Yes, we're ahead, BUT...
Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
- El_Gato
- Member # Retired
- Posts: 2926
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 5:07 pm
- Location: Kalispell
Yes, we're ahead, BUT...
It almost looks like we're trying to set a new standard for HORRIBLE special teams play.
Yes, we've had some good returns by Lewis & Austin, but we've had a penalty on nearly every kick, the ridiculous play at the goal line by Lewis, and are you seriously telling me that we don't have a SINGLE player on our roster who was a conventional punter in High School?
The D looks good and the O looks good enough, but if we don't win this game, a large part of the blame should go squarely on our punt units; they are essentially responsible for 9 of Weber's 12 points.
Yes, we've had some good returns by Lewis & Austin, but we've had a penalty on nearly every kick, the ridiculous play at the goal line by Lewis, and are you seriously telling me that we don't have a SINGLE player on our roster who was a conventional punter in High School?
The D looks good and the O looks good enough, but if we don't win this game, a large part of the blame should go squarely on our punt units; they are essentially responsible for 9 of Weber's 12 points.
Grizzlies: 2-5 when it matters most
- HelenaCat95
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6970
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:13 pm
- Location: Helena, Montana
Re: Yes, we're ahead, BUT...
El_Gato wrote:It almost looks like we're trying to set a new standard for HORRIBLE special teams play.
Yes, we've had some good returns by Lewis & Austin, but we've had a penalty on nearly every kick, the ridiculous play at the goal line by Lewis, and are you seriously telling me that we don't have a SINGLE player on our roster who was a conventional punter in High School?
The D looks good and the O looks good enough, but if we don't win this game, a large part of the blame should go squarely on our punt units; they are essentially responsible for 9 of Weber's 12 points.
You are absolutely correct. They almost cost us the game last week. What is it with our "not so special" teams??
-
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3655
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 3:11 pm
- Location: Bozeman
Re: Yes, we're ahead, BUT...
As Ron White almost once said "You can't coach stupid". I know this has to ultimately fall on Kramer's shoulders. But seriously! Blatant blocks in the back? Forgetting if you are on punt return or punt team (at least that's what it looked like on Lewis' play at the goal line on the safety.HelenaCat95 wrote:El_Gato wrote:It almost looks like we're trying to set a new standard for HORRIBLE special teams play.
Yes, we've had some good returns by Lewis & Austin, but we've had a penalty on nearly every kick, the ridiculous play at the goal line by Lewis, and are you seriously telling me that we don't have a SINGLE player on our roster who was a conventional punter in High School?
The D looks good and the O looks good enough, but if we don't win this game, a large part of the blame should go squarely on our punt units; they are essentially responsible for 9 of Weber's 12 points.
You are absolutely correct. They almost cost us the game last week. What is it with our "not so special" teams??
And, finally as Dr. Evil would say "throw me a friggin' bone people"

Oh, and I'm Jason Wiers, Platinum Property Management
- CARDIAC_CATS
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7857
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:37 am
The blocks in the back have to stop! It is being called on every play and is killing our starting field position. Just think how many points we could score if we started on the 30+ yard line each time. At least 2 of those this past week were just blatant out of the play type pushes in the back. WE CANNOT HAVE THAT this next week or it could cost us. Weber looked VERY impressive against the Griz in all 3 areas and they will be coming to knock us off on our home field this week. I love the tenacity/confidence we are playing with, but if a guy has his back to you just can't hit him in the back and expect the refs not to see it. It's better that you don't block the guy and let the return guy try and beat him than to block him in the back and back us up 10 yards etc.
- DriftCat
- 1st Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1559
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:39 pm
- Location: Billings, MT
I agree 100%. If the defender has his back to you....DON'T TOUCH HIM!!!!!!! Let the return man try and beat him because it is called every single time.CARDIAC_CATS wrote:The blocks in the back have to stop! It is being called on every play and is killing our starting field position. Just think how many points we could score if we started on the 30+ yard line each time. At least 2 of those this past week were just blatant out of the play type pushes in the back. WE CANNOT HAVE THAT this next week or it could cost us. Weber looked VERY impressive against the Griz in all 3 areas and they will be coming to knock us off on our home field this week. I love the tenacity/confidence we are playing with, but if a guy has his back to you just can't hit him in the back and expect the refs not to see it. It's better that you don't block the guy and let the return guy try and beat him than to block him in the back and back us up 10 yards etc.
- CARDIAC_CATS
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7857
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:37 am
- GavinDonos
- 1st Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1810
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:35 pm
- Location: Billings