Positives/Negative
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:37 am
First let me point out that PSU is a pretty darn good football team. They have played some very tough competition this year and had Boise State on the ropes the week before at their place.
**** POSITIVES****
1) Offense starting to get in synch and using the whole field. We pretty much use Gatewood as our first down rusher now (I bet he had 6-8 passes caught on first down for 4-6 yards).
2) Lulay had some very very nice throws in that game and seems to be getting a lot nicer touch on his long balls. The TD to Murray in the endzone was RIGHT ON THE MONEY.
3) Groves looks like he can be the MAN in this offense. He is shifty and can make guys miss. If someone misses a tackle on him in the LB/Secondary this kid can take it to the house.
4) Pass blocking was pretty darn good for most of the game. Lulay had quite a bit of time there (until that darn hit at the end). Did anyone see how that guy got through? Was it a missed block on the tackle or did RB not pick him up? I didn't really see who was the one that missed that block or if there was just more guys coming than there were blockers.
**** NEGATIVES ****
1) Kick Offs/Coverage - How can our coverage be that bad on a consistent basis? I mean you think we would even get lucky on a few kicks just making a tackle/runner running wrong way. They were on the 35+ every time almost. I am not a fan of the pooch kick, but I guess if it is going to be that bad (which it shouldn't be) kick the ball out of bounds every time then I guess.
2) False Starts/Delay of game penalties (we scored 41 points, but could have had more). 2 separate drives that were stalled by penalties (including the one that Lulay got his punt blocked).
3) Tackling - Again, we are at the point of attack and everyone wants the big hit on the guy (tackling up high). How about bend your knees and tackle the guy. They really really really need to practice tackling on defense. They have guys there usually on initial contact and we still do not make the play. Also, like what was mentioned on another thread .. where is our gang/swarm tackling that we are known for? We need that as if a guy misses the swarm is there to take him down. A 3-4 defense is all about guys with speed running to the ball. It seems like we are rushing 3-4 guys (3 a lot on 3rd down) and just playing a soft zone with people standing around? That is not how a 3-4 is suppossed to be played? 3-4 is an ATTACKING defense designed to CONFUSE the defense. We definately need to come up with more scheme/zone blitzes to keep the offenses out of their comfort zones. The soft zone is just like a zone in Basketball. It will work or a quarter or two, but eventually the offense will adjust and find soft spots in it and start lighting you up.
I really like coach Piatowski (sp) as a defensive coordinater, but I almost think the 3-4 isn't his thing so far (or he is just learning on it). I understand why we are playing it due to our injuries/depth/fast LB's .. but if we can't disguise it/shake up what we are doing from play to play the good teams will chew up yards on the field on us. Our STUD LB's need to start tackling better as well. We cannot miss tackles like that.
*** DISHONAREABLE MENTION ****
Big Sky Refs - Again, a spectactular showing by the refs in this game (on both sides) .. NOT! It was really bad in the Griz game too. I guess we are just going to have to put up with this from week to week and hope the BAD balances itself out.
**** POSITIVES****
1) Offense starting to get in synch and using the whole field. We pretty much use Gatewood as our first down rusher now (I bet he had 6-8 passes caught on first down for 4-6 yards).
2) Lulay had some very very nice throws in that game and seems to be getting a lot nicer touch on his long balls. The TD to Murray in the endzone was RIGHT ON THE MONEY.
3) Groves looks like he can be the MAN in this offense. He is shifty and can make guys miss. If someone misses a tackle on him in the LB/Secondary this kid can take it to the house.
4) Pass blocking was pretty darn good for most of the game. Lulay had quite a bit of time there (until that darn hit at the end). Did anyone see how that guy got through? Was it a missed block on the tackle or did RB not pick him up? I didn't really see who was the one that missed that block or if there was just more guys coming than there were blockers.
**** NEGATIVES ****
1) Kick Offs/Coverage - How can our coverage be that bad on a consistent basis? I mean you think we would even get lucky on a few kicks just making a tackle/runner running wrong way. They were on the 35+ every time almost. I am not a fan of the pooch kick, but I guess if it is going to be that bad (which it shouldn't be) kick the ball out of bounds every time then I guess.
2) False Starts/Delay of game penalties (we scored 41 points, but could have had more). 2 separate drives that were stalled by penalties (including the one that Lulay got his punt blocked).
3) Tackling - Again, we are at the point of attack and everyone wants the big hit on the guy (tackling up high). How about bend your knees and tackle the guy. They really really really need to practice tackling on defense. They have guys there usually on initial contact and we still do not make the play. Also, like what was mentioned on another thread .. where is our gang/swarm tackling that we are known for? We need that as if a guy misses the swarm is there to take him down. A 3-4 defense is all about guys with speed running to the ball. It seems like we are rushing 3-4 guys (3 a lot on 3rd down) and just playing a soft zone with people standing around? That is not how a 3-4 is suppossed to be played? 3-4 is an ATTACKING defense designed to CONFUSE the defense. We definately need to come up with more scheme/zone blitzes to keep the offenses out of their comfort zones. The soft zone is just like a zone in Basketball. It will work or a quarter or two, but eventually the offense will adjust and find soft spots in it and start lighting you up.
I really like coach Piatowski (sp) as a defensive coordinater, but I almost think the 3-4 isn't his thing so far (or he is just learning on it). I understand why we are playing it due to our injuries/depth/fast LB's .. but if we can't disguise it/shake up what we are doing from play to play the good teams will chew up yards on the field on us. Our STUD LB's need to start tackling better as well. We cannot miss tackles like that.
*** DISHONAREABLE MENTION ****
Big Sky Refs - Again, a spectactular showing by the refs in this game (on both sides) .. NOT! It was really bad in the Griz game too. I guess we are just going to have to put up with this from week to week and hope the BAD balances itself out.