Future Schedule
Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
- Montanabob
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3736
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:29 pm
- Location: Two Dot
Re: Future Schedule
Because they think the NCAA will make the FCS season 13 games and we still get 7 home games.
MSU fan.... U of I Graduate... They're Back
- BleedingBLue
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6185
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 1:00 pm
Re: Future Schedule
I think the hope is 12 games. I don't know I've heard a push for 13. Plus there's no way the NCAA would allow 13 in the regular season plus possibly 5 playoff games. Too much wear and tear on college kids.Montanabob wrote:Because they think the NCAA will make the FCS season 13 games and we still get 7 home games.
-
- Member # Retired
- Posts: 2062
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:49 pm
- Location: Cody, WY
Re: Future Schedule
Hawks86 wrote:lcostello@msubobcats.comKittieKop wrote:
I thought an all FCS schedule was the best route to the playoffs. Now we're back to scheduling FBS which, unless you're NDSU (and we're not), are more likely than not losses. Div II gimme wins do nothing toward playoffs, and neither do FBS losses. While I like playing the big dogs, it doesn't help play off drives. I thought this had been hashed and rehashed the last decade, and the financials were such with the extra home game, pay day body bag games weren't necessary any more. Why are we back to thinking they're such a good idea? Or aren't we supposed to discuss athletic department decisions any more?
jchoate@msubobcats.com
Maybe we are in financial need? Maybe the money will go towards stadium improvements???
Hating the griz since 02.
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 5:21 pm
Re: Future Schedule
My view is that while an all-FCS schedule is ideal, I'll take a FBS money game any day over a completely useless D-II game that doesn't do anything for MSU except put another home game on the schedule. The way I see it with regards to the playoffs, a FBS game helps you greatly if you win and doesn't hurt you if you lose, while a D-II game doesn't help at all if you win and hurts you greatly if you lose. Plus, I'm guessing that the money MSU gets from playing those FBS games is extremely helpful not just for the football program but for the entire athletic department. Looking at it from a broader perspective than just what we as fans would like to see, this certainly needs to be taken into account at least to some extent when the football & athletic department staff is deciding who to schedule.KittieKop wrote:
I thought an all FCS schedule was the best route to the playoffs. Now we're back to scheduling FBS which, unless you're NDSU (and we're not), are more likely than not losses. Div II gimme wins do nothing toward playoffs, and neither do FBS losses. While I like playing the big dogs, it doesn't help play off drives. I thought this had been hashed and rehashed the last decade, and the financials were such with the extra home game, pay day body bag games weren't necessary any more. Why are we back to thinking they're such a good idea? Or aren't we supposed to discuss athletic department decisions any more?
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8620
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:04 am
- Location: Great Falls MT
Re: Future Schedule
I mostly agree with what you said, except for the part about an FBS game not hurting us if we lose. I don't believe that's true. From what I have read about the process, the selection committee doesn't really "discount" FBS losses. All other things being equal, a team that is 7-4 with an FBS loss isn't necessarily viewed more favorably than a 7-4 team who didn't play any FBS teams. And of course the FBS games are going to result in a loss at least 90% of the time, so I do believe that scheduling FBS games is going to hurt our playoff chances most years. I do agree that D-II games are worthless. It makes much more sense to schedule a lower tier FCS team that won't necessarily demand a return game, rather than a D-II team, if we want one "gimme" in our non-conference schedule. Besides hurting our playoff chances, since a D-II win essentially doesn't "count" in the committee's eyes, they are also generally poorly attended unless it's the Gold Rush game. I love our all-FCS 2018 schedule. I wish we could have a schedule like that every season, but I understand that financial realities may dictate that we have to play FBS games some years.MSU01 wrote:My view is that while an all-FCS schedule is ideal, I'll take a FBS money game any day over a completely useless D-II game that doesn't do anything for MSU except put another home game on the schedule. The way I see it with regards to the playoffs, a FBS game helps you greatly if you win and doesn't hurt you if you lose, while a D-II game doesn't help at all if you win and hurts you greatly if you lose. Plus, I'm guessing that the money MSU gets from playing those FBS games is extremely helpful not just for the football program but for the entire athletic department. Looking at it from a broader perspective than just what we as fans would like to see, this certainly needs to be taken into account at least to some extent when the football & athletic department staff is deciding who to schedule.KittieKop wrote:
I thought an all FCS schedule was the best route to the playoffs. Now we're back to scheduling FBS which, unless you're NDSU (and we're not), are more likely than not losses. Div II gimme wins do nothing toward playoffs, and neither do FBS losses. While I like playing the big dogs, it doesn't help play off drives. I thought this had been hashed and rehashed the last decade, and the financials were such with the extra home game, pay day body bag games weren't necessary any more. Why are we back to thinking they're such a good idea? Or aren't we supposed to discuss athletic department decisions any more?
-
- 1st Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Future Schedule
Alternative duplicate topic...Portland State future schedules:
2018 Nevada, Oregon
2019 Arkansas
2020 Arizona
2021 Hawaii
2022 San Jose State
2023 Oregon, Wyoming
2018 Nevada, Oregon
2019 Arkansas
2020 Arizona
2021 Hawaii
2022 San Jose State
2023 Oregon, Wyoming
-
- 1st Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1691
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 11:23 am
Re: Future Schedule
I don't like a D-II game either but I do recognize that D-II programs view FCS games much the same as we view FBS games. I would be disappointed if all FBS teams followed the Big 10 and said no more games vrs the FCS. I think we should keep this in mind.MSU01 wrote:My view is that while an all-FCS schedule is ideal, I'll take a FBS money game any day over a completely useless D-II game that doesn't do anything for MSU except put another home game on the schedule. The way I see it with regards to the playoffs, a FBS game helps you greatly if you win and doesn't hurt you if you lose, while a D-II game doesn't help at all if you win and hurts you greatly if you lose. Plus, I'm guessing that the money MSU gets from playing those FBS games is extremely helpful not just for the football program but for the entire athletic department. Looking at it from a broader perspective than just what we as fans would like to see, this certainly needs to be taken into account at least to some extent when the football & athletic department staff is deciding who to schedule.KittieKop wrote:
I thought an all FCS schedule was the best route to the playoffs. Now we're back to scheduling FBS which, unless you're NDSU (and we're not), are more likely than not losses. Div II gimme wins do nothing toward playoffs, and neither do FBS losses. While I like playing the big dogs, it doesn't help play off drives. I thought this had been hashed and rehashed the last decade, and the financials were such with the extra home game, pay day body bag games weren't necessary any more. Why are we back to thinking they're such a good idea? Or aren't we supposed to discuss athletic department decisions any more?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- VimSince03
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9442
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 5:43 pm
Re: Future Schedule
"There's two times of year for me: Football season, and waiting for football season."
- JDoub
- Member # Retired
- Posts: 2785
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:49 pm
- Location: Nashville
Future Schedule
8 of the 10 Root TV games are played in the State of Montana, both in the top 6 FCS for attendanceVimSince03 wrote:https://twitter.com/pgabriel15/status/844218559144312832
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:46 pm
Re: Future Schedule
Altitude typically picks up the broadcast of the non conference games and Fox Sports Arizona typically broadcasts NAU games. This means we could have 10 tv games for us out of Montana folks.VimSince03 wrote:https://twitter.com/pgabriel15/status/844218559144312832
- Montanabob
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3736
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:29 pm
- Location: Two Dot
Re: Future Schedule
9 out of 10 feature Montana schools.JDoub wrote:8 of the 10 Root TV games are played in the State of Montana, both in the top 6 FCS for attendanceVimSince03 wrote:https://twitter.com/pgabriel15/status/844218559144312832
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sept. 23 – Eastern Washington at Montana
Sept. 30 – Weber State at Montana State
Oct. 7 – Portland State at Montana State
Oct. 14 – North Dakota at Montana
Oct. 21 – Montana State at Northern Colorado
Oct. 28 – Idaho State at Montana State
Nov. 4 – Northern Arizona at Montana
Nov. 11 – Northern Colorado at Montana
Nov. 18 – Portland State at Eastern Washington
Nov. 18 – Montana at Montana State
MSU fan.... U of I Graduate... They're Back
- BleedingBLue
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6185
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 1:00 pm
Re: Future Schedule
I believe Root Sports AZ and Root Sports Rocky mountain also has games for UNC/Weber and NAU/SUU this is just the Root Northwest list. Also wondering which of the Nov 18 games is going to be a night game, unless the Eastern PSU game is actually Friday like usual.Montanabob wrote:9 out of 10 feature Montana schools.JDoub wrote:8 of the 10 Root TV games are played in the State of Montana, both in the top 6 FCS for attendanceVimSince03 wrote:https://twitter.com/pgabriel15/status/844218559144312832
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sept. 23 – Eastern Washington at Montana
Sept. 30 – Weber State at Montana State
Oct. 7 – Portland State at Montana State
Oct. 14 – North Dakota at Montana
Oct. 21 – Montana State at Northern Colorado
Oct. 28 – Idaho State at Montana State
Nov. 4 – Northern Arizona at Montana
Nov. 11 – Northern Colorado at Montana
Nov. 18 – Portland State at Eastern Washington
Nov. 18 – Montana at Montana State
- WSUWILDCAT
- BobcatNation Team Captain
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 6:35 pm
Re: Future Schedule
BleedingBLue wrote:I believe Root Sports AZ and Root Sports Rocky mountain also has games for UNC/Weber and NAU/SUU this is just the Root Northwest list. Also wondering which of the Nov 18 games is going to be a night game, unless the Eastern PSU game is actually Friday like usual.Montanabob wrote:9 out of 10 feature Montana schools.JDoub wrote:8 of the 10 Root TV games are played in the State of Montana, both in the top 6 FCS for attendanceVimSince03 wrote:https://twitter.com/pgabriel15/status/844218559144312832
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sept. 23 – Eastern Washington at Montana
Sept. 30 – Weber State at Montana State
Oct. 7 – Portland State at Montana State
Oct. 14 – North Dakota at Montana
Oct. 21 – Montana State at Northern Colorado
Oct. 28 – Idaho State at Montana State
Nov. 4 – Northern Arizona at Montana
Nov. 11 – Northern Colorado at Montana
Nov. 18 – Portland State at Eastern Washington
Nov. 18 – Montana at Montana State
Root Sports AZ and Root Sports Rocky don't show NAU, SUU, UNC or Weber Games. Weber has one and only one root sports game.
As far as other games on tv, Kjzz will most likely be picking up Weber's home games again.
GOD BLESS AMERICA AND GO WILDCATS
- Cledus
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 5468
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:18 pm
- Location: Billings Heights
Re: Future Schedule
In other words, if you want to see your favorite team on the TV you better hope they're playing one of the Montana schools.
UM is the university equivalent of Axe Body Spray and essential oils.
- WSUWILDCAT
- BobcatNation Team Captain
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 6:35 pm
Re: Future Schedule
Cledus wrote:In other words, if you want to see your favorite team on the TV you better hope they're playing one of the Montana schools.
This, unfortunately.
GOD BLESS AMERICA AND GO WILDCATS
- Hi-Line Bobcat
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3287
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:11 pm
- Location: Billings, MT
Re: Future Schedule
And it should rightfully be that way. Both MSU and UM put more people in the stands by a long shot compared to any other big sky school and obviously the viewer ratings are higher when those schools are playing. ROOT see's the ratings and they know where they can get more bang for their buck.WSUWILDCAT wrote:Cledus wrote:In other words, if you want to see your favorite team on the TV you better hope they're playing one of the Montana schools.
This, unfortunately.
If your left, you aren’t right.
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4999
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 5:40 pm
- Location: Cody WY
Re: Future Schedule
Weber announced some future non-conference games earlier this month:
http://bigskyfans.com/wildcats/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5564
My question is how would they know that they won't be playing Cal Poly in those seasons?
http://bigskyfans.com/wildcats/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5564
What is interesting to me is they have Cal Poly added in 2018 and 2019 as a non-conference game against a conference foe.Non-conference football schedule as listed:
2018
Aug 30 -- at Utah
Sep 8 -- at Cal Poly (non-conference game added)
Sep 15 -- vs. South Dakota
2019
Aug 31 -- at San Diego St.
Sep 14 -- at Nevada (added)
Sep 21 -- vs. Cal Poly (non-conference game added)
2020
Sep 5 -- at Wyoming (added)
My question is how would they know that they won't be playing Cal Poly in those seasons?
Favorite name of a law: Millstone Act
- BleedingBLue
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6185
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 1:00 pm
Re: Future Schedule
I would assume based on the rotating schedules they would miss Cal Poly those 2 seasons. It may change if the rivals change with the addition of Idaho, but that would be my best guess as to how they knew they could add them in advance.Rich K wrote:Weber announced some future non-conference games earlier this month:
http://bigskyfans.com/wildcats/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5564
What is interesting to me is they have Cal Poly added in 2018 and 2019 as a non-conference game against a conference foe.Non-conference football schedule as listed:
2018
Aug 30 -- at Utah
Sep 8 -- at Cal Poly (non-conference game added)
Sep 15 -- vs. South Dakota
2019
Aug 31 -- at San Diego St.
Sep 14 -- at Nevada (added)
Sep 21 -- vs. Cal Poly (non-conference game added)
2020
Sep 5 -- at Wyoming (added)
My question is how would they know that they won't be playing Cal Poly in those seasons?
-
- 1st Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Future Schedule
Western Illinois! Hot Dog! Always great to play someone from the Missouri Valley Conference. They play NAU this year. Beat NAU last year. Bobcats have played them twice....home/away 1990/1993 and beat them both times in decent games.