CATS IN? CATS OUT?

Discuss anything and everything relating to Bobcat Football here.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

User avatar
Cat-theotherwhitemeat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3156
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 5:45 pm
Location: Billings
Contact:

Post by Cat-theotherwhitemeat » Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:44 pm

tetoncat wrote: This team should not be judged solely on a playoff run. The seniors have helped turn this program in the right direction.
I agree, and they certainly have turned the program around. However, I'd be willing to bet the players, as well as most fans, will be disappointed with no playoff victories this year.

Anyone? Beuller? Cat Fans?


It just goes to prove that expectations in Bozo have changed. As Martha would say....it's a good thing (Not that I watch her). :-)


My avatar does not now, nor has in the past, depict a person of mentally challenged state. If you have a problem with it, please call the U.S. department of Bite my A$$. MTBuff/Administrator.

User avatar
Hell's Bells
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4692
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:58 pm
Location: Belgrade, Mt.
Contact:

Post by Hell's Bells » Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:45 pm

Cat-theotherwhitemeat wrote:
tetoncat wrote: This team should not be judged solely on a playoff run. The seniors have helped turn this program in the right direction.
I agree, and they certainly have turned the program around. However, I'd be willing to bet the players, as well as most fans, will be disappointed with no playoff victories this year.

Anyone? Beuller? Cat Fans?


It just goes to prove that expectations in Bozo have changed. As Martha would say....it's a good thing (Not that I watch her). :-)
yes it is a good thing


This space for rent....

grizbeer
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 330
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:00 am
Location: Missoula

Post by grizbeer » Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:50 pm

anacondagriz wrote:
iaafan wrote:If MSU loses to EW and beats UM, then MSU gets in ahead of UM. Here's why, both have 7 wins vs. Div I, but since MSU beat UM, MSU gets in. EW wins autobid (Notice I didn't say MSU would get in, just that they'd get in before UM).
Your assuming that this is a perfect world. Yes both teams would have 7 wins & the Cats will have beaten the Griz. BUT!!! the committee would have no responsibility to take the Cats over the Griz. Don't forget attendance seems to mean a lot in I-AA world. Also the Griz have a much better national reputation as far as the playoffs go. Not too mention the fact that the committe would probably look at the Griz wins over Cal Poly & PSU very favorably. Not saying this is fair or even that I agree with it, but I think it is the case.
Plus you have to throw in that UM would only have 3 losses to MSU's 4. Ga Southern beat Furman this week, and Furman is still ranked 4 positions higher than Ga. Southern in the polls.

If the Griz beat Sac State this weekend you can print the 1st round home playoff tickets for UM next Monday.



tetoncat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3934
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Montana

Post by tetoncat » Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:54 pm

What a crock of beans, Griz get ranked off of reputation not necessarily performance. I admit they have been winning, but if they had started the season where they should have based on no offense for 3 weeks (other than against that high school team) they would have been ranked from 10-20. Its easy to be at that top 5 when you start there. Plus so many other teams have been knocked off. No dominant team in the IAA this year.


Sports is not bigger than life

User avatar
jagur1
Member # Retired
Posts: 2015
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:53 pm
Location: Billings

Post by jagur1 » Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:58 pm

:-# ](*,) #-o :crazy: :bs: :-#


Never mistake activity for accomplishment.

I'm sick of the man because the man is a thief.

Four

Scrogger
BobcatNation Redshirt
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 12:03 pm

Post by Scrogger » Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:59 pm

Ok the what if game:

Currently:
UM 4-1
MSU 4-1
EWU 4-2
WSU 4-2

Next weeks is UM wins; EWU beats the Cats; and Weber beats PSU.

UM 5-1
MSU 4-2
EWU 5-2
WSU 5-2

Final Week: Cats over Griz:

WSU 5-2
EWU 5-2
MSU 5-2
UM 5-2

Who would get the Auto bid? and how do you decide on at-large?



User avatar
anacondagriz
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 442
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 4:03 pm

Post by anacondagriz » Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:02 pm

Scrogger wrote:Ok the what if game:

Currently:
UM 4-1
MSU 4-1
EWU 4-2
WSU 4-2

Next weeks is UM wins; EWU beats the Cats; and Weber beats PSU.

UM 5-1
MSU 4-2
EWU 5-2
WSU 5-2

Final Week: Cats over Griz:

WSU 5-2
EWU 5-2
MSU 5-2
UM 5-2

Who would get the Auto bid? and how do you decide on at-large?
EWU gets the auto bid. I dont think there is any possible way for Weber to get the autobid.



User avatar
anacondagriz
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 442
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 4:03 pm

Post by anacondagriz » Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:05 pm

tetoncat wrote:What a crock of beans, Griz get ranked off of reputation not necessarily performance. I admit they have been winning, but if they had started the season where they should have based on no offense for 3 weeks (other than against that high school team) they would have been ranked from 10-20. Its easy to be at that top 5 when you start there. Plus so many other teams have been knocked off. No dominant team in the IAA this year.
This is true of all college football. Look at USC & Texas, who is to say Bama isn't better than both of them, but the other 2 started ranked higher so if they win they play for title no matter what Bama does.



User avatar
Cat-theotherwhitemeat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3156
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 5:45 pm
Location: Billings
Contact:

Post by Cat-theotherwhitemeat » Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:08 pm

jagur1 wrote::-# ](*,) #-o :crazy: :bs: :-#
:penalty: Penalty on Jagur....using too many emoticons, fifteen yards, repeat first down.


My avatar does not now, nor has in the past, depict a person of mentally challenged state. If you have a problem with it, please call the U.S. department of Bite my A$$. MTBuff/Administrator.

User avatar
jagur1
Member # Retired
Posts: 2015
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:53 pm
Location: Billings

Post by jagur1 » Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:10 pm

:lol: :-#


Never mistake activity for accomplishment.

I'm sick of the man because the man is a thief.

Four

grizbeer
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 330
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:00 am
Location: Missoula

Post by grizbeer » Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:31 pm

Scrogger wrote:Ok the what if game:

Currently:
UM 4-1
MSU 4-1
EWU 4-2
WSU 4-2

Next weeks is UM wins; EWU beats the Cats; and Weber beats PSU.

UM 5-1
MSU 4-2

EWU 5-2
WSU 5-2

Final Week: Cats over Griz:

WSU 5-2
EWU 5-2
MSU 5-2
UM 5-2

Who would get the Auto bid? and how do you decide on at-large?
EWU get the auto bid, based on beating 2 of the other 3 5-2 teams, and beating MSU head-to-head.

UM gets an at-large based on an 8-3 overall record, high ranking in the polls.

Depending on what happens with other conferences I think MSU will also get an at-large based on a 7-4 record with all D-I games and a good schedule, assuming after the loss to EWU MSU stays in the top 20 in the polls (which they should).

Here is a comparison of rankings, and I think this tracks pretty closely with GPI, so it should be pretty useful for figuring out relative strength. Note that using these rankings it is hard to believe MSU would fall far with a loss to EWU, and Um shouldn't fall far with a loss to MSU.

http://www.mratings.com/cf/compare1aa.htm

Note also this dilrod Elrod rankings, pretty much the definition of east coast bias (well Souther, or anti-west bias to be more accurate). Here is how he ranks some of the teams in the west:
UM #12
MSU #20
PSU #26
Cal Poly #35
NDSU #41
EWU #47
Weber State #49
UC Davis #52

At the same time here is his top 10:
#1 Appalachian State
#2 Texas State
#3 Hampton
#4 Ga Southern
#5 Furman
#6 New Hampshire
#7 UMass
#8 S Illinois
#9 Youngstown State
#10 W Kentucky
#11 W Carolina

So using his ranking, Montana would be the 5th best team in the Southern Conference, 4th best in the Gateway, and 3rd best in the A-10.

MSU would be the 6th best team in the Southern (just 1 spot ahead of Wofford, 5th in the Gateway, 5th in the A-10, 3rd in the Ivy, and 3rd in the MEAC. Basically according to this guys ranking MSU would be a bottom feeder in every other major conference.

To top it off, here is his rankings for I-A teams:
USC #5
Oregon #15



Eastcoastgriz
Member # Retired
Posts: 2151
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 5:43 am
Location: Use to be New Jersey

Post by Eastcoastgriz » Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:44 pm

anacondagriz wrote:
iaafan wrote:If MSU loses to EW and beats UM, then MSU gets in ahead of UM. Here's why, both have 7 wins vs. Div I, but since MSU beat UM, MSU gets in. EW wins autobid (Notice I didn't say MSU would get in, just that they'd get in before UM).
Your assuming that this is a perfect world. Yes both teams would have 7 wins & the Cats will have beaten the Griz. BUT!!! the committee would have no responsibility to take the Cats over the Griz. Don't forget attendance seems to mean a lot in I-AA world. Also the Griz have a much better national reputation as far as the playoffs go. Not too mention the fact that the committe would probably look at the Griz wins over Cal Poly & PSU very favorably. Not saying this is fair or even that I agree with it, but I think it is the case.
Also Griz would probably be ranked higher than the cats, even with a loss to them.


The GRIZ, a quarter century of total football dominance over the cats.

iaafan
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7502
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 12:44 pm

Post by iaafan » Mon Nov 07, 2005 5:10 pm

Eastcoastgriz wrote:
anacondagriz wrote:
iaafan wrote:If MSU loses to EW and beats UM, then MSU gets in ahead of UM. Here's why, both have 7 wins vs. Div I, but since MSU beat UM, MSU gets in. EW wins autobid (Notice I didn't say MSU would get in, just that they'd get in before UM).
Your assuming that this is a perfect world. Yes both teams would have 7 wins & the Cats will have beaten the Griz. BUT!!! the committee would have no responsibility to take the Cats over the Griz. Don't forget attendance seems to mean a lot in I-AA world. Also the Griz have a much better national reputation as far as the playoffs go. Not too mention the fact that the committe would probably look at the Griz wins over Cal Poly & PSU very favorably. Not saying this is fair or even that I agree with it, but I think it is the case.
Also Griz would probably be ranked higher than the cats, even with a loss to them.
Not so fast my friends....The committee will have a hard time sneaking UM in w/o MSU noticing. They don't want to feel the heat, so if they let UM in, then they will let MSU in, too. Can you see them sweating? "Oh we'll just let UM in and make MSU stay home. They won't notice." After MSU just beat UM. The committes names are made public. Esp. if MSU wins the game decidedly. Say MSU 34, UM 13.
Also, MSU damn near beat an OSU team that was up 28-9 on the No. 2 ranked Texas Longhorns. When it's real close those kinds of things will/should be pointed out.



iaafan
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7502
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 12:44 pm

Post by iaafan » Mon Nov 07, 2005 5:13 pm

grizbeer wrote:
Scrogger wrote:Ok the what if game:

Currently:
UM 4-1
MSU 4-1
EWU 4-2
WSU 4-2

Next weeks is UM wins; EWU beats the Cats; and Weber beats PSU.

UM 5-1
MSU 4-2

EWU 5-2
WSU 5-2

Final Week: Cats over Griz:

WSU 5-2
EWU 5-2
MSU 5-2
UM 5-2

Who would get the Auto bid? and how do you decide on at-large?
EWU get the auto bid, based on beating 2 of the other 3 5-2 teams, and beating MSU head-to-head.

UM gets an at-large based on an 8-3 overall record, high ranking in the polls.

Depending on what happens with other conferences I think MSU will also get an at-large based on a 7-4 record with all D-I games and a good schedule, assuming after the loss to EWU MSU stays in the top 20 in the polls (which they should).

Here is a comparison of rankings, and I think this tracks pretty closely with GPI, so it should be pretty useful for figuring out relative strength. Note that using these rankings it is hard to believe MSU would fall far with a loss to EWU, and Um shouldn't fall far with a loss to MSU.

http://www.mratings.com/cf/compare1aa.htm

Note also this dilrod Elrod rankings, pretty much the definition of east coast bias (well Souther, or anti-west bias to be more accurate). Here is how he ranks some of the teams in the west:
UM #12
MSU #20
PSU #26
Cal Poly #35
NDSU #41
EWU #47
Weber State #49
UC Davis #52

At the same time here is his top 10:
#1 Appalachian State
#2 Texas State
#3 Hampton
#4 Ga Southern
#5 Furman
#6 New Hampshire
#7 UMass
#8 S Illinois
#9 Youngstown State
#10 W Kentucky
#11 W Carolina

So using his ranking, Montana would be the 5th best team in the Southern Conference, 4th best in the Gateway, and 3rd best in the A-10.

MSU would be the 6th best team in the Southern (just 1 spot ahead of Wofford, 5th in the Gateway, 5th in the A-10, 3rd in the Ivy, and 3rd in the MEAC. Basically according to this guys ranking MSU would be a bottom feeder in every other major conference.

To top it off, here is his rankings for I-A teams:
USC #5
Oregon #15
Good grief. Is Elrod included in the GPI ratings?



User avatar
BozoneCat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3227
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:15 pm
Location: Boise, ID

Post by BozoneCat » Mon Nov 07, 2005 5:40 pm

I have absolutely ZERO respect for anyone that would rank Hampton as the #3 team in the nation. What a joke. Hampton is barely better than a mid-major. I guarantee they will lose their home game in the first round of the playoffs.

And anyone who ranks USC at #5 should just be drug out into the street and shot! :shock:


GO CATS GO!!!

Image

Eastcoastgriz
Member # Retired
Posts: 2151
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 5:43 am
Location: Use to be New Jersey

Post by Eastcoastgriz » Mon Nov 07, 2005 6:04 pm

iaafan wrote:
Not so fast my friends....The committee will have a hard time sneaking UM in w/o MSU noticing. They don't want to feel the heat, so if they let UM in, then they will let MSU in, too. Can you see them sweating? "Oh we'll just let UM in and make MSU stay home. They won't notice." After MSU just beat UM. The committes names are made public. Esp. if MSU wins the game decidedly. Say MSU 34, UM 13.
Also, MSU damn near beat an OSU team that was up 28-9 on the No. 2 ranked Texas Longhorns. When it's real close those kinds of things will/should be pointed out.
First their names are already public.

Second, I don’t think they care about the heat.

Third, one of the over ridding factors is the $ and nobody brings more to the table than the GRIZ.


The GRIZ, a quarter century of total football dominance over the cats.

User avatar
Helcat72
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4432
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 9:47 pm
Location: Helena

Post by Helcat72 » Mon Nov 07, 2005 6:25 pm

iaafan wrote:
Eastcoastgriz wrote:
anacondagriz wrote:
iaafan wrote:If MSU loses to EW and beats UM, then MSU gets in ahead of UM. Here's why, both have 7 wins vs. Div I, but since MSU beat UM, MSU gets in. EW wins autobid (Notice I didn't say MSU would get in, just that they'd get in before UM).
Your assuming that this is a perfect world. Yes both teams would have 7 wins & the Cats will have beaten the Griz. BUT!!! the committee would have no responsibility to take the Cats over the Griz. Don't forget attendance seems to mean a lot in I-AA world. Also the Griz have a much better national reputation as far as the playoffs go. Not too mention the fact that the committe would probably look at the Griz wins over Cal Poly & PSU very favorably. Not saying this is fair or even that I agree with it, but I think it is the case.
Also Griz would probably be ranked higher than the cats, even with a loss to them.
Not so fast my friends....The committee will have a hard time sneaking UM in w/o MSU noticing. They don't want to feel the heat, so if they let UM in, then they will let MSU in, too. Can you see them sweating? "Oh we'll just let UM in and make MSU stay home. They won't notice." After MSU just beat UM. The committes names are made public. Esp. if MSU wins the game decidedly. Say MSU 34, UM 13.
Also, MSU damn near beat an OSU team that was up 28-9 on the No. 2 ranked Texas Longhorns. When it's real close those kinds of things will/should be pointed out.
Isn't Pete Fields on the committee?


2024 Resume dominance

User avatar
El_Gato
Member # Retired
Posts: 2926
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 5:07 pm
Location: Kalispell

Post by El_Gato » Mon Nov 07, 2005 6:28 pm

Yes, he is but he cannot cast an at-large vote for MSU.

I'm sure he'll be doing plenty of "lobbying" however...
:wink:


Grizzlies: 2-5 when it matters most

User avatar
grizzh8r
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7257
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 11:23 pm
Location: Billings via Livingston

Post by grizzh8r » Mon Nov 07, 2005 8:59 pm

grizbeer wrote:Plus you have to throw in that UM would only have 3 losses to MSU's 4.
FYI, If we finish 7-4, one of those losses would be to Okla. State, giving us 3 DI-AA losses.


Eric Curry STILL makes me sad.
94VegasCat wrote:Are you for real? That is just a plain ol dumb paragraph! You just nailed every note in the Full Reetard sing-a-long choir!!!
:rofl:

Catz Rock
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 118
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:49 pm
Location: BILLINGS

Post by Catz Rock » Mon Nov 07, 2005 10:29 pm

Cat-theotherwhitemeat wrote:EWU losses, they're done. If the Cats lose, do they get in with a 7-4 record (providing they beat the Griz)? I know I wouldn't feel too secure about it.

Here's a thought:
I'm going to go ahead and assume that UM beats Sac State this weekend, in effect clinching at least at large bid. If the Griz go ahead and win the conference and the autobid, it's very plausible that the Big Sky only gets one team in as all the other teams will have at least 4 losses. Both MSU and EWU will have one loss to a I-A team. Thereby, making it imperative that the Cats come away with the dubya this weekend.

So, if the Cats win this weekend, but lose to the Griz, will they get in? Hmmmmm, time to ponder. 8)

I'll say this, if I were a Cat fan and the Cats didn't get in the playoff's and do some damage during Lulay's senior year, I'd be a little sour. :x
Cat-theotherwhitemeat..... Is that your graduation picture?

NICE!!!! :wink:


Never give up! Never give in! And kick some grizzle @$$.

Post Reply