EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
- allcat
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8688
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:13 pm
- Location: 90 miles from Nirvana (Bobcat Stadium)
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
When you look at ISU, I actually see several logical rivals. Idaho, Weber, UM and MSU. The problem child for this is actually PSU, who gets them? This would be better if they put PSU in with the California triplets.
Geezer. Part Bionic,. Part Iconic
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8620
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:04 am
- Location: Great Falls MT
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
I'd like to see them rethink the whole designated rivalries concept. I mean most of them are just sort of contrived anyway, although of course there are a few exceptions to that, i.e MSU-UM, EWU-UI, Sac-UCD, etc. I'd prefer a 2 division format for scheduling only, so that you played all the schools in your own division every year, and then rotate through the teams in the other division. No conference championship game...the team with the best conference record would win the title. The CAA had divisions at one time, even though they didn't have a championship game. MSU, UM, EWU, UI, ISU, WSU in one division and PSU, UCD, SS, CP, NAU, SUU, and UNC in the other division. With a 9 game conference schedule, we'd play 4 of the 7 teams in the other division each year, which means that you could cycle through all of them in 2 years, and never go more than a single year without playing a team. The other division would play 3 of the 6 teams in our division each year, so that again they could play every team over the course of each 2 year cycle. That would keep intact all of the "true" rivalries, and it would reduce travel for most of the schools at least. Having all of the charter members plus EWU in one division would be geographically logical, as well as keeping all of the rivalries intact.
-
- 1st Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1613
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:40 am
- Location: North Idaho
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
I like this idea.John K wrote:I'd like to see them rethink the whole designated rivalries concept. I mean most of them are just sort of contrived anyway, although of course there are a few exceptions to that, i.e MSU-UM, EWU-UI, Sac-UCD, etc. I'd prefer a 2 division format for scheduling only, so that you played all the schools in your own division every year, and then rotate through the teams in the other division. No conference championship game...the team with the best conference record would win the title. The CAA had divisions at one time, even though they didn't have a championship game. MSU, UM, EWU, UI, ISU, WSU in one division and PSU, UCD, SS, CP, NAU, SUU, and UNC in the other division. With a 9 game conference schedule, we'd play 4 of the 7 teams in the other division each year, which means that you could cycle through all of them in 2 years, and never go more than a single year without playing a team. The other division would play 3 of the 6 teams in our division each year, so that again they could play every team over the course of each 2 year cycle. That would keep intact all of the "true" rivalries, and it would reduce travel for most of the schools at least. Having all of the charter members plus EWU in one division would be geographically logical, as well as keeping all of the rivalries intact.
It makes the travel schedule much better for the teams and fans in the "charter" division and most of the rest of the schools travel is a mess anyhow. When PSU gives up on football it makes the scheduling even better and then we could have a North and South Division. Would there be a concern that the schools in the charter division might break away at some point?
"Confidence is contagious. So is a lack of confidence." Vince Lombardi
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4999
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 5:40 pm
- Location: Cody WY
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
I like the idea too. I haven't heard any more rumblings about PSU's football future, anybody heard anything new? PSU's OOC schedule isn't made for success either. They have Oregon and Nevada on the road and College of Idaho at home. <sarc>That ought to draw the fans to the soccer field.....</sarc>Long Time Cat wrote:I like this idea.John K wrote:I'd like to see them rethink the whole designated rivalries concept. I mean most of them are just sort of contrived anyway, although of course there are a few exceptions to that, i.e MSU-UM, EWU-UI, Sac-UCD, etc. I'd prefer a 2 division format for scheduling only, so that you played all the schools in your own division every year, and then rotate through the teams in the other division. No conference championship game...the team with the best conference record would win the title. The CAA had divisions at one time, even though they didn't have a championship game. MSU, UM, EWU, UI, ISU, WSU in one division and PSU, UCD, SS, CP, NAU, SUU, and UNC in the other division. With a 9 game conference schedule, we'd play 4 of the 7 teams in the other division each year, which means that you could cycle through all of them in 2 years, and never go more than a single year without playing a team. The other division would play 3 of the 6 teams in our division each year, so that again they could play every team over the course of each 2 year cycle. That would keep intact all of the "true" rivalries, and it would reduce travel for most of the schools at least. Having all of the charter members plus EWU in one division would be geographically logical, as well as keeping all of the rivalries intact.
It makes the travel schedule much better for the teams and fans in the "charter" division and most of the rest of the schools travel is a mess anyhow. When PSU gives up on football it makes the scheduling even better and then we could have a North and South Division. Would there be a concern that the schools in the charter division might break away at some point?
Favorite name of a law: Millstone Act
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7177
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 12:44 pm
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
JohnK: have you submitted this idea to the league office? You should.
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9698
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 4:41 pm
- Location: Clancy, MT
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
I like the idea of 2 sub-divisions, but the way you have it divided up puts almost all the usual good teams on the same side. Too much chance a weaker team from the other side ends up with 7-8 wins and makes the playoffs with a weak schedule... Or a better team from the charter side misses out.
If you're gonna do the 2 divisions you can't put EWU, Idaho, Weber, and both Montana schools all in the same side, leaving mostly the crap teams on the other side. There's no way the Big Sky decision makers would do that.
If you're gonna do the 2 divisions you can't put EWU, Idaho, Weber, and both Montana schools all in the same side, leaving mostly the crap teams on the other side. There's no way the Big Sky decision makers would do that.
-
- 1st Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1613
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:40 am
- Location: North Idaho
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
I had concerns about that initially but didn't mention it because after thinking about it both SUU and NAU have been pretty good recently and teams from the South division still have to play 3 or 4 teams from the North division. For teams and fans whose goal is a national championship being in the tougher division is what you want. My 2 cents worth is that in the end it still works out OK.91catAlum wrote:I like the idea of 2 sub-divisions, but the way you have it divided up puts almost all the usual good teams on the same side. Too much chance a weaker team from the other side ends up with 7-8 wins and makes the playoffs with a weak schedule... Or a better team from the charter side misses out.
If you're gonna do the 2 divisions you can't put EWU, Idaho, Weber, and both Montana schools all in the same side, leaving mostly the crap teams on the other side. There's no way the Big Sky decision makers would do that.
"Confidence is contagious. So is a lack of confidence." Vince Lombardi
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8620
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:04 am
- Location: Great Falls MT
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
That's not necessarily true anymore. Both NAU and SUU made the playoffs last season, from what you consider to be the weaker division, while only WSU made it from the so called stronger division. Although historically, the one division has been stronger than the other. But the balance of power has been changing in the BSC in the last few years. It's no longer dominated by MSU, UM, and EWU as it was for many years.91catAlum wrote:I like the idea of 2 sub-divisions, but the way you have it divided up puts almost all the usual good teams on the same side. Too much chance a weaker team from the other side ends up with 7-8 wins and makes the playoffs with a weak schedule... Or a better team from the charter side misses out.
If you're gonna do the 2 divisions you can't put EWU, Idaho, Weber, and both Montana schools all in the same side, leaving mostly the crap teams on the other side. There's no way the Big Sky decision makers would do that.
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8620
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:04 am
- Location: Great Falls MT
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
No I haven't but maybe I should. And thanks.iaafan wrote:JohnK: have you submitted this idea to the league office? You should.
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8620
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:04 am
- Location: Great Falls MT
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
I"m really curious to see how well UI fares in the BSC this fall. They've been a perennial bottom feeder in the weakest FBS conference in the nation. A conference that may not be any stronger top to bottom than the MVFC. If I had to guess, I'd predict them to be no better than middle of the pack, anywhere from 3-5 to 5-3 in conference play.
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8620
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:04 am
- Location: Great Falls MT
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
If you wanted to better equalize the competitive balance, you could move UNC to the north division, and have 7 teams in the north and 6 in the south, since they're generally one of the weaker programs. Geographically they probably fit in better with the north anyway.91catAlum wrote:I like the idea of 2 sub-divisions, but the way you have it divided up puts almost all the usual good teams on the same side. Too much chance a weaker team from the other side ends up with 7-8 wins and makes the playoffs with a weak schedule... Or a better team from the charter side misses out.
If you're gonna do the 2 divisions you can't put EWU, Idaho, Weber, and both Montana schools all in the same side, leaving mostly the crap teams on the other side. There's no way the Big Sky decision makers would do that.
- WSUWILDCAT
- BobcatNation Team Captain
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 6:35 pm
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
John K wrote:If you wanted to better equalize the competitive balance, you could move UNC to the north division, and have 7 teams in the north and 6 in the south, since they're generally one of the weaker programs. Geographically they probably fit in better with the north anyway.91catAlum wrote:I like the idea of 2 sub-divisions, but the way you have it divided up puts almost all the usual good teams on the same side. Too much chance a weaker team from the other side ends up with 7-8 wins and makes the playoffs with a weak schedule... Or a better team from the charter side misses out.
If you're gonna do the 2 divisions you can't put EWU, Idaho, Weber, and both Montana schools all in the same side, leaving mostly the crap teams on the other side. There's no way the Big Sky decision makers would do that.
I always liked the idea of a Pacific/ Mountain Division setup.
Pacific
Davis
Poly
Sac
PSU
EWU
Idaho
Mountain
UM
Mont St
Weber St
Idaho St
UNC
SUU
NAU
Though I'm sure Idaho would not like that setup too much.
GOD BLESS AMERICA AND GO WILDCATS
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 5:21 pm
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
I like the idea of divisions but this specific setup wouldn't work. You can't have the 6-team division playing 4 of 7 teams in the other division but the 7-team division teams playing only 3 teams in the other division. That would be 24 out of division games for the 6-team division but only 21 for the 7-team division. Not sure how it's possible unless you have an equal number of teams in each division, so UND leaving kind of messes up that as a possibility unless someone else gets added.John K wrote: MSU, UM, EWU, UI, ISU, WSU in one division and PSU, UCD, SS, CP, NAU, SUU, and UNC in the other division. With a 9 game conference schedule, we'd play 4 of the 7 teams in the other division each year, which means that you could cycle through all of them in 2 years, and never go more than a single year without playing a team. The other division would play 3 of the 6 teams in our division each year, so that again they could play every team over the course of each 2 year cycle.
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8620
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:04 am
- Location: Great Falls MT
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
So what? I don't really see why that would be any huge problem? Some FBS conferences (ACC is one) have an odd number of teams, and therefore they don't have the same number of teams in each division.MSU01 wrote:I like the idea of divisions but this specific setup wouldn't work. You can't have the 6-team division playing 4 of 7 teams in the other division but the 7-team division teams playing only 3 teams in the other division. That would be 24 out of division games for the 6-team division but only 21 for the 7-team division. Not sure how it's possible unless you have an equal number of teams in each division, so UND leaving kind of messes up that as a possibility unless someone else gets added.John K wrote: MSU, UM, EWU, UI, ISU, WSU in one division and PSU, UCD, SS, CP, NAU, SUU, and UNC in the other division. With a 9 game conference schedule, we'd play 4 of the 7 teams in the other division each year, which means that you could cycle through all of them in 2 years, and never go more than a single year without playing a team. The other division would play 3 of the 6 teams in our division each year, so that again they could play every team over the course of each 2 year cycle.
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 5:21 pm
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
It's a problem because 24 doesn't equal 21, so the 6-team division needs three more games than the 7-team division has available to play. All of the FBS conferences with divisions, including the ACC, have an even number of teams and equally sized divisions.John K wrote:So what? I don't really see why that would be any huge problem? Some FBS conferences (ACC is one) have an odd number of teams, and therefore they don't have the same number of teams in each division.MSU01 wrote:I like the idea of divisions but this specific setup wouldn't work. You can't have the 6-team division playing 4 of 7 teams in the other division but the 7-team division teams playing only 3 teams in the other division. That would be 24 out of division games for the 6-team division but only 21 for the 7-team division. Not sure how it's possible unless you have an equal number of teams in each division, so UND leaving kind of messes up that as a possibility unless someone else gets added.John K wrote: MSU, UM, EWU, UI, ISU, WSU in one division and PSU, UCD, SS, CP, NAU, SUU, and UNC in the other division. With a 9 game conference schedule, we'd play 4 of the 7 teams in the other division each year, which means that you could cycle through all of them in 2 years, and never go more than a single year without playing a team. The other division would play 3 of the 6 teams in our division each year, so that again they could play every team over the course of each 2 year cycle.
-
- 1st Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1613
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:40 am
- Location: North Idaho
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
It will work out great once PSU gives up on football. Which I'm GUESSING isn't too far off.MSU01 wrote:It's a problem because 24 doesn't equal 21, so the 6-team division needs three more games than the 7-team division has available to play. All of the FBS conferences with divisions, including the ACC, have an even number of teams and equally sized divisions.John K wrote:So what? I don't really see why that would be any huge problem? Some FBS conferences (ACC is one) have an odd number of teams, and therefore they don't have the same number of teams in each division.MSU01 wrote:I like the idea of divisions but this specific setup wouldn't work. You can't have the 6-team division playing 4 of 7 teams in the other division but the 7-team division teams playing only 3 teams in the other division. That would be 24 out of division games for the 6-team division but only 21 for the 7-team division. Not sure how it's possible unless you have an equal number of teams in each division, so UND leaving kind of messes up that as a possibility unless someone else gets added.John K wrote: MSU, UM, EWU, UI, ISU, WSU in one division and PSU, UCD, SS, CP, NAU, SUU, and UNC in the other division. With a 9 game conference schedule, we'd play 4 of the 7 teams in the other division each year, which means that you could cycle through all of them in 2 years, and never go more than a single year without playing a team. The other division would play 3 of the 6 teams in our division each year, so that again they could play every team over the course of each 2 year cycle.
North
MSU
EWU
UI
WSU
ISU
UM
South
SUU
NAU
UNC
CPSLO
SSU
UCD
Living in northern Idaho and being a Cat fan I much prefer a north/south alignment.
"Confidence is contagious. So is a lack of confidence." Vince Lombardi
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9698
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 4:41 pm
- Location: Clancy, MT
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
What would be the average attendance at a South division game? 3500? I don't see it.
- Montanabob
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3736
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:29 pm
- Location: Two Dot
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
91catAlum wrote:What would be the average attendance at a South division game? 3500? I don't see it.
only if they scheduled MSU or UM that year.
UM - 141,212 total 23,535 avg
MSU - 111,702. 18,617.
*Idaho - 63,197. 10,533.
SUU - 57,231. 9,539
Weber - 52,794. 8,799.
UND - 52,139. 10,428.
EWU - 50,617. 10,123.
SSU - 49,891. 8,315.
NAU - 45,996. 6,571.
UCD - 41,472. 8,294.
CPoly - 37,600. 7,520.
ISU - 31,483. 6,297.
UNC - 21,917. 4,383.
PSU - 20,678. 4,136.
Big Sky Avg. per game: 9,927 (+208 over 2016)
3rd highest FCS Conference avg.
MSU fan.... U of I Graduate... They're Back
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8620
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:04 am
- Location: Great Falls MT
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
I see what you mean now. And I got confused about the ACC because they have 15 teams for basketball (and most other sports presumably), but of course Notre Dame is not actually an official member for football, even though I believe they're required to schedule at least 7 games against ACC teams. Thanks for catching that.MSU01 wrote:It's a problem because 24 doesn't equal 21, so the 6-team division needs three more games than the 7-team division has available to play. All of the FBS conferences with divisions, including the ACC, have an even number of teams and equally sized divisions.John K wrote:So what? I don't really see why that would be any huge problem? Some FBS conferences (ACC is one) have an odd number of teams, and therefore they don't have the same number of teams in each division.MSU01 wrote:I like the idea of divisions but this specific setup wouldn't work. You can't have the 6-team division playing 4 of 7 teams in the other division but the 7-team division teams playing only 3 teams in the other division. That would be 24 out of division games for the 6-team division but only 21 for the 7-team division. Not sure how it's possible unless you have an equal number of teams in each division, so UND leaving kind of messes up that as a possibility unless someone else gets added.John K wrote: MSU, UM, EWU, UI, ISU, WSU in one division and PSU, UCD, SS, CP, NAU, SUU, and UNC in the other division. With a 9 game conference schedule, we'd play 4 of the 7 teams in the other division each year, which means that you could cycle through all of them in 2 years, and never go more than a single year without playing a team. The other division would play 3 of the 6 teams in our division each year, so that again they could play every team over the course of each 2 year cycle.
- Montanabob
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3736
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:29 pm
- Location: Two Dot
Re: EWU Home Schedule Worst in Big Sky History?
I actually hate PSU's schedule more than EWU.
3-8 maybe 4-7 if they beat Nevada.
2018 PORTLAND STATE FOOTBALL SCHEDULE
L Aug. 31, at Nevada
L Sept. 8, at Oregon
W Sept. 15, College of Idaho
L Sept. 22, Montana State*
L Sept. 29, at Idaho*
W Oct. 6, at Montana*
L Oct. 13, Northern Colorado*
Oct. 20, bye
L Oct. 27, at Sacramento State*
W Nov. 3, Idaho State*
L Nov. 10, at North Dakota*
L Nov. 17, Eastern Washington*
* Big Sky Conference game
3-8 maybe 4-7 if they beat Nevada.
2018 PORTLAND STATE FOOTBALL SCHEDULE
L Aug. 31, at Nevada
L Sept. 8, at Oregon
W Sept. 15, College of Idaho
L Sept. 22, Montana State*
L Sept. 29, at Idaho*
W Oct. 6, at Montana*
L Oct. 13, Northern Colorado*
Oct. 20, bye
L Oct. 27, at Sacramento State*
W Nov. 3, Idaho State*
L Nov. 10, at North Dakota*
L Nov. 17, Eastern Washington*
* Big Sky Conference game
MSU fan.... U of I Graduate... They're Back