in as many as seven transfer wideouts.
maybe, but we dont want to say so yet. first we will talk a bunch of crap about making a run at a national championship. then we'll bash the griz for a while and tell them how much we own them. then, after a few losses in the middle of the season, we'll make excuses for whatever part of the team is playing poorly whether it be offense, defense, special teams or a combination of the three. we'll have excuses already lined up such as inexperience at qb, key losses in our defense, and poor coaching. once those get overplayed, we'll pull out the "rebuilding" card to make a final excuse for our teams poor play. did i miss anything?Eastcoastgriz wrote:From the Trib article...MSUCATS wrote:I saw this in the Gt. Falls Tribune article:
Kramer says 2006 won't be a rebuilding year for his program, which has enjoyed four consecutive winning seasons.![]()
I wonder what eastcoastgriz has to say about this one!!
Kind of sounds like a rebuilding year to me.The QB for the future is going to have to have poise more than power it looks like. It sounds like a Carpenter/Rolovich battle to be sure.
Quote: "There are no proven receivers who return.
"We're probably the most shallow athletically there that we've ever been and we need to attend to that in a pretty forceful way," said Kramer, who indicated he might bring in as many as seven transfer wideouts.
I'm still anxious to see younger Lulay in action. Actually surprised that he hasn't seen the field much. There were a couple times when the starters weren't performing well and you'd think Kramer would have thrown him in there for a few plays. If nothing else - for the fresh legs, speed and Lulay to Lulay novelty appeal... Don't think he would have hurt us and he just may have caught fire. I hope he works his way into a starting spot in 06 because there's obviously some kind of winning mojo in the Lulay blood.CelticCat wrote:I want no more than 3 WR transfers. I want to see some of the younger guys develop... Mike Brown, Derek Green, etc.
Wheaton
transfer
Brown
transfer
Green
Roosevelt (if he is still here?)
Also, I like how Kramer made it sound like it is Carpenter's job to lose. I want to see him suceed.
All in all, I have a quiet confidence that we might win the Sky next year and surprise people who think we don't stand a chance without Lulay.