The Bobcat Nation

Jake Locker





What say you?

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Jake Locker





What say you?

I would agree. That kid is great fun to watch.

That guy from LSU is pretty darn good. Just watched him beat Auburn.

Tim Tebow, Fla can do it all.

Sandcat wrote:Tim Tebow, Fla can do it all.

Agreed. Kentucky just got "Tebowed".

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Jake Locker





What say you?

I think Locker has the potential to be the best college QB, but this year I think some of the others mentioned are better.

Cledus wrote:

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Jake Locker





What say you?

I think Locker has the potential to be the best college QB, but this year I think some of the others mentioned are better.

I agree if Locker doesn't get hurt running the ball he may be the best QB in the country in the future but he's only a freshman.

I don't know who's the best but Dennis Dixon at Oregon is better than Locker right now IMHO.

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Jake Locker





What say you?

You haven't watched much college ball this year.

Tim Tebow
Andre Woodson
Dennis Dixon
Kyle Ryan

Nick wrote:

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Jake Locker





What say you?

You haven't watched much college ball this year.

Tim Tebow
Andre Woodson
Dennis Dixon
Kyle Ryan

I just don't think Tebow is all that.
Woodson is the best of the QB's you have listed.
Dixon is a better baseball player.
Ryan is also over rated.

I would take Locker over all of the guys you have listed, if he could be on any of those teams (Florida, Kentucky, Oregon,BC) and have a good coach you would then know why I say this.

He is that good with no running game or WR's and a sh*tbag retread coach.

AlphaGriz1 wrote:

Nick wrote:

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Jake Locker





What say you?

You haven't watched much college ball this year.

Tim Tebow
Andre Woodson
Dennis Dixon
Kyle Ryan

I just don't think Tebow is all that.
Woodson is the best of the QB's you have listed.
Dixon is a better baseball player.
Ryan is also over rated.

I would take Locker over all of the guys you have listed, if he could be on any of those teams (Florida, Kentucky, Oregon,BC) and have a good coach you would then know why I say this.

He is that good with no running game or WR's and a sh*tbag retread coach.

How can you say Dixon is a better baseball player. He has thrown 3 INTs this season one of them last night against Washington was a gimme pick on a hail mary. He is elusive and basically has the fake handoffs down to a perfect science.

Tebow runs over people like a fullback and still throws a feather pass.

Ryan is dead-on and IMO is the closest Locker comes to out of all these.

By the way Locker was something like 12 of 31 last night. He is good, and will be great, dont get me wrong. But right now he is not in contention with these guys.

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Jake Locker





What say you?

DENNIS DIXON!

I just got back from Seattle, BTW. What a day for the Ducks!

Like I said Locker is the team.

If he had RB's and WR's like Dixon or Tebow this conversation would be over.

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Like I said Locker is the team.

If he had RB's and WR's like Dixon or Tebow this conversation would be over.

Dixon has 3/4 of his starting receiving corps out for the season and 1/2 of his backfield.


Dixon > Locker

PapaG wrote:

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Like I said Locker is the team.

If he had RB's and WR's like Dixon or Tebow this conversation would be over.

Dixon has 3/4 of his starting receiving corps out for the season and 1/2 of his backfield.


Dixon > Locker

no

Brennen > Dixon > Locker

Brennan is better than Dixon as well but I would still take Locker over all of them, just my opinion.

Hell's Bells wrote:

PapaG wrote:

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Like I said Locker is the team.

If he had RB's and WR's like Dixon or Tebow this conversation would be over.

Dixon has 3/4 of his starting receiving corps out for the season and 1/2 of his backfield.


Dixon > Locker

no

Brennen > Dixon > Locker

Brennan plays a garbage schedule. Dixon > Locker > Brennan

That's a poor excuse, he can only play the schedule that is placed infront of him. It's still impressive to smack down the numbers he is. You still have to go out and execute.

If Hawaii had any defense they could play with anyone in the nation and compete at a high level.

AlphaGriz1 wrote:That's a poor excuse, he can only play the schedule that is placed infront of him. It's still impressive to smack down the numbers he is. You still have to go out and execute.

If Hawaii had any defense they could play with anyone in the nation and compete at a high level.

Maybe.

The thing that impresses me about Locker through is leadership over athleticism as this point. Once he gets going he'll belong in that spot. But I don't think he will get any help around him so stats won't help - but his leadership role will.

In the popularity contest that is the FBS they should be in the top 10. They are undefeated and many other teams are not. In the real world no 2 loss team should be ranked ahead of them.

It really doesn't matter anyway the FBS doesn't have a real NC.

Like I said if Hawaii had a defense they would play with anyone in the country, you can slow that offense down but you can't stop it.

AlphaGriz1 wrote:In the popularity contest that is the FBS they should be in the top 10. They are undefeated and many other teams are not. In the real world no 2 loss team should be ranked ahead of them.

It really doesn't matter anyway the FBS doesn't have a real NC.

Like I said if Hawaii had a defense they would play with anyone in the country, you can slow that offense down but you can't stop it.

If you are referring to Hawaii they have not played anyone within a whiff of a winning record - they barely beat LA Tech and San Diego State. They belong nowhere near the top 10.