Bay Area Cat wrote:STREETCAT wrote:GRIZNBZMN wrote:You hit the nail on the head???
Then can you tell me what MSU has over UM in a recruiting battle? Honestly- you're an 18 year old and visiting both venues...
amazing stadium, great facilities, 23K loud "smart" (ask Coach Kill of S. Illinois, said they were the most knowledgeable fans in the country, actually U.S. is what he said, verbatim) great tailgates, not to mention streak of playoff appearances as well as national championship appearances
vs.
decent stadium (it's getting better), don't know about the facilities, 11-13K fans (depending on the weather), mediocre records, not even sure what they are but seem to lose around 4 games a year, and one playoff in the last how many years?
Tell me where you'd go? Be honest!
WELL IF I WANTED TO BE AN ART MAJOR OR LETS SEE, A FILM MAJOR, OR SETTLE FOR A BUSINESS DEGREE THEN UM
BUT IF I WANT TO BE AN ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, PRE-MED, OR ANY SCIENCE MAJOR, I WOULD GO TO BOZEMAN
HAVENT YOU SEEN THE COMERCIALS? ALLMOST ALL ATHLETES GO PRO IN SOMETHING ELSE.
MSU has a great film program, actually. MSU has a very good (arguably much better than UM) business program as well.
I could take exception to your "settle for a business degree" statement ... but I'm not that insecure. I guess those of us business majors who donate to MSU will just have to find someplace that appreciates our money, eh?
Ok, I have to admit, I get a little muddled when it comes to people arguing the phantom superiority of MSU academia. I got my degree in Psychology, a field MSU offers significantly fewer courses in. My class also boasted the son of a Professor teaching at MSU. When I asked him why he chose to attend the U he claimed, "because it has a better Psychology program", and when asked why, "more opportunities". It is a fact, check your class listings!
We have produced more Rhodes scholars than you have (17th in the Nation, 5th in public schools), and we have a little thing called the Davidson's Honors College for students who want a higher challenge. I looked EQUALLY at both schools, and The University of Montana was the better choice for academic reasons.
They are both third tier State schools. If you are holding on to the glory of MSU academics as a reason for looking down upon The University of Montana than you are living in a fantasy world. Both schools provide equal opportunity for students desiring to achieve their goals in the real world.
And as for the original poster whom insists on gloating about a stadium he had absolutely nothing to do with here are a few answers to your question.
1) MSU is a better fit for their style of play
2) Had/has a family whom played/plays for the Cats
3) Chance to play right away, or perhaps UM is already set in his position (more playing opportunities)
4) Grew up a Cat fan (it's not that hard to believe, it happens)
5) Likes the coaching perosnal at MSU better
6) Prefers going to school in Bozeman
7) Wants to get a degree in a field MSU has a stronger background. I have a friend whom chose to play football at Montana Tech over the I-AA schools because he liked their engineer program. Plus UM and MSU wanted him to walk and see what happens.

Former High School teammates now play for the Cats/Current friends also play for the Cats
9) Family lives closer to Bozeman/Easier for them to watch him play at MSU-Stay closer to family
10) Attended games at both Universities and preferred MSU (this also happens).
So in conclusion, You need more than the ominous "we have higher standards" to convince me MSU is a better school (don't get me wrong I think MSU provides every opportunity in the world for students, I just believe UM does this equally). There are MANY reasons why a Montana highschool football player would choose MSU over UM. I have listed 10 good ones. Peace