Paying college athletes?

The place for news, information and discussion of athletics at "other" schools.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

Post Reply

Should college athletes get paid (specifically football/basketball)?

Yes
4
13%
No
7
23%
They already are
20
65%
 
Total votes: 31

User avatar
longhorn_22
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7592
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Billings/Bozeman

Paying college athletes?

Post by longhorn_22 » Tue Apr 25, 2006 2:39 pm

Discuss.
I vote 'They already are'. They already are getting paid for the most part. Free tuition and the benefits of being a college athlete is getting paid enough (for scholarship athletes). The second they start getting paid, it's going to slowly increase and snowball from there. Not only that, I see my tuition increasing to compensate for this.



User avatar
catamaran
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3803
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:31 pm

Post by catamaran » Tue Apr 25, 2006 2:46 pm

Their "salary" is paid through tuition/education, room and board, and the stipend. What is missing in the argument about paying athletes is that while colleges are making money off athletics, there wouldn't be an expenditure for college athletics without schollies etc. It would be like the "Golden" days when anyone could play a sport if they had spare time but they would have to pay their own way


if you're keeping score, France gave us Burgundy wine, cigarettes, berets, B.O., brie and the Napoleon complex-Bill Simmons

mslacat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 6157
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:12 am
Contact:

Post by mslacat » Tue Apr 25, 2006 3:47 pm

My initial reaction to this question has always been no, but I have a big problem with coaches salaries getting to be ridiculous levels. If these athletes are going to put forth a product in which a coach is making a million dollar salaries it has gone too far. At the Big Sky level it seems there is a good balance. To have a kid scraping together enough money to go out to a movie and then have the coach drive up in his hot sports car. Something is wrong there.


You elected a ****** RAPIST to be our President

User avatar
catamaran
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3803
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:31 pm

Post by catamaran » Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:13 pm

The biggest problem I have with that scenario is that the college actually pays for these vehicles (or they are donated, not sure) at MSU


if you're keeping score, France gave us Burgundy wine, cigarettes, berets, B.O., brie and the Napoleon complex-Bill Simmons

User avatar
G.W.Bush
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 539
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 8:33 am

Post by G.W.Bush » Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:30 pm

catamaran wrote:The biggest problem I have with that scenario is that the college actually pays for these vehicles (or they are donated, not sure) at MSU
MSU's cars are donated. I am sure the University picks up the tab on gas and insurance though.



whitetrashgriz
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3381
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 7:00 pm

Post by whitetrashgriz » Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:40 pm

i voted yes and i think that i will always feel this way. are they getting paid already? sure. room, and board, and a free education is nothing to laugh at. however, who made the rule that said that this form of payment should be all that these guys should be allowed to get? what if the pro leagues did this? let's say you get drafted in the nba. that in itself is a privledge. you get to travel the country, and make great money. but what if someone said that all players will make the same amount of money despite their status. afterall, they are still getting paid. it doesn't seem fair. if all of a sudden dan dickau is making the same as duane wade, you could see a problem. sports are a business, and many people are making a lot of money on these players. it's not as big of an issue at the small colleges such as montana state, but their are companies that have made millions selling leinart and bush jerseys for the last 3 years. whose to say they don't deserve any money becuase they have their education paid for. mslacats post was on the money. some of these kids don't have any spare money, yet i'm sure they appreciate the education. but no one thinks it's a weird world when a coach is worth millions, and the kids he's coaching have to borrow money from their folks until they either play pro, or get a job? we'd never see pro athletes get treated this way, and unfairly make a lot of money using a high profile athletes name, so i don't like it that it happens every year, at every university on some level in this country.


do you have to know everything to post here? or just think you do?

User avatar
catamaran
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3803
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:31 pm

Post by catamaran » Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:52 pm

So where does the cycle end. If college athletes start collecting paychecks, are they ameteurs anymore. What separates the NCAA from the NBA or do they become competing businesses? Kids don't have to choose college. They do so because they/their families value some sort of education rather than immediately entering the work field ie professional sports


if you're keeping score, France gave us Burgundy wine, cigarettes, berets, B.O., brie and the Napoleon complex-Bill Simmons

whitetrashgriz
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3381
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 7:00 pm

Post by whitetrashgriz » Tue Apr 25, 2006 5:17 pm

catamaran wrote:So where does the cycle end. If college athletes start collecting paychecks, are they ameteurs anymore. What separates the NCAA from the NBA or do they become competing businesses? Kids don't have to choose college. They do so because they/their families value some sort of education rather than immediately entering the work field ie professional sports
actually, do to the rules, kids do have to go to school. days of lebron james and kobe are long gone. so now, a kid who'd be the #1 pick in the nba, is forced to play in college, and while he is there, people are making a lot of money off him. he get's nothing. the cycle will end when the big-wigs of big time companies no longer can make jerseys, and bobbleheads, and water bottles, and sports cards of these kids, and stop using their name, and athletic ability to pad their wallets.


do you have to know everything to post here? or just think you do?

bobcatgrad2005
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 383
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 1:18 pm

Post by bobcatgrad2005 » Tue Apr 25, 2006 5:22 pm

The problem is that while these students are getting paid scholarships, NCAA rules prohibit them (as does the sheer time limits) from gettin goutside jobs. So for instance, while I was at MSU I had an academic scholarship that payed my was completley (living expenses, tuition and fees, book stipend), I still had an outside job to pay for spending money. Athletes are prohibited from such outside employment because of abuses of it in the past; ie: athletes getting "jobs" from wealthy donors who would have the player come "file paperwork" etc., when the athlete was doing no such thing.

BTW, the coaches pay their insurance on their curtesy cars, MSU reimburses for mileage for MSU related events.



User avatar
DriftCat
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1569
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Kalispell, MT

Post by DriftCat » Tue Apr 25, 2006 5:50 pm

I dont think the universities should pay the athletes, however, if a company wants to use an athlete to endorse their product then they should be able to recieve a paycheck.


F.K.A. - MM7CAT

bozbobcat
Member # Retired
Posts: 2081
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:11 pm
Location: Bozeman, Montana
Contact:

Post by bozbobcat » Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:20 pm

I said that these athletes are already getting paid. I think a full ride scholarship paying for room, board, books, and school is quite a hefty paycheck. I could see where it would be nice to have limited job hours for athletes over the summer so they could have some spending money. But I am in no favor of paying student athletes extra money. There are a lot of other students who have to pay their own way, either with their own money like I do, or through large loans. I imagine a lot of the other students on here feel the same way and it really is a shock to start paying for school. I know I've said this a million times already; excuse the ranting. But as far as MSU goes, I would be in favor of an increase in living stipends, but for the student-athlete who does well. For a student-athlete who does poorly in school, their money should be taken away and given back to a student who is doing well on the campus. But for right now, I say no to paying student-athletes.


GO CATS!
It's always a good day to be a Bobcat fan! :) =D^ \:D/
My name is Steve, if you'd like to know.

whitetrashgriz
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3381
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 7:00 pm

Post by whitetrashgriz » Wed Apr 26, 2006 1:40 am

bozbobcat wrote:I said that these athletes are already getting paid. I think a full ride scholarship paying for room, board, books, and school is quite a hefty paycheck. I could see where it would be nice to have limited job hours for athletes over the summer so they could have some spending money. But I am in no favor of paying student athletes extra money. There are a lot of other students who have to pay their own way, either with their own money like I do, or through large loans. I imagine a lot of the other students on here feel the same way and it really is a shock to start paying for school. I know I've said this a million times already; excuse the ranting. But as far as MSU goes, I would be in favor of an increase in living stipends, but for the student-athlete who does well. For a student-athlete who does poorly in school, their money should be taken away and given back to a student who is doing well on the campus. But for right now, I say no to paying student-athletes.
and this is my point bozbob... it is a hefty paycheck getting a free education. but when was the last time that we saw a bozbobcat jersey? when was the last time that a radio station was advertising that bearbac would be at their event? now, think about this. how many people do you see people wearing lulay jerseys? a ton. is it not fair that travis could receive any comphensation for his name making money? i agree that a free education is awesome. but who made the rule that said that that was enough, no matter the money being made using these athletes?


do you have to know everything to post here? or just think you do?

User avatar
catamaran
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3803
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:31 pm

Post by catamaran » Wed Apr 26, 2006 8:23 am

whitetrashgriz wrote:
catamaran wrote:So where does the cycle end. If college athletes start collecting paychecks, are they ameteurs anymore. What separates the NCAA from the NBA or do they become competing businesses? Kids don't have to choose college. They do so because they/their families value some sort of education rather than immediately entering the work field ie professional sports
actually, do to the rules, kids do have to go to school. days of lebron james and kobe are long gone. so now, a kid who'd be the #1 pick in the nba, is forced to play in college, and while he is there, people are making a lot of money off him. he get's nothing. the cycle will end when the big-wigs of big time companies no longer can make jerseys, and bobbleheads, and water bottles, and sports cards of these kids, and stop using their name, and athletic ability to pad their wallets.
That's not true any more. tHe NBA for example, started allowing 18 in the developmental league if they won't go to school


if you're keeping score, France gave us Burgundy wine, cigarettes, berets, B.O., brie and the Napoleon complex-Bill Simmons

whitetrashgriz
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3381
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 7:00 pm

Post by whitetrashgriz » Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:26 am

catamaran wrote:
whitetrashgriz wrote:
catamaran wrote:So where does the cycle end. If college athletes start collecting paychecks, are they ameteurs anymore. What separates the NCAA from the NBA or do they become competing businesses? Kids don't have to choose college. They do so because they/their families value some sort of education rather than immediately entering the work field ie professional sports
actually, do to the rules, kids do have to go to school. days of lebron james and kobe are long gone. so now, a kid who'd be the #1 pick in the nba, is forced to play in college, and while he is there, people are making a lot of money off him. he get's nothing. the cycle will end when the big-wigs of big time companies no longer can make jerseys, and bobbleheads, and water bottles, and sports cards of these kids, and stop using their name, and athletic ability to pad their wallets.
That's not true any more. tHe NBA for example, started allowing 18 in the developmental league if they won't go to school
ok, this maybe the case in basketball, although footballers still get screwed. but even if this is the case in the nba, it's still not fair, and just another way for the nba, and big companies to control kids and their talent. so they act like kids have a choice, but if you are lebron james coming out of highschool, and your new choices are play a year of big time college, or join the development league...what would you do? and knowing that you easily be the #1 pick if you were allowed to enter the league. meanwhile, every company you can think of is putting your name on their clothes and merchandise because until you are alllowed to sign endorsements, they can do this, and don't owe you a cent! not fair.


do you have to know everything to post here? or just think you do?

User avatar
catamaran
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3803
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:31 pm

Post by catamaran » Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:45 am

To quote the sage Denis Leary,"Life's not fair....get a f'ing helmet"


if you're keeping score, France gave us Burgundy wine, cigarettes, berets, B.O., brie and the Napoleon complex-Bill Simmons

Post Reply