Well, they beat Colorado. He got that part right. But unless Chadron moved up very, very quickly....The last option would be to choose a four-loss team, something the committee has done on rare occasions. It happened last season when the committee picked Montana State, but that was a team that played two FBS games and beat Colorado. Idaho (1995) and Appalachian State (1992) were a couple of other four-loss selections, but those teams also played tough schedules.
Coulson wrong again
Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
-
GrizinWashington
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7992
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:30 pm
Coulson wrong again
Does this guy do ANY research? The website he writes for has last year's schedules and results. Two mouse clicks could have gotten him correct info, and yet he posts something like this in his most recent column:
-
tampa_griz
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 5467
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:37 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Re: Coulson wrong again
I saw that too and just laughed.GrizinWashington wrote:Does this guy do ANY research? The website he writes for has last year's schedules and results. Two mouse clicks could have gotten him correct info, and yet he posts something like this in his most recent column:
Well, they beat Colorado. He got that part right. But unless Chadron moved up very, very quickly....The last option would be to choose a four-loss team, something the committee has done on rare occasions. It happened last season when the committee picked Montana State, but that was a team that played two FBS games and beat Colorado. Idaho (1995) and Appalachian State (1992) were a couple of other four-loss selections, but those teams also played tough schedules.
-
longhorn_22
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7592
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 11:43 pm
- Location: Billings/Bozeman
Re: Coulson wrong again
That's all anyone ever does.tampa_griz wrote:I saw that too and just laughed.GrizinWashington wrote:Does this guy do ANY research? The website he writes for has last year's schedules and results. Two mouse clicks could have gotten him correct info, and yet he posts something like this in his most recent column:
Well, they beat Colorado. He got that part right. But unless Chadron moved up very, very quickly....The last option would be to choose a four-loss team, something the committee has done on rare occasions. It happened last season when the committee picked Montana State, but that was a team that played two FBS games and beat Colorado. Idaho (1995) and Appalachian State (1992) were a couple of other four-loss selections, but those teams also played tough schedules.
-
kmax
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9858
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:23 pm
- Location: Belgrade, MT
- Contact:
It really is sad to see how far down the reporting from SportsNetwork has gone for FCS this year. I'll grant that Coulson has been a diehard of IAA/FCS football for a long time, but I much prefered the Tony Moss/Matt Daugherty approach of giving a younger guy that wants to prove something and move up in the journalism world the shot to show how well they could cover our subdivision.
“Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be—or to be indistinguishable from—self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.” -- Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
-
Grizlaw
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3305
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:04 pm
- Location: Floral Park, NY
-
GrizinWashington
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7992
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:30 pm
kmax wrote:It really is sad to see how far down the reporting from SportsNetwork has gone for FCS this year. I'll grant that Coulson has been a diehard of IAA/FCS football for a long time, but I much prefered the Tony Moss/Matt Daugherty approach of giving a younger guy that wants to prove something and move up in the journalism world the shot to show how well they could cover our subdivision.
-
Old Skool Cat
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3143
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:54 am
