UM lawyers disagree with JJ allegations

[TomCat88]

http://m.helenair.com/news/state-and-re ... 2a106.html

You had to expect that UM would fire back. Quite a juicy claim by Paoli about Engstrom. Will he come up with the goods on it? Or was it that kind of an apology?

[tampa_griz]

http://m.helenair.com/news/state-and-re ... 2a106.html

You had to expect that UM would fire back. Quite a juicy claim by Paoli about Engstrom. Will he come up with the goods on it? Or was it that kind of an apology?

They didn't deny Engstrom made a personal apology to the Johnson family. They issued a 'no comment'. That pretty much tells you what happened.

It's good that another thread, bringing the total to three, was started in response to this article.

[Grizlaw]

http://m.helenair.com/news/state-and-re ... 2a106.html

You had to expect that UM would fire back. Quite a juicy claim by Paoli about Engstrom. Will he come up with the goods on it? Or was it that kind of an apology?

My guess is we've heard all we're ever going to hear on it. The case is settled. Engstrom and the University have nothing to gain by commenting on it, and Paoli doesn't have any more levers to force them to.