Strahm Arrested for DUI
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:37 pm
You beat me to it!joe_montana_state wrote:Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.
Yep that's him.77matcat wrote:Is this the cheap shot artist??
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Didn't Joey Counts get suspended 1 game after he got a DUI last summer? I'm pretty sure he did, even though he got his trial pushed out to after football season ended.St George wrote:He will get off and not miss any football, Half the attorneys in Mizzoula will see to it.
I'm pretty sure he was suspended 3 games because it was his "second offense" until his trial after football season, which would have been his 3rd offense.91catAlum wrote:Didn't Joey Counts get suspended 1 game after he got a DUI last summer? I'm pretty sure he did, even though he got his trial pushed out to after football season ended.St George wrote:He will get off and not miss any football, Half the attorneys in Mizzoula will see to it.
But I'm not 100% sure.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Per UM's current policy, he should miss one game. What is their "patsy" game this year?blueandgoldblitz wrote:I'm pretty sure he was suspended 3 games because it was his "second offense" until his trial after football season, which would have been his 3rd offense.91catAlum wrote:Didn't Joey Counts get suspended 1 game after he got a DUI last summer? I'm pretty sure he did, even though he got his trial pushed out to after football season ended.St George wrote:He will get off and not miss any football, Half the attorneys in Mizzoula will see to it.
But I'm not 100% sure.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
I've wondered about that policy. If the players have to be suspended for "10% of their games that year for a 1st offense", in an 11 game season, that's 1.1 games. If they only suspend him for one game, then technically, he's not serving his full suspension. He should be suspended for 2 games (or the UM staple of 1 game and 1 quarter). Is that nitpicking? Of course it is. But if you're going to put something in your disciplinary policy like "10% of games" then you should at least follow it to the letter.HelenaCat wrote:Per UM's current policy, he should miss one game. What is their "patsy" game this year?blueandgoldblitz wrote:I'm pretty sure he was suspended 3 games because it was his "second offense" until his trial after football season, which would have been his 3rd offense.91catAlum wrote:Didn't Joey Counts get suspended 1 game after he got a DUI last summer? I'm pretty sure he did, even though he got his trial pushed out to after football season ended.St George wrote:He will get off and not miss any football, Half the attorneys in Mizzoula will see to it.
But I'm not 100% sure.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
That's like being a little bit pregnant.TomCat88 wrote:Does the student code weigh how drunk the driver was? Does a .081 carry the same penalty as a .261?
TomCat88 wrote:Does the student code weigh how drunk the driver was? Does a .081 carry the same penalty as a .261?
I disagree. There is a huge difference in how much of a danger a person presents to other people, if he has a .081 BAC versus a .261. I know that you may have been only half serious in saying that, but I've always believed that the penalties for DUI should be weighted, dependent upon the person's BAC.Cat_gld wrote:That's like being a little bit pregnant.TomCat88 wrote:Does the student code weigh how drunk the driver was? Does a .081 carry the same penalty as a .261?
Apparently you aren't familiar with most college football programs.autocat wrote:In most college football programs this guy would be replaced on the depth chart and suffer some serious consequences. In zoo town he'll receive free legal representation, sit out one game and praised as great young man who deserves a second chance. Hey it's football over everything else!!!
Agree, and I'd take that a step further and tell you that I could drink four beers and still drive better than a LOT of people on the road that are completely sober, so how is that fair?John K wrote:I disagree. There is a huge difference in how much of a danger a person presents to other people, if he has a .081 BAC versus a .261. I know that you may have been only half serious in saying that, but I've always believed that the penalties for DUI should be weighted, dependent upon the person's BAC.Cat_gld wrote:That's like being a little bit pregnant.TomCat88 wrote:Does the student code weigh how drunk the driver was? Does a .081 carry the same penalty as a .261?
Yes it's called aggravated DUIkwcat wrote:Some cities in Montana have enhanced penalties over .16
Maybe refer to it as an aggravated DUI?
Nonetheless, it will be a one game suspension minimum if guilty.