Bobcat Nation Forums
http://bobcatnation.com/bobcatbb/
YES.....Pecos24 wrote:https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.yahoo. ... caaf.html#
Nice to hear a positive story once in awhile...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
+1 as they shouldcatatac wrote:Hopefully the "friends" that didn't intervene get serious punishment as well.
Drum roll and rim shot.....St George wrote:My first thought was.....What is a Florida LB doing in Missoula?
I completely agree that it is admirable that this guy did the right thing by interrupting a (horrible) crime that was being committed.JDoub wrote:+1 as they shouldcatatac wrote:Hopefully the "friends" that didn't intervene get serious punishment as well.
They were, at the very least, accomplices to rape
For that matter, the LB could've potentially been thrown in the the "accomplice" category as a bystander if he did or said nothing about it, based on what he saw. Good to hear he did the right thing.
Milton Friedman addresses the "Freedom not to Act" in his response to a lawyer's excellent question. The scenario is not quite the same, but it's close enough for the point to be pertinent.Grizlaw wrote:I completely agree that it is admirable that this guy did the right thing by interrupting a (horrible) crime that was being committed.JDoub wrote:+1 as they shouldcatatac wrote:Hopefully the "friends" that didn't intervene get serious punishment as well.
They were, at the very least, accomplices to rape
For that matter, the LB could've potentially been thrown in the the "accomplice" category as a bystander if he did or said nothing about it, based on what he saw. Good to hear he did the right thing.
Having said that - failing to stop a crime that is in progress does not make someone an "accomplice." Not legally, at least...from a moral perspective, it might make one a horrible human being. But if a person's only connection to the crime is that they watched and didn't intervene, I don't think that makes them an accomplice...
Tell that to Jerry, George, Elaine and Kramer!!Grizlaw wrote:I completely agree that it is admirable that this guy did the right thing by interrupting a (horrible) crime that was being committed.JDoub wrote:+1 as they shouldcatatac wrote:Hopefully the "friends" that didn't intervene get serious punishment as well.
They were, at the very least, accomplices to rape
For that matter, the LB could've potentially been thrown in the the "accomplice" category as a bystander if he did or said nothing about it, based on what he saw. Good to hear he did the right thing.
Having said that - failing to stop a crime that is in progress does not make someone an "accomplice." Not legally, at least...from a moral perspective, it might make one a horrible human being. But if a person's only connection to the crime is that they watched and didn't intervene, I don't think that makes them an accomplice...
