Good thing we got rid of this guy
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 6:59 pm
Bobcat Nation Forums
http://bobcatnation.com/bobcatbb/
Yep, he wasn't here long- the handwriting must've been on the wall.......Bay Area Cat wrote:http://www.kotatv.com/Global/story.asp? ... enu411_2_5
Well, I guess when you spin it that way (a way I hadn't thought of until you mentioned it), we did recruit him and bring him to Bozeman. We just got lucky that he decided to leave.crazycat wrote:He was here longer than John Lebrum. Does that make him more of a "former" player than Lebrum and therefore more of a bad reflection on MSU? How is he any different than any other ex-MSU player that has found himself in trouble.
DW or Demetrius so I'm going to assume not the same guy.El_Gato wrote:DeAngelo Wall?
DW?
Wasn't that the monicker of the "ringleader" the cops mentioned several times following the arrests earlier this year?
Make up your mind BAC. Did WE recruit him or did Kramer recruit him?Bay Area Cat wrote:Well, I guess when you spin it that way (a way I hadn't thought of until you mentioned it), we did recruit him and bring him to Bozeman. We just got lucky that he decided to leave.crazycat wrote:He was here longer than John Lebrum. Does that make him more of a "former" player than Lebrum and therefore more of a bad reflection on MSU? How is he any different than any other ex-MSU player that has found himself in trouble.
Fine ... mark it up as another mistake by Kramer in terms of recruiting guys that apparently had violence issues.
Fine. Kramer recruited him. I was being too generous in my community-minded wording.crazycat wrote:Make up your mind BAC. Did WE recruit him or did Kramer recruit him?Bay Area Cat wrote:Well, I guess when you spin it that way (a way I hadn't thought of until you mentioned it), we did recruit him and bring him to Bozeman. We just got lucky that he decided to leave.crazycat wrote:He was here longer than John Lebrum. Does that make him more of a "former" player than Lebrum and therefore more of a bad reflection on MSU? How is he any different than any other ex-MSU player that has found himself in trouble.
Fine ... mark it up as another mistake by Kramer in terms of recruiting guys that apparently had violence issues.
You could also spin it to say that it was a good thing we/Kramer/Durham got rid of Lebrum and Miller.
I have no clue, but I don't think Wall is the DW they were referring to- another poster stated a while back that the other DW (Demetrius) hasn't been seen in the Bozeman area since last Dec. when Fuller & Sullivan were arrested. FWIWkcatz wrote:Might explain why the cops felt so comfortable throwing the initials DW out there. They knew he was already in custody. I have always wondered if they know/knew who DW was why they didn't arrest him but yet seemed to tip information that would let this guy know they knew who he was. Doesn't make sense to use the name as much as they did when you're still gathering evidence for a arrest.
kcatz wrote:Might explain why the cops felt so comfortable throwing the initials DW out there. They knew he was already in custody. I have always wondered if they know/knew who DW was why they didn't arrest him but yet seemed to tip information that would let this guy know they knew who he was. Doesn't make sense to use the name as much as they did when you're still gathering evidence for a arrest.
Just messin' with ya.Bay Area Cat wrote:Fine. Kramer recruited him. I was being too generous in my community-minded wording.crazycat wrote:Make up your mind BAC. Did WE recruit him or did Kramer recruit him?Bay Area Cat wrote:Well, I guess when you spin it that way (a way I hadn't thought of until you mentioned it), we did recruit him and bring him to Bozeman. We just got lucky that he decided to leave.crazycat wrote:He was here longer than John Lebrum. Does that make him more of a "former" player than Lebrum and therefore more of a bad reflection on MSU? How is he any different than any other ex-MSU player that has found himself in trouble.
Fine ... mark it up as another mistake by Kramer in terms of recruiting guys that apparently had violence issues.
You could also spin it to say that it was a good thing we/Kramer/Durham got rid of Lebrum and Miller.
I think it IS a good thing that we got rid of those players ... but that doesn't erase the fact that we recruited them and brought them here in the first place. So it's all true.
Well ... yeah, of course. Had they moved to Cuba to commit felonies and murder, it would have been even better. But unfortunately, it didn't work out that way.John K wrote:that if the "infamous 6" athletes had all left Bozeman and moved to the east coast upon leaving the football/basketball programs, and then started their "drug cartel" in New York or Miami, this whole thing would have been a total non-story.
Aye ... he's my second cousin. Good guy.John K wrote:Bay Area Cat....I have been meaning to ask if you are related to Greg Bergum, from Winifred? He was a friend of mine when I was at MSU in the late 70's....early 80's?
How do you know they were "dangerous people" before they came here? Maybe they got that way after they came to Bozeman and had they just stayed closer to home none of this ever would've happened to them.Bay Area Cat wrote:Well ... yeah, of course. Had they moved to Cuba to commit felonies and murder, it would have been even better. But unfortunately, it didn't work out that way.John K wrote:that if the "infamous 6" athletes had all left Bozeman and moved to the east coast upon leaving the football/basketball programs, and then started their "drug cartel" in New York or Miami, this whole thing would have been a total non-story.
Unfortunately, when one recruits dangerous people to a school in a certain location, those dangerous people are more likely to commit crimes in the location of that school than they are elsewhere in the country.
That's why most people get upset when you recruit dangerous people into a community.
The sooner everyone can come to grips with the fact that Kramer was fired for more than legal problems, the better off we will be as a Bobcat Nation. Trust me people, the lack of educational control by Kramer was a major factor in the firing.John K wrote:Wasn't there a Demetrius Williams that played receiver for the Cats in 2003? I seem to remember that he may have even started a game or two, including the playoff game against Northern Iowa, due to injuries in our receiving corps late that season. Does anyone else remember him?
Also, the news about DeAngelo Wall reinforces what I have been saying all along....that if the "infamous 6" athletes had all left Bozeman and moved to the east coast upon leaving the football/basketball programs, and then started their "drug cartel" in New York or Miami, this whole thing would have been a total non-story. Most Montanans would not have even known about it, and even fewer would have cared. It was just our (and Kramer's) bad luck that they chose to continue living in Bozeman. And that is precisely the reason why this was so unfair to Kramer....like he could have forced them to leave the area even he wanted to. I would amost guarantee you that he would still have his job if Fuller, Gatewood, et al. had become involved in these activities far away from Montana. That is also the reason I believe Hauck will survive the Wilson/Freeman episode....because it just will not seem as terrible to the good folks of Montana, since it happened in SoCal rather than Bozeman or Missoula.
Plausible deniability generally doesn't help out people in leadership positions (except Presidents of the United States, apparently). I wasn't talking about whether anybody "should have known" that anyone was dangerous, but rather the reality that they did turn out to be dangerous (or at least reckless and selfish).crazycat wrote: Your posts sound suspiciously like you're trying to divert attention away from the real source of the problem.
I said that tongue in cheek, as if to implicate you in some way. Nyuk-nyuk.Bay Area Cat wrote:Plausible deniability generally doesn't help out people in leadership positions (except Presidents of the United States, apparently). I wasn't talking about whether anybody "should have known" that anyone was dangerous, but rather the reality that they did turn out to be dangerous (or at least reckless and selfish).crazycat wrote: Your posts sound suspiciously like you're trying to divert attention away from the real source of the problem.
And the "real source of the problem" is?