So UM really wants their classless jerk back?

[Cataholic]

Kennesaw State belongs to the Big South. They had two teams ranked in the top 25 at season’s end with Kennesaw and Monmouth. They also have regular football contenders in the conference with Liberty (remember the Griz losing to Liberty in 2015 and Liberty is also moving to FBS) and Charleston Southern (recent FCS quarterfinal participant). So what makes you think the Northeast conference and the Big South are so similar?

Well Monmouth jut got completely embarrassed by UNI in the first round, 46-7. That validates my point even further. As for top FCS conference rankings, it's

MVFC
CAA
Big Sky
Southern
Southland

I'd say any conference after that trends toward a crap conference.

Did you ride the short bus as a kid??? The question was simple. According to you, the Northeast is as good as the Big South. WHY??? I have showed multiple FACTS that this is no where near the truth. FOCUS....

Incorrect. I said both SFU and Kenn St made the playoffs for the first time, were both from WEAK conferences, and ranked toward the bottom of polls. I said they were similar in all those facets. You hear what you want to hear.

You then brought up Monmouth to defend your opinion that the big south isn't weak, which is the dumbest example you possibly could have chosen. Try to keep up.

Reading comprehension is a real issue for you. You compared SFU and KSU as being similar. I said the Big South is stronger than the Northeast. I even provided you solid backing. You finally admitted on another post that I was right, the Big South is stronger than the NE. You are a real piece of work. You always have a Griz agenda and it always makes you look like an idiot!! Keep posting! Your stuff is gold!

You are probably right about Monmouth being bad. Given that Monmouth got an at large bid, that must mean that the Griz are really bad since they didn’t get a bid??

Answer the real question: Beavis or Butthead?

[1984TwoMinutesHate]

Sometimes the perfume of potential overcomes the odor of reality. So Hauck is a jerk...he's not applying for Jimmy Falon's job. From 2010 to 2014 he went 80-17 overall for the griz, 47-6 in conference. While at it he had great success as a recruiter. He was much more than a maintenace man. For most griz fans it was an amazing run love him or not. As dismal as his UNLV record was, he is the only Rebel football coach to have a winning season since 2000; 7-6 in 2013.
If hired he's coming with a mandate and a mission.
As a BOBCAT I only actually give a $tit once a year.

If he's hired, he will be getting his ass kicked by the Bobcats just like his predecessor Bobbi Stitt.

UNLV football has gotten better every year since Hauck left their program in shambles in 2014 after another 2-11 season. His HC tenure at UNLV was an embarrassing failure.

Bobbi Hauck is a has-been coach, whose glory years ended a long time ago. He's an ideal fit for a has-been FCS football program with a delusional fan base now.

[CatFan99]

Why is anyone worried about the direction or culture of the griz football team? I hope Hauck does get the job, runs the program into the ground and fails miserably!

[turkey_johnson]

Why is anyone worried about the direction or culture of the griz football team? I hope Hauck does get the job, runs the program into the ground and fails miserably!

I heard Bobby's got a new sideline cheer for the team; "GO GRIZ GO, NO MEANS NO"

The coaching staff he assembles will be very important. I hear OJ is available. I think he would be a good fit with BH.

[Grizaddict]

Grizaddict: I asked you a very direct question. Perhaps you should change your handle to GrizHuckabee. Would you rather be embarrassed by a MVFC team like UNI at their house or by a non-scholarship team like San Diego in your house?

Holy crap you were serious. I thought it was a rhetorical question as either choice sucks worse than Lewinsky in front of a business suit. Seriously both of those losses suck exactly the same. Both teams got trucked and embarrassed on the national stage. There is no silver lining or justifying a better loss in that. Well maybe for you there is.

[Grizaddict]

Kennesaw State belongs to the Big South. They had two teams ranked in the top 25 at season’s end with Kennesaw and Monmouth. They also have regular football contenders in the conference with Liberty (remember the Griz losing to Liberty in 2015 and Liberty is also moving to FBS) and Charleston Southern (recent FCS quarterfinal participant). So what makes you think the Northeast conference and the Big South are so similar?

Well Monmouth jut got completely embarrassed by UNI in the first round, 46-7. That validates my point even further. As for top FCS conference rankings, it's

MVFC
CAA
Big Sky
Southern
Southland

I'd say any conference after that trends toward a crap conference.

Did you ride the short bus as a kid??? The question was simple. According to you, the Northeast is as good as the Big South. WHY??? I have showed multiple FACTS that this is no where near the truth. FOCUS....

Incorrect. I said both SFU and Kenn St made the playoffs for the first time, were both from WEAK conferences, and ranked toward the bottom of polls. I said they were similar in all those facets. You hear what you want to hear.

You then brought up Monmouth to defend your opinion that the big south isn't weak, which is the dumbest example you possibly could have chosen. Try to keep up.

Reading comprehension is a real issue for you. You compared SFU and KSU as being similar. I said the Big South is stronger than the Northeast. I even provided you solid backing. You finally admitted on another post that I was right, the Big South is stronger than the NE. You are a real piece of work. You always have a Griz agenda and it always makes you look like an idiot!! Keep posting! Your stuff is gold!

You are probably right about Monmouth being bad. Given that Monmouth got an at large bid, that must mean that the Griz are really bad since they didn’t get a bid??

Answer the real question: Beavis or Butthead?

Take the crayons out of your mouth and put your safety helmet back. Here is exactly what I said....look back and you'll see this as fact:


I'm comparing them the way cataholic described SFU.....first playoff appearance ever, weak conference, poor top 25 ranking. Both fall under those categories. He said SFU was a cupcake the year the Griz played them. That would be like me saying kennesaw st is a cupcake this year. See the irony.


So yes, both teams are from weak conferences, were ranked low, and made their first ever playoffs...just like I said. You using Monmouth drives my point even further. That team got blown the ****** up, showing just how very weak that conference is.

[Cataholic]

Kennesaw State belongs to the Big South. They had two teams ranked in the top 25 at season’s end with Kennesaw and Monmouth. They also have regular football contenders in the conference with Liberty (remember the Griz losing to Liberty in 2015 and Liberty is also moving to FBS) and Charleston Southern (recent FCS quarterfinal participant). So what makes you think the Northeast conference and the Big South are so similar?

Well Monmouth jut got completely embarrassed by UNI in the first round, 46-7. That validates my point even further. As for top FCS conference rankings, it's

MVFC
CAA
Big Sky
Southern
Southland

I'd say any conference after that trends toward a crap conference.

Did you ride the short bus as a kid??? The question was simple. According to you, the Northeast is as good as the Big South. WHY??? I have showed multiple FACTS that this is no where near the truth. FOCUS....

Incorrect. I said both SFU and Kenn St made the playoffs for the first time, were both from WEAK conferences, and ranked toward the bottom of polls. I said they were similar in all those facets. You hear what you want to hear.

You then brought up Monmouth to defend your opinion that the big south isn't weak, which is the dumbest example you possibly could have chosen. Try to keep up.

Reading comprehension is a real issue for you. You compared SFU and KSU as being similar. I said the Big South is stronger than the Northeast. I even provided you solid backing. You finally admitted on another post that I was right, the Big South is stronger than the NE. You are a real piece of work. You always have a Griz agenda and it always makes you look like an idiot!! Keep posting! Your stuff is gold!

You are probably right about Monmouth being bad. Given that Monmouth got an at large bid, that must mean that the Griz are really bad since they didn’t get a bid??

Answer the real question: Beavis or Butthead?

Take the crayons out of your mouth and put your safety helmet back. Here is exactly what I said....look back and you'll see this as fact:


I'm comparing them the way cataholic described SFU.....first playoff appearance ever, weak conference, poor top 25 ranking. Both fall under those categories. He said SFU was a cupcake the year the Griz played them. That would be like me saying kennesaw st is a cupcake this year. See the irony.


So yes, both teams are from weak conferences, were ranked low, and made their first ever playoffs...just like I said. You using Monmouth drives my point even further. That team got blown the ****** up, showing just how very weak that conference is.

This is what was said prior to that:

Cataholic: Yeah. It was their (SFU's) ONLY appearance in the FCS playoffs EVER!!! They also come from that powerhouse conference the Northeast which features perrenial powers such as Wagner, Robert Morris and Sacred Heart (heavy sarcasim intended). Their conference winner this year was undefeated in conference play and NEVER CRACKED THE TOP 25. I know... pretty assinine....

Grizaddict: I think you just described Kennesaw St, who came all the way to bozeman and beat your team, too. SFU was ranked in the top 25 that year and was a playoff team, who the Griz beat. I'm just saying you shouldn't use playoff teams as your basis for a weak schedule, unless you're taking this year's Lehigh team who was 5-6 and got in. The first playoff team with a losing record to make it.


In the post above, you were comparing KSU and SFU. I explained that KSU comes from a stronger conference which you agreed with. Hence, yes, KSU is a stronger opponent than St Francis.

I am done arguing with you. You are a complete idiot. Grizaddict equals Grizmoron.


EDIT - WHY DON'T YOU SPEND SOME TIME WITH GRIZNATIONALIST? He actually contributes to a conversation. He works to see both side of an issues. You just argue, and poorly and juvenile at that (see multiple references to sand in the vagina). YOUR GRIZ AGENDA IS ALWAYS SO ONE SIDED AND USUALLY MORONIC.

[Grizaddict]

Kennesaw State belongs to the Big South. They had two teams ranked in the top 25 at season’s end with Kennesaw and Monmouth. They also have regular football contenders in the conference with Liberty (remember the Griz losing to Liberty in 2015 and Liberty is also moving to FBS) and Charleston Southern (recent FCS quarterfinal participant). So what makes you think the Northeast conference and the Big South are so similar?

Well Monmouth jut got completely embarrassed by UNI in the first round, 46-7. That validates my point even further. As for top FCS conference rankings, it's

MVFC
CAA
Big Sky
Southern
Southland

I'd say any conference after that trends toward a crap conference.

Did you ride the short bus as a kid??? The question was simple. According to you, the Northeast is as good as the Big South. WHY??? I have showed multiple FACTS that this is no where near the truth. FOCUS....

Incorrect. I said both SFU and Kenn St made the playoffs for the first time, were both from WEAK conferences, and ranked toward the bottom of polls. I said they were similar in all those facets. You hear what you want to hear.

You then brought up Monmouth to defend your opinion that the big south isn't weak, which is the dumbest example you possibly could have chosen. Try to keep up.

Reading comprehension is a real issue for you. You compared SFU and KSU as being similar. I said the Big South is stronger than the Northeast. I even provided you solid backing. You finally admitted on another post that I was right, the Big South is stronger than the NE. You are a real piece of work. You always have a Griz agenda and it always makes you look like an idiot!! Keep posting! Your stuff is gold!

You are probably right about Monmouth being bad. Given that Monmouth got an at large bid, that must mean that the Griz are really bad since they didn’t get a bid??

Answer the real question: Beavis or Butthead?

Take the crayons out of your mouth and put your safety helmet back. Here is exactly what I said....look back and you'll see this as fact:


I'm comparing them the way cataholic described SFU.....first playoff appearance ever, weak conference, poor top 25 ranking. Both fall under those categories. He said SFU was a cupcake the year the Griz played them. That would be like me saying kennesaw st is a cupcake this year. See the irony.


So yes, both teams are from weak conferences, were ranked low, and made their first ever playoffs...just like I said. You using Monmouth drives my point even further. That team got blown the ****** up, showing just how very weak that conference is.

This is what was said prior to that:

Cataholic: Yeah. It was their (SFU's) ONLY appearance in the FCS playoffs EVER!!! They also come from that powerhouse conference the Northeast which features perrenial powers such as Wagner, Robert Morris and Sacred Heart (heavy sarcasim intended). Their conference winner this year was undefeated in conference play and NEVER CRACKED THE TOP 25. I know... pretty assinine....

Grizaddict: I think you just described Kennesaw St, who came all the way to bozeman and beat your team, too. SFU was ranked in the top 25 that year and was a playoff team, who the Griz beat. I'm just saying you shouldn't use playoff teams as your basis for a weak schedule, unless you're taking this year's Lehigh team who was 5-6 and got in. The first playoff team with a losing record to make it.


In the post above, you were comparing KSU and SFU. I explained that KSU comes from a stronger conference which you agreed with. Hence, yes, KSU is a stronger opponent than St Francis.

I am done arguing with you. You are a complete idiot. Grizaddict equals Grizmoron.


EDIT - WHY DON'T YOU SPEND SOME TIME WITH GRIZNATIONALIST? He actually contributes to a conversation. He works to see both side of an issues. You just argue, and poorly and juvenile at that (see multiple references to sand in the vagina). YOUR GRIZ AGENDA IS ALWAYS SO ONE SIDED AND USUALLY MORONIC.

Pure awesomeness. If you replaced the word "Griz" with "Cats" you just literally described yourself. Maybe that's why you don't like me, because I'm just like you. ****** then I officially hate myself if that's the case.

[Cataholic]

Kennesaw State belongs to the Big South. They had two teams ranked in the top 25 at season’s end with Kennesaw and Monmouth. They also have regular football contenders in the conference with Liberty (remember the Griz losing to Liberty in 2015 and Liberty is also moving to FBS) and Charleston Southern (recent FCS quarterfinal participant). So what makes you think the Northeast conference and the Big South are so similar?

Well Monmouth jut got completely embarrassed by UNI in the first round, 46-7. That validates my point even further. As for top FCS conference rankings, it's

MVFC
CAA
Big Sky
Southern
Southland

I'd say any conference after that trends toward a crap conference.

Did you ride the short bus as a kid??? The question was simple. According to you, the Northeast is as good as the Big South. WHY??? I have showed multiple FACTS that this is no where near the truth. FOCUS....

Incorrect. I said both SFU and Kenn St made the playoffs for the first time, were both from WEAK conferences, and ranked toward the bottom of polls. I said they were similar in all those facets. You hear what you want to hear.

You then brought up Monmouth to defend your opinion that the big south isn't weak, which is the dumbest example you possibly could have chosen. Try to keep up.

Reading comprehension is a real issue for you. You compared SFU and KSU as being similar. I said the Big South is stronger than the Northeast. I even provided you solid backing. You finally admitted on another post that I was right, the Big South is stronger than the NE. You are a real piece of work. You always have a Griz agenda and it always makes you look like an idiot!! Keep posting! Your stuff is gold!

You are probably right about Monmouth being bad. Given that Monmouth got an at large bid, that must mean that the Griz are really bad since they didn’t get a bid??

Answer the real question: Beavis or Butthead?

Take the crayons out of your mouth and put your safety helmet back. Here is exactly what I said....look back and you'll see this as fact:


I'm comparing them the way cataholic described SFU.....first playoff appearance ever, weak conference, poor top 25 ranking. Both fall under those categories. He said SFU was a cupcake the year the Griz played them. That would be like me saying kennesaw st is a cupcake this year. See the irony.


So yes, both teams are from weak conferences, were ranked low, and made their first ever playoffs...just like I said. You using Monmouth drives my point even further. That team got blown the ****** up, showing just how very weak that conference is.

This is what was said prior to that:

Cataholic: Yeah. It was their (SFU's) ONLY appearance in the FCS playoffs EVER!!! They also come from that powerhouse conference the Northeast which features perrenial powers such as Wagner, Robert Morris and Sacred Heart (heavy sarcasim intended). Their conference winner this year was undefeated in conference play and NEVER CRACKED THE TOP 25. I know... pretty assinine....

Grizaddict: I think you just described Kennesaw St, who came all the way to bozeman and beat your team, too. SFU was ranked in the top 25 that year and was a playoff team, who the Griz beat. I'm just saying you shouldn't use playoff teams as your basis for a weak schedule, unless you're taking this year's Lehigh team who was 5-6 and got in. The first playoff team with a losing record to make it.


In the post above, you were comparing KSU and SFU. I explained that KSU comes from a stronger conference which you agreed with. Hence, yes, KSU is a stronger opponent than St Francis.

I am done arguing with you. You are a complete idiot. Grizaddict equals Grizmoron.


EDIT - WHY DON'T YOU SPEND SOME TIME WITH GRIZNATIONALIST? He actually contributes to a conversation. He works to see both side of an issues. You just argue, and poorly and juvenile at that (see multiple references to sand in the vagina). YOUR GRIZ AGENDA IS ALWAYS SO ONE SIDED AND USUALLY MORONIC.

Pure awesomeness. If you replaced the word "Griz" with "Cats" you just literally described yourself. Maybe that's why you don't like me, because I'm just like you. ****** then I officially hate myself if that's the case.

Except this is a Bobcat fan forum. You are a real idiot.

[iaafan]

The Good - he won a lot at UM.

The Bad - he lost a lot of big games, including three national championships and undefeated 2007 team lost in first round.
He was just 6-32 his first three years at unlv and 15-49 overall. He lost to two of three fcs teams (So. Utah 41-16, NAU 17-14) he faced and barely beat the third (No. Colorado 13-12; Bears finished that year 3-8).

The Ugly - his players got in trouble at a much higher than average rate.
He actually boycotted the school paper.

[Common Cat]

I have listened to Colter’s and Gus’s podcast the past two days- listening to the Hauck news. What is interesting to me is this heightened sense of “because it was like this, it so shall be again” attitude. Hauck no doubt was a great coach and if he come back and is anything less, they’ll eat him alive. Colter mentioned Jim McCalwain stating the Um job is the worst in college football because the expectations are as high as Alabama with a fraction of the pay. I don’t know how UM moves past the ol glory day mentality- I think what they had was a unique and fortunate and not replicable. Good luck

[iaafan]

It’s sad to see Colter associate with this Tootel character. The guy’s an absolute blow hard that I was hoping to not see on the Montana sports scene. He’s also a big homer. The national market is saturated with these flakes.

If they think Hauck will fix what ails the Griz, they’re taking a risk, but they can just say, “oops, guess I was wrong” and change the subject. Standard operating procedure for sports talk radio.

Haucks success at UM is tempered by his poor playoff record away from WGS and the overall weakness other BSC. He failed miserably at unlv. A guy who came straight from the high school ranks to replace Hauck is doing significantly better. Only one coach has done worse than Hauck at Unlv in the past 32 years (7 coaches).

[Cledus]

I have listened to Colter’s and Gus’s podcast the past two days- listening to the Hauck news. What is interesting to me is this heightened sense of “because it was like this, it so shall be again” attitude. Hauck no doubt was a great coach and if he come back and is anything less, they’ll eat him alive. Colter mentioned Jim McCalwain stating the Um job is the worst in college football because the expectations are as high as Alabama with a fraction of the pay. I don’t know how UM moves past the ol glory day mentality- I think what they had was a unique and fortunate and not replicable. Good luck

That's pretty funny. Not sure there's anyone outside of Missoula who would disagree. Because of this, BH might be the only person they can get.

[cats2506]

So BH had success the first time around, I think we all see that he came in at a perfect time and had all sorts of advantages that he wont have this time around. Maybe he can recapture past glory, maybe not, but what does it say about him that he so badly wants to get back to Missoula.

[ilovethecats]

you can't blame them for feeling this way though right? look how excited many of us are about choate and he hasn't won anything yet. I think many of them do assume it's going to be EXACTLY like last time, which I think is short-sighted. but I can't blame a fan base for being very optimistic when they bring in a coach who provided so much success that they haven't seen since he left.

[Grizaddict]

you can't blame them for feeling this way though right? look how excited many of us are about choate and he hasn't won anything yet. I think many of them do assume it's going to be EXACTLY like last time, which I think is short-sighted. but I can't blame a fan base for being very optimistic when they bring in a coach who provided so much success that they haven't seen since he left.

Someome that gets it. And when you couple it with articles like this, it's hard to not feel excited that the Griz are instantly better with him at the helm. I don't think for a second they will be the dominating force they once were, because so much has changed in the FCS and Big Sky landscape. But you'd be a fool to not recognize he has the most upside and the best chance to come in and make a difference right away, making the Griz a much more competitive, tough, disciplined team.

http://406mtsports.com/college/big-sky- ... 16768.html



http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/spo ... story.html

[catatac]

you can't blame them for feeling this way though right? look how excited many of us are about choate and he hasn't won anything yet. I think many of them do assume it's going to be EXACTLY like last time, which I think is short-sighted. but I can't blame a fan base for being very optimistic when they bring in a coach who provided so much success that they haven't seen since he left.

Someome that gets it. And when you couple it with articles like this, it's hard to not feel excited that the Griz are instantly better with him at the helm. I don't think for a second they will be the dominating force they once were, because so much has changed in the FCS and Big Sky landscape. But you'd be a fool to not recognize he has the most upside and the best chance to come in and make a difference right away, making the Griz a much more competitive, tough, disciplined team.

http://406mtsports.com/college/big-sky- ... 16768.html



http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/spo ... story.html

There are better options out there, perhaps much better. Options that don't come with baggage (Whether warranted or not BH does come with history). Options that don't have a terrible losing percentage during their last HC gig. Options that could concern me more as a Cat fan. Honestly not talking crap here, I think there are better options for the Griz.

[ilovethecats]

I don't think there is anyway that BH DOESN'T get this job. in fact, I think it's his now. and I personally think it's a great hire for them. and as always, I hope we beat his ass!

[WalkOn79]

Very interesting how this voluminous thread is in the Bobcat Football section and not the College Athletics section. Freudian?

Dude. Have you seen EGRIZ? Sometimes it seems like HALF the posts are about the Bobcats in some form or fashion.

[WalkOn79]

So serious question. if he comes back does anyone think he might not be as big an ***hole as he was before? I know I've mellowed a little in the past 7 or 8 years, and I'm close to his age

Is there a friendship with Coach Choate?