NCAA JuCo waiver impact

Discuss anything and everything relating to Bobcat Football here.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

Post Reply
oedipuss
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 159
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:05 pm

NCAA JuCo waiver impact

Post by oedipuss » Mon Dec 23, 2024 10:50 pm

The NCAA has decided to allow an extra year of eligibility next year for any Juco transfers who will have exhausted their eligibility at the end of this season. For the Bobcats, that would mean Jon Johnson, JT Reed, and Cole Sain would all seemingly have the opportunity to come back next year.



KageRage
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:10 am

Re: NCAA JuCo waiver impact

Post by KageRage » Mon Dec 23, 2024 11:03 pm

Interesting to see if it applies retroactively. The article I read was mainly forward looking, never considered any talent that might already be on the team. Any thoughts?



Nickisch
BobcatNation Redshirt
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2022 11:08 am

Re: NCAA JuCo waiver impact

Post by Nickisch » Tue Dec 24, 2024 4:27 am

The way I read it was that it was a decision only for those that would've exhausted their eligibility this year and played Juco similar to Pavia. One time decision for now until it gets settled in court. Anyone that still has eligibility the decision doesn't seem to apply to at the moment.



User avatar
BelgradeBobcat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 8807
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 9:52 pm
Location: Belgrade, Montana

Re: NCAA JuCo waiver impact

Post by BelgradeBobcat » Tue Dec 24, 2024 9:31 am

The next thing will be guys playing in NAIA for one to four years and the transferring to an NCAA school for one to four years.



User avatar
LTown Cat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 5640
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:26 pm
Location: Lewistown, MT

Re: NCAA JuCo waiver impact

Post by LTown Cat » Tue Dec 24, 2024 9:58 am

No...the next thing is unlimited eligibility. If the players get paid by the school and therefore become employees of the university there is no way the NCAA wins a lawsuit limiting eligibility to xx number of years. All these decisions like the juco stuff are to avoid those lawsuits...but they are coming.



User avatar
PapaG
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 9020
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:44 am
Location: The Magic City, MT

Re: NCAA JuCo waiver impact

Post by PapaG » Tue Dec 24, 2024 10:17 am

LTown Cat wrote:
Tue Dec 24, 2024 9:58 am
No...the next thing is unlimited eligibility. If the players get paid by the school and therefore become employees of the university there is no way the NCAA wins a lawsuit limiting eligibility to xx number of years. All these decisions like the juco stuff are to avoid those lawsuits...but they are coming.
I brought this up awhile back, too. The only real way to avoid it is by collective bargaining with a players’ group/union in which both sides agree to a set amount of eligible years to play a sport. The NCAA rules regarding eligibility have been challenged for years, and with NIL now in play, an argument could be made that non-negotiated limits on eligibility are a violation of constitutional rights. If someone wants to pay Tommy $5 million next season to advertise their business on the contingency he plays football as a graduate student at a university, that career option isn’t available to him at present.

I’m not saying this is a good idea on the rules and challenges, just that arguments are already being crafted to do so against the NCAA on them.


Seattle to Billings to Missoula to Bozeman to Portland to Billings

What a ride

User avatar
RickRund
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 8078
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:08 pm
Location: Post Falls ID

Re: NCAA JuCo waiver impact

Post by RickRund » Tue Dec 24, 2024 11:26 am

So can Hardy get an extra year of eligibility? :D :D


msubobcats@outlook.com
Audiatur et altura pars: Let both sides be fairly heard.
Audi alteram partem: listen to the other side.

User avatar
BleedingBLue
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7060
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 1:00 pm

Re: NCAA JuCo waiver impact

Post by BleedingBLue » Tue Dec 24, 2024 11:49 am

I would say Sain, Reed, and Johnson could absolutely come back based on what I've read about the ruling. If they did, that would be awesome.



tetoncat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3935
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Montana

Re: NCAA JuCo waiver impact

Post by tetoncat » Tue Dec 24, 2024 11:52 am

BleedingBLue wrote:
Tue Dec 24, 2024 11:49 am
I would say Sain, Reed, and Johnson could absolutely come back based on what I've read about the ruling. If they did, that would be awesome.
Except for the kids waiting their turn behind them.


Sports is not bigger than life

User avatar
BleedingBLue
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7060
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 1:00 pm

Re: NCAA JuCo waiver impact

Post by BleedingBLue » Tue Dec 24, 2024 12:00 pm

tetoncat wrote:
Tue Dec 24, 2024 11:52 am
BleedingBLue wrote:
Tue Dec 24, 2024 11:49 am
I would say Sain, Reed, and Johnson could absolutely come back based on what I've read about the ruling. If they did, that would be awesome.
Except for the kids waiting their turn behind them.
Centers Nyland and Kaplan will be a Sophomore and RFr respectively. If Sain came back they still have plenty of time to start after next year.

If Johnson came back, Powdrell and Johnson would be the starters. McMillan and Carr, possibly Harmon would be the rotation guys similar to how the 3 main CBs rotated this year.

Reed would more than likely be in a competition with Mastel and Rollins.

I don't the see the problem.



tetoncat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3935
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Montana

Re: NCAA JuCo waiver impact

Post by tetoncat » Tue Dec 24, 2024 12:34 pm

BleedingBLue wrote:
Tue Dec 24, 2024 12:00 pm
tetoncat wrote:
Tue Dec 24, 2024 11:52 am
BleedingBLue wrote:
Tue Dec 24, 2024 11:49 am
I would say Sain, Reed, and Johnson could absolutely come back based on what I've read about the ruling. If they did, that would be awesome.
Except for the kids waiting their turn behind them.
Centers Nyland and Kaplan will be a Sophomore and RFr respectively. If Sain came back they still have plenty of time to start after next year.

If Johnson came back, Powdrell and Johnson would be the starters. McMillan and Carr, possibly Harmon would be the rotation guys similar to how the 3 main CBs rotated this year.

Reed would more than likely be in a competition with Mastel and Rollins.

I don't the see the problem.
It would be great for team, but similar to Covid years I think the younger guys and HS recruits don't get the opportunities they thought were there. Let's just pick Nylund. Opportunity to start as sophomore and play 3 years or he waits another and gets 2 years.


Sports is not bigger than life

Post Reply