Cats vs. Griz - recruiting advantages (split)

Discuss anything and everything relating to Bobcat Football here.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

Cat Grad
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7463
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:05 am

Post by Cat Grad » Wed Dec 06, 2006 12:47 pm

Air_Griz wrote:WOW. IS THIS THREAD LOADED WITH CAT SMACK OR WHAT??

BAC AND THE MODERATORS HAVE LOST ALL CREDIBILITY.

LIKE I SAID:

SMACK IS IN THE EYES OF THE BEHOLDER - I MEAN MODERATOR.
Stating facts with the data to substantiate those facts can never be construed as "smack" and that's a fact. Only lawyers are able to make a living distorting facts :evil:



Topher
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 312
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Key to real estate
Contact:

Post by Topher » Wed Dec 06, 2006 12:47 pm

Bay Area Cat wrote:
STREETCAT wrote:
GRIZNBZMN wrote:
You hit the nail on the head???
Then can you tell me what MSU has over UM in a recruiting battle? Honestly- you're an 18 year old and visiting both venues...

amazing stadium, great facilities, 23K loud "smart" (ask Coach Kill of S. Illinois, said they were the most knowledgeable fans in the country, actually U.S. is what he said, verbatim) great tailgates, not to mention streak of playoff appearances as well as national championship appearances

vs.

decent stadium (it's getting better), don't know about the facilities, 11-13K fans (depending on the weather), mediocre records, not even sure what they are but seem to lose around 4 games a year, and one playoff in the last how many years?

Tell me where you'd go? Be honest!
WELL IF I WANTED TO BE AN ART MAJOR OR LETS SEE, A FILM MAJOR, OR SETTLE FOR A BUSINESS DEGREE THEN UM

BUT IF I WANT TO BE AN ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, PRE-MED, OR ANY SCIENCE MAJOR, I WOULD GO TO BOZEMAN

HAVENT YOU SEEN THE COMERCIALS? ALLMOST ALL ATHLETES GO PRO IN SOMETHING ELSE.
MSU has a great film program, actually. MSU has a very good (arguably much better than UM) business program as well.

I could take exception to your "settle for a business degree" statement ... but I'm not that insecure. I guess those of us business majors who donate to MSU will just have to find someplace that appreciates our money, eh?
Ok, I have to admit, I get a little muddled when it comes to people arguing the phantom superiority of MSU academia. I got my degree in Psychology, a field MSU offers significantly fewer courses in. My class also boasted the son of a Professor teaching at MSU. When I asked him why he chose to attend the U he claimed, "because it has a better Psychology program", and when asked why, "more opportunities". It is a fact, check your class listings!

We have produced more Rhodes scholars than you have (17th in the Nation, 5th in public schools), and we have a little thing called the Davidson's Honors College for students who want a higher challenge. I looked EQUALLY at both schools, and The University of Montana was the better choice for academic reasons.

They are both third tier State schools. If you are holding on to the glory of MSU academics as a reason for looking down upon The University of Montana than you are living in a fantasy world. Both schools provide equal opportunity for students desiring to achieve their goals in the real world.

And as for the original poster whom insists on gloating about a stadium he had absolutely nothing to do with here are a few answers to your question.
1) MSU is a better fit for their style of play
2) Had/has a family whom played/plays for the Cats
3) Chance to play right away, or perhaps UM is already set in his position (more playing opportunities)
4) Grew up a Cat fan (it's not that hard to believe, it happens)
5) Likes the coaching perosnal at MSU better
6) Prefers going to school in Bozeman
7) Wants to get a degree in a field MSU has a stronger background. I have a friend whom chose to play football at Montana Tech over the I-AA schools because he liked their engineer program. Plus UM and MSU wanted him to walk and see what happens.
8) Former High School teammates now play for the Cats/Current friends also play for the Cats
9) Family lives closer to Bozeman/Easier for them to watch him play at MSU-Stay closer to family
10) Attended games at both Universities and preferred MSU (this also happens).

So in conclusion, You need more than the ominous "we have higher standards" to convince me MSU is a better school (don't get me wrong I think MSU provides every opportunity in the world for students, I just believe UM does this equally). There are MANY reasons why a Montana highschool football player would choose MSU over UM. I have listed 10 good ones. Peace


Baha Men....Soooooo much more than "Who Let The Dogs Out"

User avatar
rtb
Moderator
Posts: 8027
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:15 pm
Location: Bend, OR
Contact:

Post by rtb » Wed Dec 06, 2006 12:50 pm

Air_Griz wrote:WOW. IS THIS THREAD LOADED WITH CAT SMACK OR WHAT??

BAC AND THE MODERATORS HAVE LOST ALL CREDIBILITY.

LIKE I SAID:

SMACK IS IN THE EYES OF THE BEHOLDER - I MEAN MODERATOR.
WOW! Air_Griz I love how you are the only guy that still hasn't figured this out. If a thread is started out as pure smack then we usually move it. If a thread actually has substance and is going somewhere we will either try to filter out the smack or move the whole thread. Sometimes we actually let things go if the thread in general is still progressing. It is called judgement, you should try it sometime.

Secondly, I don't know if you noticed but you are at BOBCATnation.com. That means it is a place generally designed for MSU fans to chat and talk about what's happening so little jabs here and there at the expense of UM really don't get us to worked up.

Third, you have proven yourself to be a true pain in the ass who doesn't really add anything of value to the boards. You can stop complaining about us being unfair and put up with it, or you can leave. You make the choice.
Last edited by rtb on Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.


Randy B. - MSU '04 Image

Cat Grad
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7463
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:05 am

Post by Cat Grad » Wed Dec 06, 2006 12:56 pm

Topher wrote:
Bay Area Cat wrote:
STREETCAT wrote:
GRIZNBZMN wrote:
You hit the nail on the head???
Then can you tell me what MSU has over UM in a recruiting battle? Honestly- you're an 18 year old and visiting both venues...

amazing stadium, great facilities, 23K loud "smart" (ask Coach Kill of S. Illinois, said they were the most knowledgeable fans in the country, actually U.S. is what he said, verbatim) great tailgates, not to mention streak of playoff appearances as well as national championship appearances

vs.

decent stadium (it's getting better), don't know about the facilities, 11-13K fans (depending on the weather), mediocre records, not even sure what they are but seem to lose around 4 games a year, and one playoff in the last how many years?

Tell me where you'd go? Be honest!
WELL IF I WANTED TO BE AN ART MAJOR OR LETS SEE, A FILM MAJOR, OR SETTLE FOR A BUSINESS DEGREE THEN UM

BUT IF I WANT TO BE AN ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, PRE-MED, OR ANY SCIENCE MAJOR, I WOULD GO TO BOZEMAN

HAVENT YOU SEEN THE COMERCIALS? ALLMOST ALL ATHLETES GO PRO IN SOMETHING ELSE.
MSU has a great film program, actually. MSU has a very good (arguably much better than UM) business program as well.

I could take exception to your "settle for a business degree" statement ... but I'm not that insecure. I guess those of us business majors who donate to MSU will just have to find someplace that appreciates our money, eh?
Ok, I have to admit, I get a little muddled when it comes to people arguing the phantom superiority of MSU academia. I got my degree in Psychology, a field MSU offers significantly fewer courses in. My class also boasted the son of a Professor teaching at MSU. When I asked him why he chose to attend the U he claimed, "because it has a better Psychology program", and when asked why, "more opportunities". It is a fact, check your class listings!

We have produced more Rhodes scholars than you have (17th in the Nation, 5th in public schools), and we have a little thing called the Davidson's Honors College for students who want a higher challenge. I looked EQUALLY at both schools, and The University of Montana was the better choice for academic reasons.

They are both third tier State schools. If you are holding on to the glory of MSU academics as a reason for looking down upon The University of Montana than you are living in a fantasy world. Both schools provide equal opportunity for students desiring to achieve their goals in the real world.

And as for the original poster whom insists on gloating about a stadium he had absolutely nothing to do with here are a few answers to your question.
1) MSU is a better fit for their style of play
2) Had/has a family whom played/plays for the Cats
3) Chance to play right away, or perhaps UM is already set in his position (more playing opportunities)
4) Grew up a Cat fan (it's not that hard to believe, it happens)
5) Likes the coaching perosnal at MSU better
6) Prefers going to school in Bozeman
7) Wants to get a degree in a field MSU has a stronger background. I have a friend whom chose to play football at Montana Tech over the I-AA schools because he liked their engineer program. Plus UM and MSU wanted him to walk and see what happens.
8) Former High School teammates now play for the Cats/Current friends also play for the Cats
9) Family lives closer to Bozeman/Easier for them to watch him play at MSU-Stay closer to family
10) Attended games at both Universities and preferred MSU (this also happens).

So in conclusion, You need more than the ominous "we have higher standards" to convince me MSU is a better school (don't get me wrong I think MSU provides every opportunity in the world for students, I just believe UM does this equally). There are MANY reasons why a Montana highschool football player would choose MSU over UM. I have listed 10 good ones. Peace
Again, an attempt to distort reality. Forgot about the psychos. Go to the regents and get a psychiatric department to go with your pharmacy school...



Topher
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 312
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Key to real estate
Contact:

Post by Topher » Wed Dec 06, 2006 12:57 pm

Cat Grad wrote:
Topher wrote:
Bay Area Cat wrote:
STREETCAT wrote:
GRIZNBZMN wrote:
You hit the nail on the head???
Then can you tell me what MSU has over UM in a recruiting battle? Honestly- you're an 18 year old and visiting both venues...

amazing stadium, great facilities, 23K loud "smart" (ask Coach Kill of S. Illinois, said they were the most knowledgeable fans in the country, actually U.S. is what he said, verbatim) great tailgates, not to mention streak of playoff appearances as well as national championship appearances

vs.

decent stadium (it's getting better), don't know about the facilities, 11-13K fans (depending on the weather), mediocre records, not even sure what they are but seem to lose around 4 games a year, and one playoff in the last how many years?

Tell me where you'd go? Be honest!
WELL IF I WANTED TO BE AN ART MAJOR OR LETS SEE, A FILM MAJOR, OR SETTLE FOR A BUSINESS DEGREE THEN UM

BUT IF I WANT TO BE AN ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, PRE-MED, OR ANY SCIENCE MAJOR, I WOULD GO TO BOZEMAN

HAVENT YOU SEEN THE COMERCIALS? ALLMOST ALL ATHLETES GO PRO IN SOMETHING ELSE.
MSU has a great film program, actually. MSU has a very good (arguably much better than UM) business program as well.

I could take exception to your "settle for a business degree" statement ... but I'm not that insecure. I guess those of us business majors who donate to MSU will just have to find someplace that appreciates our money, eh?
Ok, I have to admit, I get a little muddled when it comes to people arguing the phantom superiority of MSU academia. I got my degree in Psychology, a field MSU offers significantly fewer courses in. My class also boasted the son of a Professor teaching at MSU. When I asked him why he chose to attend the U he claimed, "because it has a better Psychology program", and when asked why, "more opportunities". It is a fact, check your class listings!

We have produced more Rhodes scholars than you have (17th in the Nation, 5th in public schools), and we have a little thing called the Davidson's Honors College for students who want a higher challenge. I looked EQUALLY at both schools, and The University of Montana was the better choice for academic reasons.

They are both third tier State schools. If you are holding on to the glory of MSU academics as a reason for looking down upon The University of Montana than you are living in a fantasy world. Both schools provide equal opportunity for students desiring to achieve their goals in the real world.

And as for the original poster whom insists on gloating about a stadium he had absolutely nothing to do with here are a few answers to your question.
1) MSU is a better fit for their style of play
2) Had/has a family whom played/plays for the Cats
3) Chance to play right away, or perhaps UM is already set in his position (more playing opportunities)
4) Grew up a Cat fan (it's not that hard to believe, it happens)
5) Likes the coaching perosnal at MSU better
6) Prefers going to school in Bozeman
7) Wants to get a degree in a field MSU has a stronger background. I have a friend whom chose to play football at Montana Tech over the I-AA schools because he liked their engineer program. Plus UM and MSU wanted him to walk and see what happens.
8) Former High School teammates now play for the Cats/Current friends also play for the Cats
9) Family lives closer to Bozeman/Easier for them to watch him play at MSU-Stay closer to family
10) Attended games at both Universities and preferred MSU (this also happens).

So in conclusion, You need more than the ominous "we have higher standards" to convince me MSU is a better school (don't get me wrong I think MSU provides every opportunity in the world for students, I just believe UM does this equally). There are MANY reasons why a Montana highschool football player would choose MSU over UM. I have listed 10 good ones. Peace
Again, an attempt to distort reality. Forgot about the psychos. Go to the regents and get a psychiatric department to go with your pharmacy school...
I don't see how this supports claims of MSU academic superiority, in fact I'm not so sure this was your intent.


Baha Men....Soooooo much more than "Who Let The Dogs Out"

User avatar
SonomaCat
Moderator
Posts: 23996
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Contact:

Post by SonomaCat » Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:05 pm

Air_Griz wrote:WOW. IS THIS THREAD LOADED WITH CAT SMACK OR WHAT??

BAC AND THE MODERATORS HAVE LOST ALL CREDIBILITY.

LIKE I SAID:

SMACK IS IN THE EYES OF THE BEHOLDER - I MEAN MODERATOR.
Perhaps you should boycott this site as a statement of protest?



Topher
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 312
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Key to real estate
Contact:

Post by Topher » Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:08 pm

Bay Area Cat wrote:
Air_Griz wrote:WOW. IS THIS THREAD LOADED WITH CAT SMACK OR WHAT??

BAC AND THE MODERATORS HAVE LOST ALL CREDIBILITY.

LIKE I SAID:

SMACK IS IN THE EYES OF THE BEHOLDER - I MEAN MODERATOR.
Perhaps in protest you should boycott this site?
Seriously Air_Griz why are you not content with the fact the Griz are playing well? I just don't understand people enjoying their program doing well only if it makes fans of other programs miserable.


Baha Men....Soooooo much more than "Who Let The Dogs Out"

Air_Griz
BobcatNation Redshirt
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:01 pm

Post by Air_Griz » Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:21 pm

Topher wrote:
Bay Area Cat wrote:
Air_Griz wrote:WOW. IS THIS THREAD LOADED WITH CAT SMACK OR WHAT??

BAC AND THE MODERATORS HAVE LOST ALL CREDIBILITY.

LIKE I SAID:

SMACK IS IN THE EYES OF THE BEHOLDER - I MEAN MODERATOR.
Perhaps in protest you should boycott this site?
Seriously Air_Griz why are you not content with the fact the Griz are playing well? I just don't understand people enjoying their program doing well only if it makes fans of other programs miserable.
Hey. I am very content with the Griz program right now. We will be very fortunate to beat a great UMass team this weekend, but the Griz have already had a good season.

On this Board, however, I never put the Cats down. Review my posts. I only call BS when people put the Griz and the Griz program down. In those cases, I call BS and post positive things about the Griz. So, perhaps I should just let it go and forget about posting here. Great advice.



CatFamily
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 329
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 4:09 pm
Location: Eastern Montana Fighting Bobcat Fan

Post by CatFamily » Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:24 pm

Topher... I like your response. I believe the original post was actually a stab at smack but it also could draw both sides into good discussion. I am in agreement with you... both schools are solid in their core areas.... where both have the same degrees offered... for example... psych that you took and accounting that I took at MSU... UM may have a little more to offer in psych but MSU has a little more to offer in accounting. But both schools grads have potential for job opportunities that are mostly equal and depend on the student performance, interviews, etc.. I am a solid Bobcat fan... as you know and should also be after the influence you were given as you went through high school... but I am also a supporter of both universities academics. MSU is solid in sciences, engineering, agriculture and business... UM in forestry, etc...


Montana State Fighting Bobcats reign supreme

Topher
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 312
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Key to real estate
Contact:

Post by Topher » Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:31 pm

CatFamily wrote:Topher... I like your response. I believe the original post was actually a stab at smack but it also could draw both sides into good discussion. I am in agreement with you... both schools are solid in their core areas.... where both have the same degrees offered... for example... psych that you took and accounting that I took at MSU... UM may have a little more to offer in psych but MSU has a little more to offer in accounting. But both schools grads have potential for job opportunities that are mostly equal and depend on the student performance, interviews, etc.. I am a solid Bobcat fan... as you know and should also be after the influence you were given as you went through high school... but I am also a supporter of both universities academics. MSU is solid in sciences, engineering, agriculture and business... UM in forestry, etc...
CatFamily,

Your wisdom sounds familiar. It is as if I have heard this voice before, somewhere deep in my past. How's it going? I agree with the smack, it never should have been posted in this forum.

I have more, but I'm gunna just PM you.


Baha Men....Soooooo much more than "Who Let The Dogs Out"

User avatar
Bleedinbluengold
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3427
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 10:24 am
Location: Belly of the Beast

Post by Bleedinbluengold » Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:39 pm

In terms of athletic facilities, I've been in both. MSU has the clear advantage when comparing the locker rooms, training rooms, etc. UM gets the nod when comparing the stadiums, but MSU has the clear advantage in the sky suites.

Technically, Hoffenbacher was not offered a full scholarship by both schools, but it was very clear that he could go to either school and both schools had similar, if not equal offers on the table. He chose MSU.

I can't remember the exact circumstances, but Mark Desin also could have gone to both schools. He chose MSU, and that made the dominos fall on a couple other kids who chose UM.

So, I think a reasonable person would say that the gap between the two football programs has narrowed, and the decision to attend um versus MSU may not be as obvious as it has been. I think a reasonable person would also say that the gap between the programs will continue to narrow down the road, and that future choices will be based not only the program, but also on the educational opportunities to a greater extent.

As for which university has "better" academics, I think such comparisons are like comparing apples to oranges. Both schools excel in many fields, and I think you can get a quality education at either place.


Montana State IS what "they" think Montana is.

User avatar
FiveApples
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 102
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:42 am
Location: The Great State of Montana

Post by FiveApples » Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:39 pm

GRIZNBZMN wrote:Quote:
I'm not trying to offend you
If all you want an answer, then quit arguing when you're given one.


To repeat what others have said, requires education; to challenge it, requires brains.

User avatar
CelticCat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 12292
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 12:55 pm
Location: Upper Northwest WA
Contact:

Post by CelticCat » Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:40 pm

A couple things to consider:

1. How many MT kids plan on going professional in football? I would be less than 1%. That is going to factor into your collegiate decision. Education is almost if not just as important (should be more important but let's be realistic) as playing football.

2. If you were to pick a school purely on football reasons, of course a majority of kids would want to go to the U. But coaching staff, style of offense/defense also play a role.

Then of course family ties, lifelong loyalties, etc play a role. Playing time will be a factor as well.


R&R Cat Cast - the #1 Bobcat fan podcast - https://www.rrcatcast.com
Twitter - https://twitter.com/rrcatcast

User avatar
SonomaCat
Moderator
Posts: 23996
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Contact:

Post by SonomaCat » Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:42 pm

Air_Griz wrote:On this Board, however, I never put the Cats down. Review my posts. I only call BS when people put the Griz and the Griz program down. In those cases, I call BS and post positive things about the Griz. So, perhaps I should just let it go and forget about posting here. Great advice.
You actually didn't say anything to defend the Griz program(s). You instead just bitched about the moderators (as per usual). If you want to participate in a thread, then do so. If you don't, then don't.



User avatar
MTBobcatFan
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:27 pm

Post by MTBobcatFan » Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:44 pm

GRIZNBZMN wrote:
You hit the nail on the head???
Then can you tell me what MSU has over UM in a recruiting battle? Honestly- you're an 18 year old and visiting both venues...

amazing stadium, great facilities, 23K loud "smart" (ask Coach Kill of S. Illinois, said they were the most knowledgeable fans in the country, actually U.S. is what he said, verbatim) great tailgates, not to mention streak of playoff appearances as well as national championship appearances

vs.

decent stadium (it's getting better), don't know about the facilities, 11-13K fans (depending on the weather), mediocre records, not even sure what they are but seem to lose around 4 games a year, and one playoff in the last how many years?

Tell me where you'd go? Be honest!

I like how Griz fans like to point out when their fans are called "smart". Seriously, how hard is it to figure out to yell when the opponent has the ball? It's something you can train a drunk lab monkey to do.
Last edited by MTBobcatFan on Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.



User avatar
94VegasCat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4388
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 9:38 am
Location: Physically in northern Montana but my heart and soul are in Bobcat Stadium

Post by 94VegasCat » Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:45 pm

I would consider the coaches and their personalities as an option. Kramer can sell ice cubes to eskimos and Huack is a chump


GO CATS GO. ESG! GO CATS GO

User avatar
bobcatmaniac
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1863
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:25 pm
Location: big sky country

Post by bobcatmaniac » Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:46 pm

GRIZNBZMN wrote:
You hit the nail on the head???
Then can you tell me what MSU has over UM in a recruiting battle? Honestly- you're an 18 year old and visiting both venues...

amazing stadium, great facilities, 23K loud "smart" (ask Coach Kill of S. Illinois, said they were the most knowledgeable fans in the country, actually U.S. is what he said, verbatim) great tailgates, not to mention streak of playoff appearances as well as national championship appearances

vs.

decent stadium (it's getting better), don't know about the facilities, 11-13K fans (depending on the weather), mediocre records, not even sure what they are but seem to lose around 4 games a year, and one playoff in the last how many years?

Tell me where you'd go? Be honest!
You have to decide what your ultimate goal is with the scholarship bucks. Spending four years playing ball? The ultimate goal is to get a great education to have a productive life. You make it sound like life ends at age 22, well it is just beginning. Those four or five years can be fantastic at a "decent stadium" with (?) facilities and 13+ fans (not depending on weather) and records that are only getting better. Not to mention coaches and mentors that care about your future as an MSU graduate.



User avatar
bobcatmaniac
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1863
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:25 pm
Location: big sky country

Post by bobcatmaniac » Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:52 pm

MTBobcatFan wrote:
GRIZNBZMN wrote:
You hit the nail on the head???
Then can you tell me what MSU has over UM in a recruiting battle? Honestly- you're an 18 year old and visiting both venues...

amazing stadium, great facilities, 23K loud "smart" (ask Coach Kill of S. Illinois, said they were the most knowledgeable fans in the country, actually U.S. is what he said, verbatim) great tailgates, not to mention streak of playoff appearances as well as national championship appearances

vs.

decent stadium (it's getting better), don't know about the facilities, 11-13K fans (depending on the weather), mediocre records, not even sure what they are but seem to lose around 4 games a year, and one playoff in the last how many years?

Tell me where you'd go? Be honest!

I like how Griz fans like to point out when their fans are called "smart". Seriously, how hard is it to figure out to yell when the opponent has the ball? It's something you can train a drunk lab monkey to do.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: =D^ =D^



User avatar
1BadBobcat
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1374
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 10:42 pm
Location: On hiatus

Post by 1BadBobcat » Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:54 pm

Bleedinbluengold wrote:In terms of athletic facilities, I've been in both. MSU has the clear advantage when comparing the locker rooms, training rooms, etc. UM gets the nod when comparing the stadiums, but MSU has the clear advantage in the sky suites.

Technically, Hoffenbacher was not offered a full scholarship by both schools, but it was very clear that he could go to either school and both schools had similar, if not equal offers on the table. He chose MSU.

I can't remember the exact circumstances, but Mark Desin also could have gone to both schools. He chose MSU, and that made the dominos fall on a couple other kids who chose UM.

So, I think a reasonable person would say that the gap between the two football programs has narrowed, and the decision to attend um versus MSU may not be as obvious as it has been. I think a reasonable person would also say that the gap between the programs will continue to narrow down the road, and that future choices will be based not only the program, but also on the educational opportunities to a greater extent.

As for which university has "better" academics, I think such comparisons are like comparing apples to oranges. Both schools excel in many fields, and I think you can get a quality education at either place.
You are referring to Selle from Billings West, right? I believe he was offered from both schools and it looked good for MSU, but Desin committed earlier and Selle opted for UM (they both are QBs and had personality conflicts from what I hear).


“If you've got them by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow.” - John Wayne -

Cat Grad
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7463
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:05 am

Post by Cat Grad » Wed Dec 06, 2006 2:01 pm

MTBobcatFan wrote:
GRIZNBZMN wrote:
You hit the nail on the head???
Then can you tell me what MSU has over UM in a recruiting battle? Honestly- you're an 18 year old and visiting both venues...

amazing stadium, great facilities, 23K loud "smart" (ask Coach Kill of S. Illinois, said they were the most knowledgeable fans in the country, actually U.S. is what he said, verbatim) great tailgates, not to mention streak of playoff appearances as well as national championship appearances

vs.

decent stadium (it's getting better), don't know about the facilities, 11-13K fans (depending on the weather), mediocre records, not even sure what they are but seem to lose around 4 games a year, and one playoff in the last how many years?

Tell me where you'd go? Be honest!

I like how Griz fans like to point out when their fans are called "smart". Seriously, how hard is it to figure out to yell when the opponent has the ball? It's something you can train a drunk lab monkey to do.
Are you implying the crowd in Denny's Sandbox are usually drunk lab monkies?



Post Reply